Skywest
10-16-2011, 12:08 PM
#271
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
I'm asking some questions for a friend who only has a Gmail account and thus can't register. His class date is January 2012, so yeah, SKY does have classes for the next year, and he got the interview call by going to the PHX Open House, wearing a suit, and studying his posterior off before the full interview, with 1200 total time and 400 multi MEI time.
Anyways, is anyone familiar with SKY's CRJ-200 limitations, specifically the icing conditions for ground operations CRJ700/900 vs. 200? He's trying to figure out if the type II or IV fluid requirement applies to all three, or just the 700/900. He's also wondering if that requirement should be type III vs. type II fluid.
Next, how strict is SKY on the wording of the limitations? For example, if the number is "250 and below", is "250 and lower" considered acceptable?
He's also asking if anyone would be willing to review his crib sheet (saves on paper vs. the study packet) to make sure he's doing it accurately. PM me and I'll send his verboten gmail address.
He does promise to get a real email once he has an income.
Thanks from a friend and from me!
Anyways, is anyone familiar with SKY's CRJ-200 limitations, specifically the icing conditions for ground operations CRJ700/900 vs. 200? He's trying to figure out if the type II or IV fluid requirement applies to all three, or just the 700/900. He's also wondering if that requirement should be type III vs. type II fluid.
Next, how strict is SKY on the wording of the limitations? For example, if the number is "250 and below", is "250 and lower" considered acceptable?
He's also asking if anyone would be willing to review his crib sheet (saves on paper vs. the study packet) to make sure he's doing it accurately. PM me and I'll send his verboten gmail address.
He does promise to get a real email once he has an income.
Thanks from a friend and from me!
Second, limitation are always verbatim. Know the exact verbage and don't deviate from it one bit.
Next, tell him if he got notes about a test from someone else, throw them away and do his own. Does he really want to base all his previous hard work and effort to get where he is now on someone else's notes? One mistake is all it takes.
Last, I don't know of anywhere in the US where type II and III fluid are used. I've only ever flown to places that have I and IV.
10-16-2011, 12:09 PM
#272
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Beach Bum
Posts: 322
I'm asking some questions for a friend who only has a Gmail account and thus can't register. His class date is January 2012, so yeah, SKY does have classes for the next year, and he got the interview call by going to the PHX Open House, wearing a suit, and studying his posterior off before the full interview, with 1200 total time and 400 multi MEI time.
Anyways, is anyone familiar with SKY's CRJ-200 limitations, specifically the icing conditions for ground operations CRJ700/900 vs. 200? He's trying to figure out if the type II or IV fluid requirement applies to all three, or just the 700/900. He's also wondering if that requirement should be type III vs. type II fluid.
Next, how strict is SKY on the wording of the limitations? For example, if the number is "250 and below", is "250 and lower" considered acceptable?
He's also asking if anyone would be willing to review his crib sheet (saves on paper vs. the study packet) to make sure he's doing it accurately. PM me and I'll send his verboten gmail address.
He does promise to get a real email once he has an income.
Thanks from a friend and from me!
Anyways, is anyone familiar with SKY's CRJ-200 limitations, specifically the icing conditions for ground operations CRJ700/900 vs. 200? He's trying to figure out if the type II or IV fluid requirement applies to all three, or just the 700/900. He's also wondering if that requirement should be type III vs. type II fluid.
Next, how strict is SKY on the wording of the limitations? For example, if the number is "250 and below", is "250 and lower" considered acceptable?
He's also asking if anyone would be willing to review his crib sheet (saves on paper vs. the study packet) to make sure he's doing it accurately. PM me and I'll send his verboten gmail address.
He does promise to get a real email once he has an income.
Thanks from a friend and from me!
I would tell your "friend" to wait until he receives the study packet for whatever airplane SKW decides to give him, then worry about it. Getting a head start is a good idea, but things could change from now until January, which is still a ways away. Studying things handed down from forums sometimes can be detrimental. The packet will have the important items he will need to focus on.
Also, this isn`t gradeschool so having someone review his work to make sure he is doing it accurately is not someone else`s responsibility. If someone else says he is doing it correctly then he gets to groundschool only to find out it`s not correct, he can only blame himself.
10-16-2011, 12:19 PM
#273
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Terantious, Mike's already received the study packet, so was asking his questions from it. Thanks for the cold water, though.
DENpilot, Mike'd would like to join, but his gmail account is specifically not allowed by Internet Brands (APC). Thanks for the verbatim answer. He made his own review sheet from the study packet, which is why he was wanting proofing. He'll hire someone instead of asking here.
DENpilot, Mike'd would like to join, but his gmail account is specifically not allowed by Internet Brands (APC). Thanks for the verbatim answer. He made his own review sheet from the study packet, which is why he was wanting proofing. He'll hire someone instead of asking here.
10-16-2011, 12:21 PM
#274
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
I did the same thing... I agree, it makes a heck of a lot more sense to do some research first! I've been here 6 months, and would be happy to answer any questions for you. Just send me a PM. Good luck with your decision!
10-16-2011, 12:34 PM
#275
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 40
awesome.!! thanks so much..! I'll just send you a PM.
10-16-2011, 01:26 PM
#276
Underpaid...
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Terantious, Mike's already received the study packet, so was asking his questions from it. Thanks for the cold water, though.
DENpilot, Mike'd would like to join, but his gmail account is specifically not allowed by Internet Brands (APC). Thanks for the verbatim answer. He made his own review sheet from the study packet, which is why he was wanting proofing. He'll hire someone instead of asking here.
DENpilot, Mike'd would like to join, but his gmail account is specifically not allowed by Internet Brands (APC). Thanks for the verbatim answer. He made his own review sheet from the study packet, which is why he was wanting proofing. He'll hire someone instead of asking here.
How about just getting a new e-mail account, there are tons of places that will give you a free e-mail account.
10-16-2011, 01:58 PM
#277
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 135
Really... It's this what airline training has become, pay someone to check my work, go online so someone can check my work... You are going to fly people, grow a pair and mature!!! It's not Riddle, ATP or a place like that, training wheels are off so welcome to the real world buddy!
How about just getting a new e-mail account, there are tons of places that will give you a free e-mail account.
How about just getting a new e-mail account, there are tons of places that will give you a free e-mail account.
10-16-2011, 02:12 PM
#278
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,057
I'm asking some questions for a friend who only has a Gmail account and thus can't register. His class date is January 2012, so yeah, SKY does have classes for the next year, and he got the interview call by going to the PHX Open House, wearing a suit, and studying his posterior off before the full interview, with 1200 total time and 400 multi MEI time.
Anyways, is anyone familiar with SKY's CRJ-200 limitations, specifically the icing conditions for ground operations CRJ700/900 vs. 200? He's trying to figure out if the type II or IV fluid requirement applies to all three, or just the 700/900. He's also wondering if that requirement should be type III vs. type II fluid.
Verbatim is normally the requirement. If you miss one item on the fill-in the-blank test you will fail. "250 and lower" might mean failure.
10-16-2011, 05:23 PM
#280
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
He stopped at:
Thanks for the answers!
Email Address Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Be aware that "freemail" accounts such as @yahoo, @gmail, @hotmail, @aol and other such free webmail providers are not allowed for user registration.
Entering a Freemail account in this box will result in a failed registration and a notice that your email is banned.
We do not make exceptions to this policy
details.
Be aware that "freemail" accounts such as @yahoo, @gmail, @hotmail, @aol and other such free webmail providers are not allowed for user registration.
Entering a Freemail account in this box will result in a failed registration and a notice that your email is banned.
We do not make exceptions to this policy
details.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
