Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
News on the new Skywest pay package >

News on the new Skywest pay package

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

News on the new Skywest pay package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2017, 04:44 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
I understand that so why don't we wait until we see if still does to get upset?
Because everyone knows exactly what is coming.
hawk21 is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 05:04 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
No coincidence at all. Same with the rumors of more aircraft. All out of the management playbook. It happens every time.


The only thing we need to hear now is if we don't take this pay package we will shrink.
It was sarcasm
Squallrider is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 05:29 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 2,019
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
LOL.

So, anyways, where is your guys evidence it's a 1% contract? History is all you got?

Why is there even a thread? We literally have nothing to talk about except argue what it could be....but I'm sorry I have to be here for a set amount of years to respond.
Dude... If you'd been here for the last pay package fiasco you'd know exactly what everyone else is talking about. You'll see what we mean. I promise.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 05:45 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Dude... If you'd been here for the last pay package fiasco you'd know exactly what everyone else is talking about. You'll see what we mean. I promise.
He's not the only bright eyed and bushy tailed new hire. Like him, I got in during a rising tide and so far haven't experienced the career misfortunes that many of my colleagues assuredly have.
While I have no complaints about the overall experience as a new hire , I do think that skywest has begun to fall behind on competitive compensation, and sure we may be filling classes but are they the best candidates or simply warm bodies that somehow manage to stumble their way through aqp? I'm hopeful skywest managment sees the value in investing in the pilot group to attract the last remaining best candidates.

Though I'm not holding my breath.
TimetoClimb is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:20 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: LAX ER
Posts: 1,606
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
Dude... If you'd been here for the last pay package fiasco you'd know exactly what everyone else is talking about. You'll see what we mean. I promise.
Our history of contract negotiations aren't hidden. My point wasn't to say history doesn't repeat itself. The point was people are arguing and fighting over an email that has no meaning. And we have an entire thread geared around talking about details of the email?! What details? I get it vote no because first offer is low ball.

Clearly I'm playing devils advocate that I don't have my pitchfork ready and attitude to fight everything on this forum?? I could really care less about first year pay. Anyone who came to this company for first year pay wasn't really smart. We've been the bottom of competition for a while so clearly assuming that's what I want is wrong. I have interests in pay for long term as well.
tcco94 is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:21 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
SkyW simply does not make the money to make it rain.
Do you want that 20K annual bonus that others get- A 50K bonus to each 4250 pilots on an average year wipes out every penny of profit this company makes. Dispatchers are in short supply and turning over to mainline just like pilots so they need more $. Mechanics are in the same boat so they need $.
Then their is Wall Street. They need bigger dividends and millions of dollars in crappy buy backs. The money isn't there.

Atlas Air Cargo pilots are exactly in the same boat as the rest of the contract world....the whole business is built on cheap labor.
Isn't that what companies were saying back when they paid $19/hour?
Rocksteady is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:23 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SMACFUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies
SkyW simply does not make the money to make it rain.
Do you want that 20K annual bonus that others get- A 50K bonus to each 4250 pilots on an average year wipes out every penny of profit this company makes. Dispatchers are in short supply and turning over to mainline just like pilots so they need more $. Mechanics are in the same boat so they need $.
Then their is Wall Street. They need bigger dividends and millions of dollars in crappy buy backs. The money isn't there.

Atlas Air Cargo pilots are exactly in the same boat as the rest of the contract world....the whole business is built on cheap labor.
Ding! Ding! Ding! 100% Correct
SMACFUM is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:34 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,875
Default

Originally Posted by Rocksteady
Isn't that what companies were saying back when they paid $19/hour?
Indeed, but if you read United's 10K they point out to investors that while they are purchasing fewer block hours of contract feed year over year the total cost of regional feed is increasing, negating any cost savings.
It's incremental.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:37 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

If you guys read the last InPrint Q1 2017, MT specifically talks about cost and economics being factors in securing new flying. This was basically him saying "hey, if we pay you less, we can get more flying."

SkyWest Airlines - InPrintQ1-2017online
zondaracer is offline  
Old 05-25-2017, 07:40 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
Our history of contract negotiations aren't hidden. My point wasn't to say history doesn't repeat itself. The point was people are arguing and fighting over an email that has no meaning. And we have an entire thread geared around talking about details of the email?! What details? I get it vote no because first offer is low ball.

Clearly I'm playing devils advocate that I don't have my pitchfork ready and attitude to fight everything on this forum?? I could really care less about first year pay. Anyone who came to this company for first year pay wasn't really smart. We've been the bottom of competition for a while so clearly assuming that's what I want is wrong. I have interests in pay for long term as well.
The only word you needed to read to see where this whole path was going was "extension". Case closed.
hawk21 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
61
06-11-2012 10:55 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices