Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Dual Engine Failure blamed for MD-80 crash >

Dual Engine Failure blamed for MD-80 crash

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Dual Engine Failure blamed for MD-80 crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2012, 08:56 PM
  #1  
Can't abide NAI
Thread Starter
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Default Dual Engine Failure blamed for MD-80 crash

Interesting... given the lack of obvious causes ...
A preliminary report on the June 3 crash (ATW Daily News, June 5) released by the AIC does not reach a conclusion as to why the MD-83’s two Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219 engines each experienced “a total loss of power” during final approach. It noted an examination of maintenance records and fuel used by the flight showed the aircraft had enough fuel and it was not contaminated.
“The airplane was on the fourth flight segment of the day, consisting of two round-trips between Lagos [LOS] and Abuja,” the AIC report, completed with assistance from the US National Transportation Safety Board, stated. “The accident occurred during the return leg of the second trip. [Flight] 992 was on final approach for runway 18R at LOS when the crew reported the total loss of power.”
The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) has about 31 minutes of recordings from the MD-83’s pilots, and reveals that they were engaged in pre-landing tasks including deployment of the slats and extension of the flaps and landing gear.
As this was happening, according to the CVR transcript, the first officer asked, “Both engines coming up?” The captain replied, “Negative.” They then radioed an emergency distress call stating “dual engine failure” and “negative response from throttle."
The aircraft “crashed in a residential area about 5.8 mi. north of LOS,” the AIC report said. “The airplane wreckage was on approximately the extended centerline of runway 18R. During the impact sequence, the airplane struck an incomplete building, two trees and three buildings. The wreckage was confined, with the separated tail section and engines located at the beginning of the debris field. The airplane was mostly consumed by post-crash fire.”
According to Flight Safety Foundation’s Aviation Safety Network, wind at the time of the crash was just 7 knots, visibility was 10 km.-plus and there were “scatter[ed] clouds at 1,400 ft.”
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-16-2012, 10:34 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
detpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Trying not to crash
Posts: 1,260
Default

Ouch! I am really curious to see what they determine, and if it affects the entire fleet. What a crappy situation to be in.
detpilot is offline  
Old 07-17-2012, 02:55 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: Boeing/Right
Posts: 61
Default

From the report:

The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) retained about 31
minutes of the flight and starts about 1515 at which time
the captain and first officer were in a discussion of a nonnormal
condition regarding the correlation between the
engine throttle setting and an engine power indication3.
However, they did not voice concerns then that the
condition would affect the continuation of the flight. The
flight crew continued to monitor the condition and became
increasingly concerned as the flight transition through the
initial descent from cruise altitude at 1522 and the
subsequent approach phase.
Baxter is offline  
Old 07-17-2012, 06:32 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Default

The captain (55, ATPL, 18,116 hours total experience, 7,461 hours on type) had been employed with Dana Air since Mar 14th 2012, the first officer (34, CPL, 1,143 hours total, 808 hours on type) had been hired by Dana Air in January 2011.

Just WOW!!!!
Zoot Suit is offline  
Old 07-17-2012, 09:20 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawker Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Toilet warmer.
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by Zoot Suit
The captain (55, ATPL, 18,116 hours total experience, 7,461 hours on type) had been employed with Dana Air since Mar 14th 2012, the first officer (34, CPL, 1,143 hours total, 808 hours on type) had been hired by Dana Air in January 2011.

Just WOW!!!!
Could the airplane have experienced the same issue as that 777 into Heathrow?
Hawker Driver is offline  
Old 07-17-2012, 01:01 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 524
Default

Originally Posted by Zoot Suit
The captain (55, ATPL, 18,116 hours total experience, 7,461 hours on type) had been employed with Dana Air since Mar 14th 2012, the first officer (34, CPL, 1,143 hours total, 808 hours on type) had been hired by Dana Air in January 2011.

Just WOW!!!!
Was the FO a local? 335 TT when he/she was hired??? I second your WOW!!! Perhaps others can chime in with more info about Dana Air.
gearcrankr is offline  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:38 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

Originally Posted by Hawker Driver
Could the airplane have experienced the same issue as that 777 into Heathrow?
BA had ice in the fuel/oil heat exchangers. I think it'd be hard to get the fuel temp below freezing on a 300 mile flight on the equator.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-18-2012, 06:08 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawker Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Toilet warmer.
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
BA had ice in the fuel/oil heat exchangers. I think it'd be hard to get the fuel temp below freezing on a 300 mile flight on the equator.
Thanks for that.
Hawker Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
elliott85
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-30-2007 04:22 PM
Puckhead
Flight Schools and Training
16
08-02-2007 07:55 PM
CRJflyer32
Regional
51
01-28-2007 07:00 PM
Jakob
Hangar Talk
5
01-13-2007 09:21 AM
HSLD
Your Photos and Videos
6
11-05-2006 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices