Skywest
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Doesn't matter. Point is that if the gate agent doesn't want to unseat the person, you may lose out on getting on the flight. Whatever, I don't care. I'm just telling you what I saw happen once.
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Skywest
We have a J/S committee that will be interested nonetheless.
We also have things like HIMS as a non Union carrier.
-break-
*** Mike?
So we’re at a bit of a crossroads. We have the opportunity to take the next important step forward. Or we can place ourselves in a holding pattern.
We also have things like HIMS as a non Union carrier.
-break-
*** Mike?
So we’re at a bit of a crossroads. We have the opportunity to take the next important step forward. Or we can place ourselves in a holding pattern.
Just to clarify, HIMS is a federal program that exists and is funded appropriately because of ALPA and other unions, much like the ability for AOL pilots being able to use the JS, and known crew member, and countless other things.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,519
So I just got my offer and was asked what airframe I wanted. They seem to be the same to me, other then the delta benefits. Any +\- on the two?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Another factor is should you still be here for upgrade, the 175 seems to be the future for this company/industry, it is a lot easier to upgrade on a aircraft you've flown before. The ERJ is slightly junior to the CRJ (a month or two) at the moment, subject to change of course.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
You truly are a broken record, I assume your house is decorated in ALPA colors and ALPA wallpaper
Personally I think the 175 is better. The trips seem to be higher credit and once off first year pay the hourly rate is higher than the 200 which is what you will most likely be flying as a junior FO unless you get IAH. A big factor is where you want to be based, the 175 has fewer options than CRJ with ORD being the most likely place but other bases aren't unattainable.
Another factor is should you still be here for upgrade, the 175 seems to be the future for this company/industry, it is a lot easier to upgrade on a aircraft you've flown before. The ERJ is slightly junior to the CRJ (a month or two) at the moment, subject to change of course.
Another factor is should you still be here for upgrade, the 175 seems to be the future for this company/industry, it is a lot easier to upgrade on a aircraft you've flown before. The ERJ is slightly junior to the CRJ (a month or two) at the moment, subject to change of course.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
No it's not that because you can still jumpseat on delta. The main reason for CRJ for senior people staying on CRJ is most captains don't want to risk another training event before moving on, the ones that transition as captains are usually staying long term. FO staying on CRJ mainly because they don't want to upgrade and transition at the same time.
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 49
I'm aware. I worked for an ALPA carrier that is no longer with us. RIP
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post