Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
News on the new Skywest pay package >

News on the new Skywest pay package

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

News on the new Skywest pay package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2017, 06:51 PM
  #261  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
For the new guys...

A while back, SKW told the pilot group that we'd get the CRJ-700 if we agreed to a horrible pay package. If we voted it down, those places would go elsewhere.

After lots of debate, the package passed at 8 pm.

Perhaps one hour later, the -700s were announced, along with all the details as to partners, bases, etc.

Anyone with half a brain could see that the planes were coming here anyways, regardless of what the vote was. You don't secure a whole bunch of flying, and a whole new airframe, in an hour.

Bottom line? The typical management line is, 'accept this lousy agreement, or take a pay cut, and only then will you get more flying, or not lose flying.' These decisions are already made long before the vote, but management realizes that some of us are dumb enough to fall for it.

The amazing thing is that they keep using the same tactic and people keep buying into it.

Fully agree. We have a smart management team. And they see an opportunity to dominate the regional market. They will take it - regardless.
N1234 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:02 PM
  #262  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 802
Default

Originally Posted by N1234
Fully agree. We have a smart management team. And they see an opportunity to dominate the regional market. They will take it - regardless.
Have to say this is one of the best pay packages I've seen.

And I've seen them all.

Voting yes.

Lots of wheels in motion, right now!
Check Complete is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:06 PM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,252
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
For the new guys...

A while back, SKW told the pilot group that we'd get the CRJ-700 if we agreed to a horrible pay package. If we voted it down, those places would go elsewhere.

After lots of debate, the package passed at 8 pm.

Perhaps one hour later, the -700s were announced, along with all the details as to partners, bases, etc.

Anyone with half a brain could see that the planes were coming here anyways, regardless of what the vote was. You don't secure a whole bunch of flying, and a whole new airframe, in an hour.

Bottom line? The typical management line is, 'accept this lousy agreement, or take a pay cut, and only then will you get more flying, or not lose flying.' These decisions are already made long before the vote, but management realizes that some of us are dumb enough to fall for it.

The amazing thing is that they keep using the same tactic and people keep buying into it.
This isn't 2004.. This industry changes so fast!! Heck Mesa was still flying 1900's back then!! And after 9/11 was a weird time. And we were one of the few that didn't have some sort of trouble.. so if that was the worst of it. Consider us lucky.. most airline pilots were facing being on the street back then still..
amcnd is online now  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:29 PM
  #264  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by Turbosina
For the new guys...

A while back, SKW told the pilot group that we'd get the CRJ-700 if we agreed to a horrible pay package. If we voted it down, those places would go elsewhere.

After lots of debate, the package passed at 8 pm.

Perhaps one hour later, the -700s were announced, along with all the details as to partners, bases, etc.

Anyone with half a brain could see that the planes were coming here anyways, regardless of what the vote was. You don't secure a whole bunch of flying, and a whole new airframe, in an hour.

Bottom line? The typical management line is, 'accept this lousy agreement, or take a pay cut, and only then will you get more flying, or not lose flying.' These decisions are already made long before the vote, but management realizes that some of us are dumb enough to fall for it.

The amazing thing is that they keep using the same tactic and people keep buying into it.
Please...please everyone listen to this guy! He knows what he is talking about. We're going to grow regardless.

And those ppl jizzing about the 401k better be 15 yrs plus because if your anything less than 10 yrs with OO and your excited, I'm worried about you
Rocksteady is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:48 PM
  #265  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by 701EV
If the SkyWest pilots have any backbone you'll tell Chip you want ExpressJet contract plus 5%. There 4260 of you who may not realize how much power you have right now. In five years there wont be any regional airlines.

701EV
Look what's happening to XJT? Do you want that here? They came to us early and offered us a raise in order to project costs for new flying. I know it's a pilots job to complain about everything, but at some point you have to be thankful we don't have the same problems as most other regionals. If you want to make more, there are other companies out there who sell their own tickets. They can do this, a contract carrier is limitied in what they can offer.

SkyWest is a great place to be on this part of the career totem pole. The deal is fair for who we are. I know contracts are juicy meat for complaining, but in any other profession if a boss offered you a raise you would take it and say thank you.

The absence of QOL improvements was the only thing missing. That being said, our work rules (aside from reserve) aren't that bad to begin with.

This "get all you can" mentality has doomed other airlines in the past. Let's not have that happen here..
GearUpHeadDown is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:53 PM
  #266  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 146
Default

Originally Posted by GearUpHeadDown
Look what's happening to XJT? They came to us early and offered us a raise in order to project costs for new flying. I know it's a pilots job to complain about everything, but at some point you have to be thankful we don't have the same problems as most other regionals. If you want to make more, there are other companies out there who sell their own tickets. They can do this, a contract carrier is limitied in what they can offer.

SkyWest is a great place to be on this part of the career totem pole. The deal is fair for who we are. I know contracts are juicy meat for complaining, but in any other profession if a boss offered you a raise you would take it and say thank you.

The absence of QOL improvements was the only thing missing. That being said, our work rules (aside from reserve) aren't that bad to begin with.
Is this the FO from ASE living in a multi million dollar house telling us we aren't doctors and we deserve less ?
skiK2 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 08:11 PM
  #267  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by skiK2
Is this the FO from ASE living in a multi million dollar house telling us we aren't doctors and we deserve less ?
No...He's actually one of the few on this forum that make sense.
torpid0 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 09:05 PM
  #268  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 392
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Turbosina
For the new guys...

A while back, SKW told the pilot group that we'd get the CRJ-700 if we agreed to a horrible pay package. If we voted it down, those places would go elsewhere.

After lots of debate, the package passed at 8 pm.

Perhaps one hour later, the -700s were announced, along with all the details as to partners, bases, etc.

Anyone with half a brain could see that the planes were coming here anyways, regardless of what the vote was. You don't secure a whole bunch of flying, and a whole new airframe, in an hour.

Bottom line? The typical management line is, 'accept this lousy agreement, or take a pay cut, and only then will you get more flying, or not lose flying.' These decisions are already made long before the vote, but management realizes that some of us are dumb enough to fall for it.

The amazing thing is that they keep using the same tactic and people keep buying into it.

This is the best post I have read, the best reality check.
Turboprop is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:04 PM
  #269  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94
But why is the growth of our airline and extra flying opportunity dependent on the pay contract?
It's to maximize their margins. They want to have labor costs locked in for as long as possible before bidding for new flying.

But with such trivial gains and no improvements to things like reserve buffers there's no way we should be agreeing to anything more than a 2 year extension to the current agreement.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:11 PM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by skiK2
Is this the FO from ASE living in a multi million dollar house telling us we aren't doctors and we deserve less ?
No, I just choose to see things in their proper context. It's not as fun as complaining about how much a gold bar weighs, but it is what it is..

Last edited by GearUpHeadDown; 06-02-2017 at 11:29 PM.
GearUpHeadDown is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
61
06-11-2012 10:55 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices