News on the new Skywest pay package
06-01-2017, 09:27 AM
#171
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,290
The Canucks pretty much gave every RJ operator the middle finger for support when they put all their efforts behind the much touted CS series.
I'd be surprised to see the biggest operator of CRJ's go back to Canada for anything.
I'd be surprised to see the biggest operator of CRJ's go back to Canada for anything.
06-01-2017, 09:41 AM
#172
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
I also doubt that anyone would buy new 900's at this time. Maybe we are picking up some used ones but I cannot see us placing an order for new 900's.
06-01-2017, 11:19 AM
#173
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,276
Training delays are not controversial and do not incite irrational religious fervor, so they can stay. Anything more about unions goes.
06-01-2017, 11:31 AM
#174
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,677
06-01-2017, 01:54 PM
#175
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Former Airline Captain
Posts: 48
I did not listen to today's conference call, but from RJ's notes, the details of the pay package could be out as early as tomorrow...
Then, we can see whether all the rumors/angst/speculation was worth it.
I'm looking forward to seeing the details.
BTW, I'm glad our SAPA reps voted to let us see it and vote on it. I don't think that the reps voting to let us see it implies that ALL of them support the agreement. We'll see how that plays out in any roadshows/messages from them.
We can always vote it down and see what the second offer is like...at least we're opening two new bases, NOT tied to any vote.
Then, we can see whether all the rumors/angst/speculation was worth it.
I'm looking forward to seeing the details.
BTW, I'm glad our SAPA reps voted to let us see it and vote on it. I don't think that the reps voting to let us see it implies that ALL of them support the agreement. We'll see how that plays out in any roadshows/messages from them.
We can always vote it down and see what the second offer is like...at least we're opening two new bases, NOT tied to any vote.
06-01-2017, 01:58 PM
#176
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 615
06-01-2017, 02:13 PM
#177
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Please point to the violation of terms of service. Unions are not religion and therefore not a violation. In fact, union discussion is expressly approved discussion as you have an entire forum dedicated to just discussing unions. I didn't realize things could be deleted because rickair disagreed with the non-prohibited content. Sounds like I need to become a moderator so I can delete comments I disagree with. Where do I sign up?
Stay on topic as best you can, and don't hijack a topic - just start a new thread. Topics do tend to ebb and flow, but if the topic gets too far away from the primary point, start a new thread!
Forum Rules
06-01-2017, 02:16 PM
#178
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,276
Stay on topic as best you can, and don't hijack a topic - just start a new thread. Topics do tend to ebb and flow, but if the topic gets too far away from the primary point, start a new thread!
06-01-2017, 02:17 PM
#179
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,580
I think that this section of the forum rules would apply:
One question about training delays falls under the "ebb and flow" but five pages of union arguments definitely strays too far away from the primary point.
Forum Rules
One question about training delays falls under the "ebb and flow" but five pages of union arguments definitely strays too far away from the primary point.
Forum Rules
06-01-2017, 02:28 PM
#180
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,677
I did not listen to today's conference call, but from RJ's notes, the details of the pay package could be out as early as tomorrow...
Then, we can see whether all the rumors/angst/speculation was worth it.
I'm looking forward to seeing the details.
BTW, I'm glad our SAPA reps voted to let us see it and vote on it. I don't think that the reps voting to let us see it implies that ALL of them support the agreement. We'll see how that plays out in any roadshows/messages from them.
We can always vote it down and see what the second offer is like...at least we're opening two new bases, NOT tied to any vote.
Then, we can see whether all the rumors/angst/speculation was worth it.
I'm looking forward to seeing the details.
BTW, I'm glad our SAPA reps voted to let us see it and vote on it. I don't think that the reps voting to let us see it implies that ALL of them support the agreement. We'll see how that plays out in any roadshows/messages from them.
We can always vote it down and see what the second offer is like...at least we're opening two new bases, NOT tied to any vote.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
