Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Any crj 200 landing technique? >

Any crj 200 landing technique?

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Any crj 200 landing technique?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2019, 06:36 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,675
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That was my experience too. You'd be amazed at what I could do with a 200 by the time I was done with it. 900 I could land consistently where and how I wanted. 700 not so much.
for me on the -700 i would flair at 40-30, chop power at 30-20, stop my flair at 10 and hold it at that sight picture, on the -900 i would start my flair at 40, power back at 20-10 and when i heard "10" i would wait a second then release a little back pressure on the yoke. those seem to work well although its been awhile, ive only flown the -200 recently.

i personally think the -700 is easier than the -900. to me, the -200 lands like a GA plane
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 06:41 AM
  #22  
On Leave
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: CA
Posts: 65
Default

I think many pilots are taught to way over flare the -700. This leads to difficulties in pitch control and finding the runway, and also means a delay in getting the nose down, which subsequently delays your reverser deployment on a short runway. In reality it only needs a degree or two more flare than the -200. Pull the power at 10-20 feet depending on energy state/trend. I have had less trouble finding the ground, and while I’ll still have some firm landings, I haven’t experienced the ubiquitous crunchers that the 700 likes to surprise you with. I think it’s because at a lower flare angle, the struts are perpendicular with the ground and they do a better job.

The -700 will give you a much better greaser than the -200 if you’re lucky. Especially if you flared a bit too much and end up relaxing some back pressure right before the wheels touch. YMMV
metx192 is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 07:08 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

You fly a classic 900 or the EP/LR/Next gen? 700 lands like the long wing 900. You’ll need to pull the power back a bit sooner. 900 landings are flatter. 700 needs a bit more flare.

Originally Posted by Squawkbox2012
So I know the OP is talking the 200. For background, I have a lot of time in the 200 and the 900, not a lot in the 700. Been doing a lot of UA 700 flying and finding I’m hunting for the wheels more so in the 700.... curious if there is a reason for this as far as the aircraft dimensions perhaps? 900 I give a good flare and all is well.... 700 I feel like I’m hunting for the ground.... could just be me and probably is but it’s been consistent that way.... not fun when you’re trying to land on a short runway as is typical with the 700 compared to the 900..
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 01:55 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 114
Default

I like to very very slowly start inching the power back at 100 ft at 50ft I increase the rate a little. At about 10 feet I just hold it and let the speed bleed off. I find the 200 is very easy to land. It will come to you just keep working at it and remember to look way down the runway.

Welcome to the line your almost done
bonanza is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 04:13 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,561
Default

Originally Posted by metx192
I think many pilots are taught to way over flare the -700. This leads to difficulties in pitch control and finding the runway, and also means a delay in getting the nose down, which subsequently delays your reverser deployment on a short runway. In reality it only needs a degree or two more flare than the -200. Pull the power at 10-20 feet depending on energy state/trend. I have had less trouble finding the ground, and while I’ll still have some firm landings, I haven’t experienced the ubiquitous crunchers that the 700 likes to surprise you with. I think it’s because at a lower flare angle, the struts are perpendicular with the ground and they do a better job.

The -700 will give you a much better greaser than the -200 if you’re lucky. Especially if you flared a bit too much and end up relaxing some back pressure right before the wheels touch. YMMV
The 700 can be a tricky little **** depending on the weight. The heavier, the easier to get a greaser in 700 imo. But my trick with the 700 is I start my flare about 40-30 with the power coming out 30-20. Depending on weight, I may hold it the pitch attitude that I have it at or give it a little bit more flare which works for me. In the 900, I flare at the same point as I would in the 700, but I do not flare as much. However, power going idle at 20-10 in the 900.

The 200 reminds me of a Multi-piston high powered GA airplane. Very similar feel as a Baron or 310.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 05:31 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
um...dont think this was a case of him thinking he is a super pilot superior to his civilian counterparts. i had over 1000hrs of CFI time when i upgraded and i had some of the same thoughts about how far would i let an FO go before i intervened ( and he is right, you will know). im a civ pilot and that story resonates with me because ive seen it too. being an RJ captain with a new FO is surprisingly like being a CFI some times and i think most of us have had a time or 2 like this ( i bet it is a daily occurrence for LCAs)
Absolutely. When I was a new CRJ CA, I very quickly became very thankful and reliant upon my CFI experience. Almost all of us can relate to AirBear’s story.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 12-03-2019, 05:37 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 1,901
Default

Originally Posted by metx192
I think many pilots are taught to way over flare the -700. This leads to difficulties in pitch control and finding the runway, and also means a delay in getting the nose down, which subsequently delays your reverser deployment on a short runway. In reality it only needs a degree or two more flare than the -200. Pull the power at 10-20 feet depending on energy state/trend. I have had less trouble finding the ground, and while I’ll still have some firm landings, I haven’t experienced the ubiquitous crunchers that the 700 likes to surprise you with. I think it’s because at a lower flare angle, the struts are perpendicular with the ground and they do a better job.

The -700 will give you a much better greaser than the -200 if you’re lucky. Especially if you flared a bit too much and end up relaxing some back pressure right before the wheels touch. YMMV
100% agree with this. I flew ASE for a few years in both seats, and this technique provided consistent landings for a place you definitely didn’t want to float.

It used to get me a bit nervous with how some pilots flare the crap out of the 700... It leaves you with very little energy towards the bottom, and is also a VERY bad habit to get into for later in the career. You WILL tailstrike with that kind of technique in a 767 or 737-800+.
wrxpilot is offline  
Old 12-08-2019, 05:48 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 30 West
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by wrxpilot

It used to get me a bit nervous with how some pilots flare the crap out of the 700... It leaves you with very little energy towards the bottom, and is also a VERY bad habit to get into for later in the career. You WILL tailstrike with that kind of technique in a 767 or 737-800+.
How would you know? What Boeing Type ratings do you have? When did SKW start flying Boeings???????
YAKflyer is offline  
Old 03-15-2023, 07:23 AM
  #29  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 2
Default

Reviving an old thread…but in reverse!

Has anyone found the transition from CRJ100/200 (or Challenger) difficult at first moving onto something larger.

Been flying the Challenger for almost 9 years and lands (sight picture) quite different to the aircraft I recently just started on (Global).

Landings in Sim were fine but I find in the real world my brain reverts back to Challenger world. Not flaring enough, flaring too late. Resulting in smacking the ground. Also not used to a lot more aircraft hanging under me.

I’ve only flown a couple legs so still looking for the right sight picture and need time to feel for it’s cues but I definitely feel like a crappy pilot and all messed up coming from something that lands much flatter.

Anyone else have this problem coming off many years of the 100/200/Challenger where it took a bit of time to get used to?
AMPFlyeer is offline  
Old 03-15-2023, 09:50 PM
  #30  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,264
Default

Does your new plane have RADALT callouts? Those generally are very useful for flaring larger planes.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
in2deep
Endeavor Air
9
09-17-2018 04:26 PM
bbymse
Technical
1
01-16-2018 02:01 PM
Fher10
Regional
23
12-15-2014 03:22 PM
Florida Flyer
PSA Airlines
116
02-16-2010 03:34 AM
DublinFlyer
Regional
67
10-13-2009 05:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices