Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
American 767 fire at Chicago O'Hare >

American 767 fire at Chicago O'Hare

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

American 767 fire at Chicago O'Hare

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2016, 06:05 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by ME109G
For more than 20 years, anytime going for training CAE, Flight Safety, Delta or AA facilities I've been asking about this V1 cut in case of fire.

Always I've been told before V1 stop, after V1 continue. Which in the sim works beautiful. I tried and try to advocate differently. And always I bring up the Concorde scenario. They took off, all dead. If the pilots would have put the plane streaight ahead, maybe some people will be alive today. Pilots crucified for not following procedure, but some people alive.

Same with this AA plane. They were lucky for catching the fire before V1. Otherwise all would be dead now. And that's because the stupid procedure we learn vis-a-vis V1 cuts.

I survived a plane fire 30 years ago. In my book during an engine fire the only safer place is on the ground. This crop flying around and making poetry with an engine on fire doesn't cut it for me. Just sayn'
Go back and reread the definition of V1.

Concord crash was alluded to, they had no idea they were in the situation they were in. They also had a rotation speed of something like 240 knots. Best base they would've gone off the end at probably 200 knots. There are a whole lot of reasons you go airborne at V1 with an engine fire, and very VERY few you try and stop.
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 06:57 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by ME109G
For more than 20 years, anytime going for training CAE, Flight Safety, Delta or AA facilities I've been asking about this V1 cut in case of fire.

Always I've been told before V1 stop, after V1 continue. Which in the sim works beautiful. I tried and try to advocate differently. And always I bring up the Concorde scenario. They took off, all dead. If the pilots would have put the plane streaight ahead, maybe some people will be alive today. Pilots crucified for not following procedure, but some people alive.

Same with this AA plane. They were lucky for catching the fire before V1. Otherwise all would be dead now. And that's because the stupid procedure we learn vis-a-vis V1 cuts.

I survived a plane fire 30 years ago. In my book during an engine fire the only safer place is on the ground. This crop flying around and making poetry with an engine on fire doesn't cut it for me. Just sayn'
So you're one of those guys that thinks you know a better way and you're going to plant a plane back on the ground after rotation when it is flyable? I hope you're solo at the time. Ending failures and fires - even un-contained failures - do not render an airplane un-flyable.

After a hundred years of engine failures, a lot of people who are a lot smarter than you and I have had plenty of opportunities to figure this engine failure thing out. There is a reason that aviation has gotten as safe as it is today and trying to reinvent the wheel is best left to the experts.

At the very least, if you think you have a better idea, don't try it out with innocent people sitting behind you. Go rent a twin and be a maverick all by yourself.
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 07:20 AM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,057
Default

Originally Posted by ME109G
For more than 20 years, anytime going for training CAE, Flight Safety, Delta or AA facilities I've been asking about this V1 cut in case of fire.

Always I've been told before V1 stop, after V1 continue. Which in the sim works beautiful. I tried and try to advocate differently. And always I bring up the Concorde scenario. They took off, all dead. If the pilots would have put the plane streaight ahead, maybe some people will be alive today. Pilots crucified for not following procedure, but some people alive.

Same with this AA plane. They were lucky for catching the fire before V1. Otherwise all would be dead now. And that's because the stupid procedure we learn vis-a-vis V1 cuts.

I survived a plane fire 30 years ago. In my book during an engine fire the only safer place is on the ground. This crop flying around and making poetry with an engine on fire doesn't cut it for me. Just sayn'
Depends.

Very long runway, relatively small/light airplane? In that case V1 = Vr . If you're not airborne you can reasonably just put the nose back down and stop.

Otherwise, you're making it up as you go and have to assume you're going off the end and it will be ugly. How do you assess which is worse? Apparently the FAA thinks statistically going flying is safer, and I don't have any hard science to refute that, so that's what I'll do.

If tower says "your wing is on fire" then I guess I'll crank it around for a very short downwind, turn final over the ALSF and plop it right on.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 08:56 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bilsch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: FAA ATSI VSRP ERC
Posts: 218
Default

Interestingly, AA 383 has a grim history:

Crash of AA Flight 383 | ExploreKYHistory

Crash of AA Flight 383
By Becky Riddle
Historical Marker #2343 commemorates American Airlines flight #383, which crashed in Boone County on November 8, 1965, as it was landing at the Greater Cincinnati Airport in Constance.

American Airlines flight 383, a Boeing 727, was a non-stop flight from LaGuardia Airport (New York) to the Greater Cincinnati Airport. The airplane departed New York at 5:38 pm and was scheduled to arrive in Cincinnati around 7:00 pm. The plane was flown by veteran pilot, Captain Dan Teelin, who had been with American Airlines for over 10 years and, Captain William J. O’Neil, who was being upgraded to captain on the 727.

It was a routine flight and at 6:57 pm, the flight crew notified Cincinnati it was on its final approach. The tower notified Captain Teelin that there was rain in the area, and the captain relayed that the visibility was getting bad. The tower told the crew that the runway lights were on high, but the airplane crashed into a wooded hillside two miles north of the runway 5 seconds later. The plane broke apart and went up in flames. There were two survivors in the front of the plane and two in the back, but the other 58 passengers perished.
Bilsch is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 09:15 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: EZ on rudders, not a C-130...
Posts: 27
Default

New to commercial aviation (but retired from the USAF). Both Emirates and now this AA have passengers grabbing personal gear from overheads and otherwise being stupid. I asked my FA what they are told to do if a pax is doing idiot things like this during an emergency. I was surprised that they were basically limited to verbal chastisement. And I don't recall much instruction on this in my own recent company ground school.

Contrast that to the few evacs I've done over my military career; mil crews and pax get it straight in their heads, get out!

I'm curious if there is anything more than verbal chastisement being discussed. Totally noobie speculation, but maybe having an emergency lock on overheads during critical phases of flight might be a thing.

idk... just glad no one was seriously injured or killed.
cybirr is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 11:07 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
ME109G's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 49
Default

I know I deal here with pilots extraordinaires knowing all and I'm just an ignorant 20000 hours novice.

However, my intention was to give some food for thoughts when dealing with fire.

Many years ago when I had an engine fires at one of the engine I made it out safe by getting on the ground in 25 seconds from 1500 feet. On a farm. The plane was completely burnt at second 47. I had to pull the other guy out with second degree burns. No other people on board, just the two of us. He survived and still thanks me today.

Again if I take off out of more that 10000 feet runway and I get an engine fire after V1 my name is straight ahead. You guys do whatever you consider best for your career. To me important is to walk away alive.

Last edited by ME109G; 10-29-2016 at 11:28 AM.
ME109G is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 11:17 AM
  #27  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,609
Default

Originally Posted by ME109G
Again if I take off out of more that 10000 feet runway and I get an engine fire after V1 my name is straight ahead. You guys do whatever you consider best for your career.
In what kind of aircraft?

A CJ3 would be a much different animal than a widebody doing an assumed temp/derate takeoff.
BoilerUP is online now  
Old 10-29-2016, 12:50 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Many variables that can create an outside the typical V1 cut or fire.

AA 181 at ORD.....the crew followed the procedure of pitching up to attain V2 after they "lost" the #1 engine.
The plane soon departed controlled flight and crashed.

You can't blame the crew cause they simply thought the #1 engine had failed, not departed the airplane and damaged hydraulic lines in the process.

You always look like the hero when you go of the procedure reservation and win. But you become the scapegoat when you lose or even break even.

In the end of it all, percentages lend to you not having a AA181 or UA292 type scenarios.
RI830 is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 01:25 PM
  #29  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,057
Default

Originally Posted by Bilsch
Interestingly, AA 383 has a grim history:
Maybe they shouldn't have re-used that number. The public may have long since forgotten but apparently Murphy didn't...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 01:40 PM
  #30  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,057
Default

Originally Posted by cybirr
New to commercial aviation (but retired from the USAF). Both Emirates and now this AA have passengers grabbing personal gear from overheads and otherwise being stupid. I asked my FA what they are told to do if a pax is doing idiot things like this during an emergency. I was surprised that they were basically limited to verbal chastisement. And I don't recall much instruction on this in my own recent company ground school.

Contrast that to the few evacs I've done over my military career; mil crews and pax get it straight in their heads, get out!

I'm curious if there is anything more than verbal chastisement being discussed. Totally noobie speculation, but maybe having an emergency lock on overheads during critical phases of flight might be a thing.

idk... just glad no one was seriously injured or killed.
Cattle Prods?
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAirBear
Safety
5
10-28-2016 03:01 PM
Oberon
Major
39
09-28-2014 07:49 PM
Wildmanny
Cargo
184
04-16-2014 05:27 PM
Tsuda
American
0
12-18-2011 06:10 PM
ryane946
Major
27
12-31-2006 06:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices