Skywest
#1093
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
I know its not that bad, but i have found that even a little tailwheel experience makes teaching a new hire easier. P-factor, 10 foot props make a lot. Rudder trim is a primary flight control.
#1094
The ATR is similar to this, 13 ft props and when you press the rudder pedal you don't control the rudder, you fly the trim tab... So at low speeds keeping it on the center line can be a but of a challenge, oh and the breaks suck... Anytime speed changed so did rudder trim!
#1096
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
You would have noticed a difference if you had...
#1098
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 10
Also, I have zero tailwheel time. But I think most pilots who get to this point understand p-factor, etc. Yes, the EMB does require a lot of rudder, and every time you change the power you will adjust the rudder trim. Tailwheel time certainly can't hurt, but I wouldn't sweat it too much if you show up to class without it.
This is just my opinion but the flying was the easier part of training. Don't get me wrong, the flying is not a walk in the park either, but ground school was very difficult. As I'm sure is the case with all new hire ground schools, a lot of good pilots don't make it through.
I've only been here a year, so take my opinion for what its worth.
#1100
I can tell within just a couple of landings if the FO I am flying with has tailwheel time or not. More often than not they don't, but we can usually straighten out the landings pretty quickly. More often than not it's just changing the sight picture to further down the runway. That being said, it's not really that big of a deal though, the EMB will land side-loaded and correct itself just like any other non-sweptwing tricycle gear aircraft (though it may be uncomforatable for the pax). It really is a resilient and forgiving airplane.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post