The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
No union. Never here. See how much it does for every other regional? Ever read their threads? All they do is b:!ch and complain about them. They don't do much at this level of the business.
And if we ever did get one, it would set a precedent to merge lists with XJT. Be careful what you wish for.
And if we ever did get one, it would set a precedent to merge lists with XJT. Be careful what you wish for.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
That whole line of thinking that ALPA only represents majors, conflict of interest etc doesn't apply to Teamsters or your own union. There is nothing wrong with having pilots pay for their own representation and fund their own negotiators at the bargaining table. Nobody has really explained why Skywest pilots think it's a good idea for pilot negotiators to be paid by management.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest
My understanding is that she wasn't even given the opportunity to upgrade, didn't even get a class assigned.
Maybe the requirement to call a MOD exist for certain circumstances of sick calls? I know one captain who was fired for calling in sick in the middle of a trip, the case I alluded to earlier. I don't know but I'm not sure why anybody should have to talk to a Cheif pilot to call in sick regardless if it was 2004 or 2003.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
One thing to keep in mind, is that each airline is its own individual entity. Management styles and policies, work group styles and policies all differ from airline to airline. What is good for one airlines work group, does not automatically shift to another airlines work group. As I have stated before, there seems to be bitter feelings from unionized airlines pilot groups at SkyWest because the airline is running fine without a union, and they don't seem to want one either. Bottom line is, majority of the group is just fine with how things are and don't want the union.
Why in your mind do you feel SkyWest is in need of a union anyway? Always curious why someone who doesn't even work for the carrier is so concerned with its union situation? This some sort of "brotherhood" thing?
Why in your mind do you feel SkyWest is in need of a union anyway? Always curious why someone who doesn't even work for the carrier is so concerned with its union situation? This some sort of "brotherhood" thing?
I won't be there for much longer so I'm just asking the questions that many have but may have never asked.
#85
That whole line of thinking that ALPA only represents majors, conflict of interest etc doesn't apply to Teamsters or your own union. There is nothing wrong with having pilots pay for their own representation and fund their own negotiators at the bargaining table. Nobody has really explained why Skywest pilots think it's a good idea for pilot negotiators to be paid by management.
#86
Again, since you are not even a SkyWest Airlines pilot, why do you give a d@mn about there not being a union on property? It doesn't have any impact on you in any way shape or form. Sounds like someone interviewed at SkyWest and wasn't offered a position.
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
No union. Never here. See how much it does for every other regional? Ever read their threads? All they do is b:!ch and complain about them. They don't do much at this level of the business.
And if we ever did get one, it would set a precedent to merge lists with XJT. Be careful what you wish for.
And if we ever did get one, it would set a precedent to merge lists with XJT. Be careful what you wish for.
Plus, a pilot union is a lot more than just about a contract and how bad or good it is.
Why in your mind do you feel SkyWest is in no need of a union anyway? Always curious why someone who doesn't even work for the carrier is so concerned with its union situation? This some sort of "brotherhood" thing?
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Dumbest thing I have read all day. How do you suppose XJT would undercut SkyWest. You know that both airlines have the same CEO right? Do you honestly think INC would let something like that happen?
Again, since you are not even a SkyWest Airlines pilot, why do you give a d@mn about there not being a union on property? It doesn't have any impact on you in any way shape or form. Sounds like someone interviewed at SkyWest and wasn't offered a position.
Again, since you are not even a SkyWest Airlines pilot, why do you give a d@mn about there not being a union on property? It doesn't have any impact on you in any way shape or form. Sounds like someone interviewed at SkyWest and wasn't offered a position.
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 155
Can we please put this stupid union thread to rest and find something else to complain about? It won't do us any good and we are a much better airline without the drama associated with it. We have it better than every other "contract carrier" and are growing in spite of one. Dont bite the hand that feeds you.
#90
You must be new...or know nothing about business. Probably both. They are two separate airlines by the same holding company. You think that if XJT pilots came in tomorrow and said we'll do it for 20% less than Skywest only if you give us the new planes, management will say "No Thanks, we like paying more"? What are you smoking... Shareholder interests are always first in a publicly traded company. Period. Btw, I'm not advocating at all for any of that, I would never advocate for a penny less in this environment. Just throwing scenarios out there. Why are you people so defensive?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post