Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
News on the new Skywest pay package >

News on the new Skywest pay package

Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

News on the new Skywest pay package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2017, 02:29 PM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,677
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I have no problem veering back to discussing the contents or suspects contents of the next contract. To say that all union talk is banned and deleting all related posts is wholly inappropriate.
Completely agree.
word302 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 02:29 PM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,677
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This rule, from the TOS:

Stay on topic as best you can, and don't hijack a topic - just start a new thread. Topics do tend to ebb and flow, but if the topic gets too far away from the primary point, start a new thread!
So just basically at your discretion? Smells funny.
word302 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 02:33 PM
  #183  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,277
Default

Originally Posted by word302
So just basically at your discretion? Smells funny.
No that's verbatim from the TOS. But yes mods do have some discretion kind of necessary for the job.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 02:37 PM
  #184  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 733
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
Most of the new flying will not be on the 175, skywest is working out a deal for at least 75 new 900s in a 70 seat configuration, a lot of the flying would be new delta west coast flying.
That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Are you intentionally trolling or is it accidental?

There is NO WAY SkyWest is buying factory new CRJs. Even if your theory/rumor/flamebait made any sense economically in the first place, to fly -900s with 70 seats, there is no reason on earth to do it with brand new planes. If anything, they would just take the -900s from ASA after they shut down next year and use them. But putting 70 seats in a -900 makes no sense economically since they could just do it WITH A CRJ -700! And again, there's a whole lot of them they can get their hands on.

So either you're trolling, clueless, or a management guy holding out a carrot. Either way, in my best Vinny Gambini voice "your theory don't hold wawtah".
ecam is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 03:11 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
You can doubt all you want, and I totally understand where your doubts are coming from, and i'll be happy to watch you eat your words when the new flying and purchase order is announced. The 900 just makes more sense right now. Bombardier is hurting for orders and capital right now! They are desperate to secure a large order of planes, and would be willing to offer a significant price cut for such a deal. In addition to this the new E2 does not meet scope requirements and there is still a line up for 175 orders. This makes dealing with the more desperate and accommodating Bombardier a much more appetizing prospect. The 900 when configured in 70 seats will allow for a much more comparable cabin feel to the 175 (yes the over head baggage space will still suck), but it allows for an immediate bump in capacity if scope ever gets relaxed on 76 seaters making SkyWest much more dynamic and able to respond to partners needs and wishes. Finally though, Chip likes cheap airplanes...
This rumor has been floating around for awhile now and has some traction these days. Would not be surprised whatsoever when/ if it is officially announced and everyone laughing now eats their words. I think this ultimately depends on how the next pay package ("extension") goes as stated by RJ.
hawk21 is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 03:19 PM
  #186  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 733
Default

Originally Posted by hawk21
I think this ultimately depends on how the next pay package ("extension") goes as stated by RJ.
So management IS on here handing out carrots. Sweet.
ecam is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 04:29 PM
  #187  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by ecam
So management IS on here handing out carrots. Sweet.
Why does it concern you? Aren't you at Allegiant?
Duesenflieger is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 04:32 PM
  #188  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 64
Default

ExpressJet pilots just received retention bonuses today. 10,000 for new hires and current FOs. Captains only get 3,000. United is about to sign a long-term extension on the E145. Not sure how ExpressJet plans on staffing the 100 plus aircraft? Pilots don't want to work there. This could be a costly mistake by SkyWest management, unless they plan on opening up their wallets to pay a significant amount of money to attract and retain pilots. ALPA is working with ExpressJet to increase hourly pay and improve QOL...possibly more bonuses in the near future.
Skyw is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 04:38 PM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

I'd be a little ticked as a captain.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 06-01-2017, 04:43 PM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by Skyw
ExpressJet pilots just received retention bonuses today. 10,000 for new hires and current FOs. Captains only get 3,000. United is about to sign a long-term extension on the E145. Not sure how ExpressJet plans on staffing the 100 plus aircraft? Pilots don't want to work there. This could be a costly mistake by SkyWest management, unless they plan on opening up their wallets to pay a significant amount of money to attract and retain pilots. ALPA is working with ExpressJet to increase hourly pay and improve QOL...possibly more bonuses in the near future.
It's actually $8500 for FOs and $1500 for CAs, on top of the previously offered "profit sharing", to be paid out at the end of the year. It's a cute gesture, but it won't keep anyone from jumping off the sinking ship. I wouldn't​ put any stock in any long term extension of our 145s. They've given our good airframes to the bottom feeders, and what planes are left at XJT are on life support. These planes probably don't have 5 years left in them.

Almighty mods, forgive me for the thread drift, carry on...
AboveMins is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
notEnuf
Delta
238
12-22-2015 04:20 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
61
06-11-2012 10:55 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices