Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest DFW Base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2018, 02:36 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
MadDog80's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo
Yep and who pushed him/power played him out? Thaaaaats right. So BR is still his boss. He just never saw it coming. The game plan back then was to move away from DAL. But after the musical chairs...well the plan shifted back towards DAL.
Delta got a couple of the 700s back but most went to AA.
MadDog80 is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 08:11 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Default

Now that Xjet has announced the closure of DFW, how long before SKW announces opening DFW/DAL as a new base?
calmwinds is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 09:18 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by calmwinds
Now that Xjet has announced the closure of DFW, how long before SKW announces opening DFW/DAL as a new base?
DAL is not happening. It’ll be DFW announced later this summer it sounds like.
hawk21 is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 09:42 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,875
Default

The ExpressJet service is concentrated at Dallas-Fort Worth and will migrate to SkyWest Inc., the carrier’s parent.
So says Bloomberg. 2019 or earlier didn’t say.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:16 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 845
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
No they dont. It is a standard 175 - just fewer seats. Chip even said it on the last earnings call that they can easily reconfigured.
The only reason we do that is for SCOPE. They are replaced my the ASS 700 that were coming off contract early.
Actually you are wrong.

The 175SC is very much a certified 70 seater, not just a 175 with only 70 seats installed. If they want to fit 76 seats in it, Skywest or Delta will have to pay Embraer to do so.

The 175SC is certified as the E170-200LL, effective Feb 5th, 2018.
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/507b9c78a71e9d248625822c005ccf62/$FILE/A56NM_Rev_11.pdf
Tpinks is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 02:33 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Default

It’s illegal under US regulations to install more than 70 seats in the 175SC. It’s a legal barrier, which can be overcome by purchasing the previously mentioned paperwork from Embraer.

But yeah, in every other way it’s a 175. You just gotta pony up some cash and perform a bit of installation work to increase seating.

And the SC variant is available from Embraer for others to purchase. It’s not a Skywest thing.
da42pilot is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 03:21 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by da42pilot
It’s illegal under US regulations to install more than 70 seats in the 175SC. It’s a legal barrier, which can be overcome by purchasing the previously mentioned paperwork from Embraer.

But yeah, in every other way it’s a 175. You just gotta pony up some cash and perform a bit of installation work to increase seating.

And the SC variant is available from Embraer for others to purchase. It’s not a Skywest thing.
It is just a way to drive price discrimination. I bet that the price to Embraer is 6/76 of the original purchase price to get it converted to full 76 seater ...
N1234 is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 07:15 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,378
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
It is just a way to drive price discrimination. I bet that the price to Embraer is 6/76 of the original purchase price to get it converted to full 76 seater ...
Just like the CRJ440 that was sold to compete with the ERJ-140.
KSCessnaDriver is offline  
Old 05-05-2018, 05:47 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
Just like the CRJ440 that was sold to compete with the ERJ-140.
CRJ 440 was a standard sized CRJ certified to a max passenger count of 44 to get around NWA scope rules. I'm pretty sure it had a big closet up front where a 50 seater would have seats. The ERJ 140 actually had a shorter fuselage than the 145.
BrewCity is offline  
Old 05-05-2018, 06:14 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Default

Originally Posted by BrewCity
CRJ 440 was a standard sized CRJ certified to a max passenger count of 44 to get around NWA scope rules. I'm pretty sure it had a big closet up front where a 50 seater would have seats. The ERJ 140 actually had a shorter fuselage than the 145.
What is the cabin difference, besides another jump seat and fewer seats, of the E175SC and the Ejet we are used?
calmwinds is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SimJumpSeat
PSA Airlines
35
02-19-2014 07:52 AM
Slats
Hiring News
12
05-23-2013 02:59 AM
Drums4life
Regional
107
08-16-2011 11:21 PM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 09:05 PM
duvie
Regional
5
12-16-2006 12:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices