Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

SkyWest ?’s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2021, 04:48 AM
  #1541  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,331
Default

Originally Posted by captive apple
Times are tough Jim, let’s torpedo our economies of scale so people who don’t work here yet can “Aviate”.
That’s why I don’t see SkyWest in Aviate. Allowing pilots to fly multiple contracts is much more efficient than restricting them to just one. Aviate is just a carrot on a stick to attract new pilots to UAX companies. Neither SkyWest or Republic had recruiting problems, so they really don’t need that carrot.
Hedley is offline  
Old 01-18-2021, 06:40 AM
  #1542  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
It was a spoof about when Kirby and Munoz said early in the pandemic that the 50 seaters would be gone under any scenario, yet 2/3 of the Aviate airlines that are left fly only 50 seaters.

Mesa doesn’t fly exclusively for United, but from what I understand, their pilots fly for one contract at a time. Only those flying exclusively for United can be in Aviate. If they were to bid over to an American side, they’d no longer be qualified to be in the Aviate program.
Come Feb this will be true of Mesa pilots. However, prior to that the CRJ pilots could and did fly for both AA and UA.

Crj pilot badges show both carriers.
pangolin is offline  
Old 01-19-2021, 06:28 PM
  #1543  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley
It was a spoof about when Kirby and Munoz said early in the pandemic that the 50 seaters would be gone under any scenario, yet 2/3 of the Aviate airlines that are left fly only 50 seaters.

Mesa doesn’t fly exclusively for United, but from what I understand, their pilots fly for one contract at a time. Only those flying exclusively for United can be in Aviate. If they were to bid over to an American side, they’d no longer be qualified to be in the Aviate program.
Well, your “spoof” incorrectly paraphrased his statement. He left enough wiggle room in the actual statement where one could gather that 50 seaters would be around, albeit in reduced numbers, depending on how everything plays out. And has been pointed out, Mesa CRJ pilots did not fly specific contracts and that won’t be the case until next month.
piloto2 is offline  
Old 01-19-2021, 07:19 PM
  #1544  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,121
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
Well, your “spoof” incorrectly paraphrased his statement. He left enough wiggle room in the actual statement where one could gather that 50 seaters would be around, albeit in reduced numbers, depending on how everything plays out. And has been pointed out, Mesa CRJ pilots did not fly specific contracts and that won’t be the case until next month.
Why are MESA pilots just now being locked to a specific mainline carrier? will they be able to be reflowed to the other mainline carrier if the company needs it? Will they only get bennies on the carrier they support now?
threeighteen is offline  
Old 01-19-2021, 08:21 PM
  #1545  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

Ten bucks and the slow realization that you once swam in your dad’s nut says MT resurfaces at American.
captive apple is offline  
Old 01-20-2021, 05:02 AM
  #1546  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,331
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2
Well, your “spoof” incorrectly paraphrased his statement. He left enough wiggle room in the actual statement where one could gather that 50 seaters would be around, albeit in reduced numbers, depending on how everything plays out. And has been pointed out, Mesa CRJ pilots did not fly specific contracts and that won’t be the case until next month.
Statements like “thing of the past under any scenario” don’t leave much wiggle room if you intend to follow through, but statements from airline management should be taken like those from politicians. They will say what people want to hear, and if it actually happens, then all the better. I don’t think that the single class 50 seaters will be completely gone any time soon, but I do think that they will take a major hit. Kirby doesn’t want to free up more 76 seaters with a new NB fleet type, and UAL pilots aren’t going to relax scope. My guess is that either the 145’s or 200’s are parked by 2025 and that there will be a shift back to reduced frequency on larger planes, especially with the new emphasis on our environmental impact and potentially raising fuel prices when demand increases. There may be a few single class 50 seaters serving very small markets, but more flying will shift back to United. Instead of 8 flights a day on a 76 seater, there will be 4-5 on a 320/737, those markets served with high frequency 50 seaters will get fewer 76 seaters..... Our competition is going the same way. Delta is completely eliminating their 50 seaters, and Southwest and the LCC’s don’t use rj’s at all.
Hedley is offline  
Old 01-20-2021, 05:23 AM
  #1547  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,657
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
Why are MESA pilots just now being locked to a specific mainline carrier? will they be able to be reflowed to the other mainline carrier if the company needs it? Will they only get bennies on the carrier they support now?
isn’t it due to the fact Mesa is getting rid of UAL CRJs? So they will only have 175s for UA and only CRJs for AA.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 01-20-2021, 06:39 AM
  #1548  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by Meep
Nobody knows is Aviate will even be around after this.
Why would it be? The requirement was laughable in the first instance. The fact that ALPA bought it even more so.

Now, there might be all sorts of (mostly political) reasons to CLAIM a pilot shortage in 2021+ but the “data” will be as spurious then as now.
acecrackshot is offline  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:09 AM
  #1549  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by acecrackshot
Why would it be? The requirement was laughable in the first instance. The fact that ALPA bought it even more so.

Now, there might be all sorts of (mostly political) reasons to CLAIM a pilot shortage in 2021+ but the “data” will be as spurious then as now.
Since the beginning of the pandemic they have expressed the dedication to the program continuing on. They also have made hints that it will be expanding in 2021 which is why I brought up the topic on this forum.
EjectionSandals is offline  
Old 01-20-2021, 07:20 AM
  #1550  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by EjectionSandals
Since the beginning of the pandemic they have expressed the dedication to the program continuing on. They also have made hints that it will be expanding in 2021 which is why I brought up the topic on this forum.
Right, “expressed dedication.”

However, did any major have trouble filling classes in 2018-2019? I can’t think of one. A few no-shows here or there who were rapidly replaced.

These programs were the carrot to staff the regional, who in turn would accept these programs and the leverage given to both their regional and United. It was short term winning strategy for the pilot under certain circumstances. However there is a cost.
acecrackshot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
amcnd
SkyWest
42
02-17-2019 01:52 PM
iahflyr
Delta
10
09-07-2017 04:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices