Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
News on the new Skywest pay package >

News on the new Skywest pay package

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

News on the new Skywest pay package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2017, 09:39 PM
  #921  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by amcnd
Wasn't that long ago DL was paying 24k your first year... and Regionals were max 60's as a turbo prop Captain. Now its Easy to make 100k as a RJ captain and put in 15-20 years your looking at 120-150k. Not bad compared to what i was thinking when I started at the regionals 20 years ago!!






Never made even close to 150K, not possible with the minimum credit pairings that make up the majority of our flying.
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 06:54 AM
  #922  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,580
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
As you should not care what I come up with, exactly my point. And if someone is under NDA and spreading rumors, then there is a bigger problem.
I don't agree with much of what you say, but this! Just because negotiating is done doesn't mean you can magically talk about the NDA. Especially if it hasn't been announced yet.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 07:01 AM
  #923  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider
It's only passed at the SAPA level not voted on by pilots yet. Seems like a 1% raise, and soft landings (ppl can come to Skywest and maintain longevity e.g. 10 year republic FO can be 10 year FO day one at Skywest) . Not many details are available but so far seems like a tiny raise to maybe get more flying.
I've tried looking over this thread several times... I didn't see where if anything was passed just a bunch of arguing.

Did anything actually pass? and if so what?

Thanks.
JayBee is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:23 AM
  #924  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blindfayth's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 367
Default

Soo if soft landings 2.0 is a thing, and I'm looking to get into the 121 field as a CFI building hours..

It seems like it wouldn't be a horrible idea to go somewhere like AWAC, collect the huge frontloaded bonuses money, work there for 2 years, then come to OO as a 2nd or 3rd year FO. While I wouldn't have seniority for base/schedule bidding, I wouldn't have to start at the bottom of the pay rung at OO, correct?

Seems weird that I feel incentivized to go this route, even though I ultimately want to go Skywest.
blindfayth is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:28 AM
  #925  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,252
Default

Originally Posted by blindfayth
Soo if soft landings 2.0 is a thing, and I'm looking to get into the 121 field as a CFI building hours..

It seems like it wouldn't be a horrible idea to go somewhere like AWAC, collect the huge frontloaded bonuses money, work there for 2 years, then come to OO as a 2nd or 3rd year FO. While I wouldn't have seniority for base/schedule bidding, I wouldn't have to start at the bottom of the pay rung at OO, correct?

Seems weird that I feel incentivized to go this route, even though I ultimately want to go Skywest.
You never know what 2 years from now is going to hold. If you want to work at SkyWest just work for SkyWest... the QOL hit (commuting) for extra bonus money isn't worth it long run..
amcnd is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:39 AM
  #926  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by blindfayth
Soo if soft landings 2.0 is a thing, and I'm looking to get into the 121 field as a CFI building hours..



It seems like it wouldn't be a horrible idea to go somewhere like AWAC, collect the huge frontloaded bonuses money, work there for 2 years, then come to OO as a 2nd or 3rd year FO. While I wouldn't have seniority for base/schedule bidding, I wouldn't have to start at the bottom of the pay rung at OO, correct?



Seems weird that I feel incentivized to go this route, even though I ultimately want to go Skywest.


Well, considering upgrade times it may not pay to start over, even at 3 year FO pay. You can make it as a senior FO as a line holder, but reserve is about the worst thing about SkyWest.

Do it once, don't do it again.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Cazadores is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:44 AM
  #927  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blindfayth's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 367
Default

What if i have nothing tying me down, and I'm willing to move to wherever I get based, even if it's twice over a 3 year period?

Still a bad idea? Sorry for asking what's probably a stupid question. I'm new to this forum/industry.
blindfayth is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 08:48 AM
  #928  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,875
Default

Originally Posted by blindfayth
Soo if soft landings 2.0 is a thing, and I'm looking to get into the 121 field as a CFI building hours..

It seems like it wouldn't be a horrible idea to go somewhere like AWAC, collect the huge frontloaded bonuses money, work there for 2 years, then come to OO as a 2nd or 3rd year FO. While I wouldn't have seniority for base/schedule bidding, I wouldn't have to start at the bottom of the pay rung at OO, correct?

Seems weird that I feel incentivized to go this route, even though I ultimately want to go Skywest.
I don't think that math works out, but I'm assuming the Awac bonus is 60k.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:01 AM
  #929  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by blindfayth
What if i have nothing tying me down, and I'm willing to move to wherever I get based, even if it's twice over a 3 year period?



Still a bad idea? Sorry for asking what's probably a stupid question. I'm new to this forum/industry.


If you want to fly for AWAC, fly for AWAC. If you want to fly for SkyWest fly for SkyWest.

One thing to consider, at AWAC you will be off probation in a year, that's significant at an ALPA carrier. Being new you may not be considering the importance of time and seniority, the stress relief that comes with being a line holder, and the confidence of having experience with the tribal knowledge that comes with being around a year or two.

They're all regionals, if you think you want to job hop I'd find a good bonus, fly for a year or two, and start trying for an LCC or ACMI, in other words, keep moving up, not laterally. Otherwise, I'd say, find a regional you want to work for, take it for what it's worth, and move on to your dream job.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Cazadores is offline  
Old 07-12-2017, 09:03 AM
  #930  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blindfayth's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by Cazadores
If you want to fly for AWAC, fly for AWAC. If you want to fly for SkyWest fly for SkyWest.

One thing to consider, at AWAC you will be off probation in a year, that's significant at an ALPA carrier. Being new you may not be considering the importance of time and seniority, the stress relief that comes with being a line holder, and the confidence of having experience with the tribal knowledge that comes with being around a year or two.

They're all regionals, if you think you want to job hop I'd find a good bonus, fly for a year or two, and start trying for an LCC or ACMI, in other words, keep moving up, not laterally. Otherwise, I'd say, find a regional you want to work for, take it for what it's worth, and move on to your dream job.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Cool, thanks for the advice! Skywest it is! I'm really excited about being able to have an excuse to move back west someday.
blindfayth is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
61
06-11-2012 10:55 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices