Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
NTSB- Delta B767 taxiway landing ATL >

NTSB- Delta B767 taxiway landing ATL

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

NTSB- Delta B767 taxiway landing ATL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2010, 07:43 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by tortue
I wonder if its possible to reconfigure a sim to have it "move" you offset of a runway a few hundred feet above while you're about to touchdown to an adjacent taxiway to see the reaction. The idea being to simulate the psychological experience of where you totally believed you were lined up and over the threshold but at the last few seconds were not to see if you'd go around or just plant it where it was. Would be interesting to try it at 50 above, 100 above, etc.
Or just remove all semblance of runway markings, TDZ markers, numbers, centerline, piano keys, etc, and try to observe the same thing. You know, like something might not be quite right.

It's not like there aren't enough lights to illuminate that stuff, even in night/VFR conditions.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 11-17-2010, 08:14 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Fero's
Posts: 472
Default

So, am I reading this right? Did these two fly a 10 hour all nighter with no breaks? The LCA was the third pilot and was unable to perform after his, (first), break.

If so, four seconds is very little time. Fatigue may be the real issue here.
chuckyt1 is offline  
Old 11-18-2010, 09:07 AM
  #13  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1
If so, four seconds is very little time. Fatigue may be the real issue here.
No, that couldn't be the case. Clearly the NTSB has less insight and understanding of this event than posters here on APC.

Jeeze, the NTSB is finally starting to recognize what we've all known for years, and we still have people second guessing both the crew and the NTSB!
bcrosier is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 04:07 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,704
Default

The fact the crew was released back to duty with a light punishment came down to two things. First there were numerous safety complaints by pilots on file that the new taxiway LED lighting appeared like a runway from the air and looked like white lights. The second was that when the FAA tried to recreate the event their own pilots pilots lined up on the taxi way also without intending to. Its a good lesson to all pilots that if you see something wrong put in a safety report. It may help save someone else later.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The fact the crew was released back to duty with a light punishment came down to two things. First there were numerous safety complaints by pilots on file that the new taxiway LED lighting appeared like a runway from the air and looked like white lights. The second was that when the FAA tried to recreate the event their own pilots pilots lined up on the taxi way also without intending to. Its a good lesson to all pilots that if you see something wrong put in a safety report. It may help save someone else later.
Key factor folks. The FAA's boys did it too.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 11:41 AM
  #16  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Why no go-around?
Gee, IDK. Maybe the extremely ill LCA they declared an emergency for? Extreme fatigue due to having to fly a 10 hour all nighter with no break? Just to name a few.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 11:58 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Key factor folks. The FAA's boys did it too.
Do you know who were these pilots from the FAA that did this?
Are we talking NTSB investigators or Flight Check?
I didn't read the entire NTSB report.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-29-2010, 01:22 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The fact the crew was released back to duty with a light punishment came down to two things. First there were numerous safety complaints by pilots on file that the new taxiway LED lighting appeared like a runway from the air and looked like white lights. The second was that when the FAA tried to recreate the event their own pilots pilots lined up on the taxi way also without intending to. Its a good lesson to all pilots that if you see something wrong put in a safety report. It may help save someone else later.
Originally Posted by johnso29
Key factor folks. The FAA's boys did it too.
I found the answer through some digging.
A little clarification.....the FAA's Flight Check did recreate the situation.
They didn't 'unknowingly' line up on the taxiway as the wording of the above posts led me to believe. During the recreation, they noted some definite environmental/airport lighting/signage factors which would have contributed to the confusion.
I will agree now having seen some video and such that it was tough conditions that aircrew found themselves in and I'm glad that everything worked out OK for all.
That's all I have to say about that

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-29-2010, 01:24 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Gee, IDK. Maybe the extremely ill LCA they declared an emergency for? Extreme fatigue due to having to fly a 10 hour all nighter with no break? Just to name a few.
And the little RJ that they didn't see on the taxiway because they were so alert?

Sorry, not buying that this was a good decision to knowingly land on a taxiway. They got lucky.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 11-29-2010, 02:19 PM
  #20  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

Absolutely agree they got lucky - how often are the taxiways in ATL vacant?

The point being, finally the NTSB is starting to look behind the pointless label of pilot error. No $#!+ Sherlock, of course there is often a pilot error involved, the REAL question is WHY did the pilot make the error, and what needs to be done to prevent it from happening in the future.
bcrosier is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsjohnson2
Major
369
10-22-2009 03:57 PM
MX727
Cargo
16
02-24-2009 10:30 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 07:11 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 08:25 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices