Skywest
FWIW, when I was a fairly jr line holder I would bid EXTREMELY generally. Almost to the point of not even considering it a bid. I feel like I generally got a better schedule because of it. The trick is to the percentage of trips available to you by layer 7 to be greater than your bidding percentage.
As I rise up the seniority pole I've started bidding specific pairings in layer 1 and 2, and then general parameters in the other layers. Starting by being very restrictive, and gradually becoming less so.
As I rise up the seniority pole I've started bidding specific pairings in layer 1 and 2, and then general parameters in the other layers. Starting by being very restrictive, and gradually becoming less so.
There really is no direct relation between your seniority percentage and the trips available percentage in PBS. Of course there is some correlation between the two, but there is not direct relationship. It's flawed logic to try to "match" your seniority percentage and the percentage of available parings. This is simply because your preferences could very well be the complete opposite of the next persons, ending up with completely different available pairing pools, but with the same exact percentage. You just don't know what other people's bidding preferences are. A crude example would be, I bid for 50% of the available parings, but you bid for the other 50%. We both bid 50% of the parings, but have completely different pools.
Again, this is simply what I've been told the the company PBS "experts".
With all that said, I agree that by layer 7 any person (especially Jr.) would want to have the highest percentage of available pairings available for PBS to choose from. The higher the percentage = casting a wider net.
FWIW, everybody I've talked to that's a supposed PBS authority at the company (help line, SAPA forums) says this isn't true.
There really is no direct relation between your seniority percentage and the trips available percentage in PBS. Of course there is some correlation between the two, but there is not direct relationship. It's flawed logic to try to "match" your seniority percentage and the percentage of available parings. This is simply because your preferences could very well be the complete opposite of the next persons, ending up with completely different available pairing pools, but with the same exact percentage. You just don't know what other people's bidding preferences are. A crude example would be, I bid for 50% of the available parings, but you bid for the other 50%. We both bid 50% of the parings, but have completely different pools.
Again, this is simply what I've been told the the company PBS "experts".
With all that said, I agree that by layer 7 any person (especially Jr.) would want to have the highest percentage of available pairings available for PBS to choose from. The higher the percentage = casting a wider net.
There really is no direct relation between your seniority percentage and the trips available percentage in PBS. Of course there is some correlation between the two, but there is not direct relationship. It's flawed logic to try to "match" your seniority percentage and the percentage of available parings. This is simply because your preferences could very well be the complete opposite of the next persons, ending up with completely different available pairing pools, but with the same exact percentage. You just don't know what other people's bidding preferences are. A crude example would be, I bid for 50% of the available parings, but you bid for the other 50%. We both bid 50% of the parings, but have completely different pools.
Again, this is simply what I've been told the the company PBS "experts".
With all that said, I agree that by layer 7 any person (especially Jr.) would want to have the highest percentage of available pairings available for PBS to choose from. The higher the percentage = casting a wider net.
At a small base, you're much better off asking around to get a sense for what your seniors will bid rather than using this thumbrule.
Anybody care to shed some light on getting started at a new base in terms of accommodation setup etc.
So scenario is you complete all your training at Denver and are assigned ORD as a base.
You need an apartment as you have no family there, need a car there but also need the time to set yourself up plus any other teething issues.
As a new hire about to go through this I'm keen to hear what others did.
Thanks in advance.
So scenario is you complete all your training at Denver and are assigned ORD as a base.
You need an apartment as you have no family there, need a car there but also need the time to set yourself up plus any other teething issues.
As a new hire about to go through this I'm keen to hear what others did.
Thanks in advance.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Anybody care to shed some light on getting started at a new base in terms of accommodation setup etc.
So scenario is you complete all your training at Denver and are assigned ORD as a base.
You need an apartment as you have no family there, need a car there but also need the time to set yourself up plus any other teething issues.
As a new hire about to go through this I'm keen to hear what others did.
Thanks in advance.
So scenario is you complete all your training at Denver and are assigned ORD as a base.
You need an apartment as you have no family there, need a car there but also need the time to set yourself up plus any other teething issues.
As a new hire about to go through this I'm keen to hear what others did.
Thanks in advance.
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
The only way I believe they go to xjt is if they dangle it as a carrot during a TA ratification vote. UAL has options for 175s so they can exercise 18 of them and award them to whoever they want.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
You'd need a lot more than 10 planes to justify starting a program, why wouldn't those planes not come to skywest who already have a program and no issues staffing? I don't mean to knock on xjt but to me it doesn't make sense
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Probably, but keep in mind that there are 18 more on top of the 10.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
You'll get better guidance in the SAPA forums. Also you can call the help line during the bid process for help. They have always helped me out. Bid for trips you want. Even being junior, if no one else senior bids that specific pairing, it's yours. You may not get that 27 hour four day, but if you want to see your cousin in Des Moines you just might that trip.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What "27 hour four day"?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 261
what does PL and P1 mean in PBS.. Founder underneath the listing . looks like dead heads?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post