Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Elmendorf C-17 crashes in Air Show >

Elmendorf C-17 crashes in Air Show

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Elmendorf C-17 crashes in Air Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2010, 01:10 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 351
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
The only thing more sickening than the video, are the comments.
Are you referring to comments on this site? If so, I don't understand.
EasternATC is offline  
Old 12-14-2010, 01:50 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,263
Default

Originally Posted by EasternATC
Are you referring to comments on this site? If so, I don't understand.
Sorry, no below the video on youtube.
Grumble is offline  
Old 12-14-2010, 05:04 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 351
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Sorry, no below the video on youtube.
OK. I've learned to pay them no mind, no matter what the subject.
EasternATC is offline  
Old 12-14-2010, 08:39 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 134
Default

Its sad to see that video knowing several people lost their lives,,,,,

But its also sad knowing that this accident was completely avoidable.

Having once been in the AF and having the luxury of working on 17 as a civie, i just cant believe we still have these kinds of mishaps

FatBoy nailed it,,,,the flaps had just gone full up for "maybe" 2 seconds before the aircraft is banked right hard....with an aircraft that uses spoilers for roll mind you......sucks.......textbook preventable aircraft crash.....

The ONLY glimmer of hope is that the Air Force Released this video so we can learn from others mistakes
doublerjay is offline  
Old 12-14-2010, 08:47 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 134
Default

Originally Posted by detpilot
Understood. The odd thing to me, is that up to the end of the video, when they're losing altitude rapidly, the aircraft's performance (while spectacular) doesn't look any more extreme than the other C-17 demo's I've seen. I was also under the impression that the C-17's fly by wire had airbus style protections from stalling, etc... but obviously not. Thanks for the insight.
Dont take offense please,,,,but the only thing spectacular is that at a professional military trained aircrew allowed themselves to stall an aircraft too close to the ground to recover. They probably applied full opposite aileron and maybe rudder, but that prob made it worse.
doublerjay is offline  
Old 12-14-2010, 09:52 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
detpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Trying not to crash
Posts: 1,260
Default

Originally Posted by doublerjay
Dont take offense please,,,,but the only thing spectacular is that at a professional military trained aircrew allowed themselves to stall an aircraft too close to the ground to recover. They probably applied full opposite aileron and maybe rudder, but that prob made it worse.
No offense taken, I was just noting that the takeoff was spectacular for an aircraft of this size, like most airshow C-17 takeoffs are.
detpilot is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 08:19 AM
  #47  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,896
Default

Not sure if it's been posted, but the AIB is out. If you don't wish to read it all, fly within the limits of your aircraft and if your aircraft stall system is telling you that you are stalling...recover!

Pacific Air Forces - AIB Reports
crewdawg is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 11:17 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,263
Default

Wow, sad in so many ways. I'm surprised this is published for public knowledge. Whats the USAF's policy on this? The Navy's SIR is usually confidential.
Grumble is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 11:32 AM
  #49  
Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,896
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Wow, sad in so many ways. I'm surprised this is published for public knowledge. Whats the USAF's policy on this? The Navy's SIR is usually confidential.
AIB = Releasable (Pins blame)

SIB = Releasable only to proper safety channels. (Tries to stop it from happening again)
crewdawg is offline  
Old 12-17-2010, 12:05 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
Wow, sad in so many ways. I'm surprised this is published for public knowledge. Whats the USAF's policy on this? The Navy's SIR is usually confidential.
Suppose to be kept under wraps right? I guess there might have been a few - but it certainly isn't Ops standard wouldn't you agree?
I don't remember one ever being released (with authority)
Of course I'm referring to Hultgreen here.
Remember when a SIR was never conducted on the Italian EA-6B/cable car mishap because the President at the time stated that ALL info would be shared?
JagMan - releaseable.

Grumble - you said a mouth full here. Sad, sad, sad.
It is just painful to read.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lwaddle
Hiring News
24
04-15-2018 03:22 PM
ryan1234
Technical
49
11-09-2009 08:06 AM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
2
05-23-2009 03:00 AM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 06:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices