Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2015, 05:42 AM
  #11291  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter
Revenue, I was talking about getting non-revs on. I was also talking about having the Capt. onboard with the plan. Who, if he had a spine (is that not how it goes down at XJ?) could fix it in a jiffy.

Doesn't matter. Point is that if the gate agent doesn't want to unseat the person, you may lose out on getting on the flight. Whatever, I don't care. I'm just telling you what I saw happen once.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 05:44 AM
  #11292  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default Skywest

Originally Posted by Caution Terrain
We have a J/S committee that will be interested nonetheless.

We also have things like HIMS as a non Union carrier.

-break-

*** Mike?
So we’re at a bit of a crossroads. We have the opportunity to take the next important step forward. Or we can place ourselves in a holding pattern.

Just to clarify, HIMS is a federal program that exists and is funded appropriately because of ALPA and other unions, much like the ability for AOL pilots being able to use the JS, and known crew member, and countless other things.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 05:54 AM
  #11293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,519
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck
***? Where on earth does it say this? I have never once been forced to sit up there and would refuse if asked.
It's in the TSA contract.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 07-25-2015, 06:01 AM
  #11294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WaterRooster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 922
Default

So I just got my offer and was asked what airframe I wanted. They seem to be the same to me, other then the delta benefits. Any +\- on the two?
WaterRooster is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 06:06 AM
  #11295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by WaterRooster
So I just got my offer and was asked what airframe I wanted. They seem to be the same to me, other then the delta benefits. Any +\- on the two?
Personally I think the 175 is better. The trips seem to be higher credit and once off first year pay the hourly rate is higher than the 200 which is what you will most likely be flying as a junior FO unless you get IAH. A big factor is where you want to be based, the 175 has fewer options than CRJ with ORD being the most likely place but other bases aren't unattainable.
Another factor is should you still be here for upgrade, the 175 seems to be the future for this company/industry, it is a lot easier to upgrade on a aircraft you've flown before. The ERJ is slightly junior to the CRJ (a month or two) at the moment, subject to change of course.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 06:10 AM
  #11296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Just to clarify, HIMS is a federal program that exists and is funded appropriately because of ALPA and other unions, much like the ability for AOL pilots being able to use the JS, and known crew member, and countless other things.
Skywest having a HIMS program has nothing to do with unions. The HIMS program was started by the NIAAA, the FAA then awarded a contract to ALPA, it was a federal program that was started and funded by the government, the program was then brainstormed by a UNited and Continental captain, the FAA then awarded contracts to ALPA, so to imply that ALPA came swooping in with its superman t-shirt is just silly. JS is based on reciprocating agreements, which non Union carriers have so I would assume alpa didn't negotiate that for us and other carriers. Union carriers pilots want to be on our jump as much as we want to be on theirs.

You truly are a broken record, I assume your house is decorated in ALPA colors and ALPA wallpaper
Squallrider is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 06:38 AM
  #11297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WaterRooster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Personally I think the 175 is better. The trips seem to be higher credit and once off first year pay the hourly rate is higher than the 200 which is what you will most likely be flying as a junior FO unless you get IAH. A big factor is where you want to be based, the 175 has fewer options than CRJ with ORD being the most likely place but other bases aren't unattainable.
Another factor is should you still be here for upgrade, the 175 seems to be the future for this company/industry, it is a lot easier to upgrade on a aircraft you've flown before. The ERJ is slightly junior to the CRJ (a month or two) at the moment, subject to change of course.
I'm want ORD as my hub, so the 175 is sounding much better. Is United that bad to nonrev on that more senior guys are sticking to the CRJ side?
WaterRooster is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 07:25 AM
  #11298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by WaterRooster
I'm want ORD as my hub, so the 175 is sounding much better. Is United that bad to nonrev on that more senior guys are sticking to the CRJ side?
No it's not that because you can still jumpseat on delta. The main reason for CRJ for senior people staying on CRJ is most captains don't want to risk another training event before moving on, the ones that transition as captains are usually staying long term. FO staying on CRJ mainly because they don't want to upgrade and transition at the same time.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 07:54 AM
  #11299  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by WaterRooster
I'm want ORD as my hub, so the 175 is sounding much better. Is United that bad to nonrev on that more senior guys are sticking to the CRJ side?
Water rooster,

Congrats on the offer. Any idea which class date yet?
GSintercept is offline  
Old 07-25-2015, 07:55 AM
  #11300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Caution Terrain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: PLEASE ADVISE
Posts: 339
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Just to clarify, HIMS is a federal program that exists and is funded appropriately because of ALPA and other unions, much like the ability for AOL pilots being able to use the JS, and known crew member, and countless other things.

I'm aware. I worked for an ALPA carrier that is no longer with us. RIP
Caution Terrain is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices