Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 07:05 AM
  #771  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fluglehrer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Position: Pipers & RV-12
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by N9373M
We're in agreement - I did not do a good job trying to convey my disgust with today's "journalism". Sources are not vetted, and it's better to be first than be correct.
Sum Ting Wong with that?
Fluglehrer is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 08:08 AM
  #772  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
If this is offered as a pathetic excuse for the media's collective stupidity and self exemption from factual reporting...throw me in ERICK's sociopath bucket.



The only difference is that I just want to "harm a large group of REPORTERS."
Reporters don't seem, in general, to know a lot about science. I don't think their post-secondary education is rich in courses that included hard science courses and critical thinking. Few would really understand the scientific method, basic statistics, and the intro to logic that you get in some of those courses.
Erick is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 09:48 AM
  #773  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

This is still an airline pilot forum, right?
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 09:51 AM
  #774  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Why is it that the 777 pilots used by the media never expand upon the fact that on a FBW aircraft, the autopilot is, essentially, never "off" and the flight control computers are not located together or even in the E&E compartment?
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 12:50 PM
  #775  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRM114's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 639
Default

Originally Posted by Dougdrvr
Why is it that the 777 pilots used by the media never expand upon the fact that on a FBW aircraft, the autopilot is, essentially, never "off" and the flight control computers are not located together or even in the E&E compartment?
The "media" has no interest in how a 777 works, they just want the sound bites that will sell ad space. Can you imagine listening to some dude from simulator land drone on about the ADIRU, 629 bus, PFCs, ACEs, and Redundancy Management? No way that discussion would sell cat food or tampons!
CRM114 is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 01:49 PM
  #776  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by CRM114
The "media" has no interest in how a 777 works, they just want the sound bites that will sell ad space. Can you imagine listening to some dude from simulator land drone on about the ADIRU, 629 bus, PFCs, ACEs, and Redundancy Management? No way that discussion would sell cat food or tampons!
CNN could at least get a real life 777 pilot/instructor who has actually flown the aircraft in revenue service (and looks the part - think silver haired dude in a uniform) instead of the dude in t-shirt, stash, and goatee that looks like he should be selling stolen hubcaps. Sim instructor - really? MS Flight Sim?

Having this dude together with Anderson Cooper doing his handsome earnest serious thing (is that LeTigre?) has got to be one of the most absurd things I've seen on the news in a long time, the tragedy not withstanding.

Major fail for CNN.

Last edited by Fly4hire; 03-21-2014 at 02:21 PM.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 02:27 PM
  #777  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by LightAttack
The complaints about the newbies posting here isn't that they are "listening", the problem is that they are putting down stakes and making ridiculous pronouncements as to what happened.

You say you are an "experimental psychologist", whatever that is. If you are a psychologist, you, more than we, would understand human behavior. If one of the crew took over and committed "suicide" by running the jet out of gas after disabling/killing everyone else by depressurizing the plane long enough to deplete the onboard oxygen, why? Why fly for hours after taking over the plane instead of pointing it at the deck - as has been done before?

You're the psychologist, if it were terrorism, why has there been no pronouncement by some terrorist group? They live for that crap. Educate us.
I'll bite on that. I've been involved in numerous suicide investigations. In only one did the person go off into the middle of nowhere and leave no trace of where to find him - and even he used his phone, allowing us to locate him by the phone.
If one pilot had suicide plans and locked the other out, the other and the rest of the passengers would have had many hours to react, if other information is correct (like staying airborne for hours.)
If one pilot immobilized the other before flying into the yonder, then the remaining attendants and pax still had hours to realize something was amiss and react. I don't buy that not one person would have sent a text which eventually got picked up, especially since event apparently began near land. I don't think it is probable that no one on the flight had a sat phone or device that would have picked up something.
There just seem to be way too many "what ifs" in that scenario. Suicidal persons who drag out the event are not completely sure of their course of action, in my experience. Four to seven hours would have been a long, long time to contemplate and be dissuaded. It could happen, but it would be highly unusual in my experience.

Terrorism? Those criminals don't seem to be much different than any other - they generally cannot keep their mouths shut. If our "intelligence" is such a failure that they picked up no clues before or afterwards of such an "accomplishment" for terrorists, we will be in a world of trouble for their failure. I find it hard to believe there would be that many failures and omissions. Possible? Yes. Probable? No.

The only certainty I've seen is that there's a whole lot we don't know. The other certainty I'll bank on is that, regardless of the outcome, flights coming/going here at least will see some changes: constant gps, transponders that can't be disabled, several hours of cockpit recording instead of two hour loops, and more pilot scrutiny. That will be a shame - you already suffer extreme scrutiny due to the actions of a few, just like I do. If your profession is like mine, the last people they will ask for input will be the pilots.

All of this is simply my opinion and I reserve the right to change my mind and be wrong!
mournlight is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 02:41 PM
  #778  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
CNN could at least get a real life 777 pilot/instructor who has actually flown the aircraft in revenue service (and looks the part - think silver haired dude in a uniform) instead of the dude in t-shirt, stash, and goatee that looks like he should be selling stolen hubcaps. Sim instructor - really? MS Flight Sim?

Having this dude together with Anderson Cooper doing his handsome earnest serious thing (is that LeTigre?) has got to be one of the most absurd things I've seen on the news in a long time, the tragedy not withstanding.

Major fail for CNN.
The missing airplane has been the only thing that has managed to elevate CNNs ratings. Some of you guys must like Anderson Cooper with the intense look.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 03:26 PM
  #779  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
We have yet to hear this theory, but I'm sure it's coming, MSNBC perhaps???

Oh, come on!!! You're just as bad as the media.

That airplane appears to be an F-86 and probably weighs under 15,000 lbs. If Godzilla was going to hold a 777, he would need two hands. Photoshop
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 03:52 PM
  #780  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Mostly Economy
Posts: 19
Default

Just read the flight conversation transcript published by The Telegraph (Revealed: the final 54 minutes of communication from MH370 - Telegraph).

At 00:42:62 KL Airport tells MH370 it has entered KL Radar 132.6, to which the co-pilot responds with a "132.6 MH370 copies that", style consistent. Yet when asked by KL Radar to connect with Hu Chi Ming City 120.9 the co-pilot simply responds with "All right good night" - does not copy, inconsistent style with prior exchange. Indication of someone else at this seat?
Taped2Seat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices