Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
SWA Low Altitude Alert-TPA >

SWA Low Altitude Alert-TPA

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

SWA Low Altitude Alert-TPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2024, 08:08 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Saw a report that said with the altimeter setting, apparently how ADS-B might always be based on 29.92, the lowest altitude might have been closer to 370'. The investigation will provide the final answer. Regardless way to low.
Yes. So probably not the near-catastrophic miss it's been made out to be. More like got unstable and went around. Although it did seem like the tower caught it, not the crew. Presumably GPWS would have chimed in eventually.

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Sounds like the old 'setting minimums while not in VNAV PTH' or getting out of VNAV PTH while the minimums are set. Seen it a couple of times and it's been perhaps the greatest risk to modern airline aviation for years.
Yes. I've got multiple transport types and a few years doing this. VNAV PATH makes me nervous on approach, I watch it like a hawk. If you're in PATH (or think you are) with the dirt dialed, better pay attention.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-24-2024, 07:34 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yes. So probably not the near-catastrophic miss it's been made out to be. More like got unstable and went around. Although it did seem like the tower caught it, not the crew. Presumably GPWS would have chimed in eventually.



Yes. I've got multiple transport types and a few years doing this. VNAV PATH makes me nervous on approach, I watch it like a hawk. If you're in PATH (or think you are) with the dirt dialed, better pay attention.
Which is why Collins VGP in the types I flew so nice--every RNAV approach looks like an ILS. Arm APPR and VNAV, when the vertical mode captures (BARO or LPV), set the missed approach and done. "setting dirt" is only for the visual approach mode.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 06:34 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
"setting dirt" is only for the visual approach mode.
And by "setting dirt" you mean 0? Honest question. Because why would you do that if you can just set 500' and at least have one last THIN layer of protection?

I don't understand why 0 would ever be selected. Ever.
zerozero is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 10:45 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero
And by "setting dirt" you mean 0? Honest question. Because why would you do that if you can just set 500' and at least have one last THIN layer of protection?

I don't understand why 0 would ever be selected. Ever.
This is Collins-specific and maybe type specific. In any approach with a vertical guidance (ILS, LPV, Baro VNAV) once the vertical guidance is captured, the FD/AP goes into VGP on the FMA. Where the altitude is set is no longer a constraint, so it goes to missed approach altitude, except in one case. Collins FMS database has visual approaches for every, or nearly every, runway at airports in the database. In that one case, it's a LNAV/VNAV mode and the FD/AP will respect any altitude selection. Put 500' in and at 500', it levels off and you lose the vertical VMC path to 50' over the threshold. It's a visual, not instrument approach, just giving guidance. In a visual, you have to set RWY to have the path to the threshold.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 12:48 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero
And by "setting dirt" you mean 0? Honest question. Because why would you do that if you can just set 500' and at least have one last THIN layer of protection?

I don't understand why 0 would ever be selected. Ever.
Yea I don't understand the setting of 0' in the altitude window for any reason, for any approach. Can somebody explain why some operators do this?
PilotdadCJDCMD is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 01:05 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by PilotdadCJDCMD
Yea I don't understand the setting of 0' in the altitude window for any reason, for any approach. Can somebody explain why some operators do this?
I’ve never sat in a SWA Jumpseat but I’ve heard so many stories from those who have of unstable approaches. Almost every story was to “high and fast” sometimes well below 1000’. The mistake they’re making now is flying unstable approaches too low where ATC can “tell on them” by asking “WTF are you guys doing” over a recorded transmission after receiving an automated alt alert and Youtube does the rest.

Just don’t let the FAA get a hold of the taxi speed data. Does SWA even have a taxi speed limitation on the 73? Aircraft can’t lift off the ground?
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 04:22 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN
I’ve never sat in a SWA Jumpseat but I’ve heard so many stories from those who have of unstable approaches. Almost every story was to “high and fast” sometimes well below 1000’. The mistake they’re making now is flying unstable approaches too low where ATC can “tell on them” by asking “WTF are you guys doing” over a recorded transmission after receiving an automated alt alert and Youtube does the rest.

Just don’t let the FAA get a hold of the taxi speed data. Does SWA even have a taxi speed limitation on the 73? Aircraft can’t lift off the ground?
Who forgot to give this clown his meds?
JustInFacts is offline  
Old 07-25-2024, 05:53 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 750
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN
I’ve never sat in a SWA Jumpseat but I’ve heard so many stories from those who have of unstable approaches. Almost every story was to “high and fast” sometimes well below 1000’. The mistake they’re making now is flying unstable approaches too low where ATC can “tell on them” by asking “WTF are you guys doing” over a recorded transmission after receiving an automated alt alert and Youtube does the rest.

Just don’t let the FAA get a hold of the taxi speed data. Does SWA even have a taxi speed limitation on the 73? Aircraft can’t lift off the ground?
why don’t you worry about your current meltdown
Broncofan is offline  
Old 07-26-2024, 04:20 AM
  #19  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,584
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
This is Collins-specific and maybe type specific. In any approach with a vertical guidance (ILS, LPV, Baro VNAV) once the vertical guidance is captured, the FD/AP goes into VGP on the FMA. Where the altitude is set is no longer a constraint, so it goes to missed approach altitude, except in one case. Collins FMS database has visual approaches for every, or nearly every, runway at airports in the database. In that one case, it's a LNAV/VNAV mode and the FD/AP will respect any altitude selection. Put 500' in and at 500', it levels off and you lose the vertical VMC path to 50' over the threshold. It's a visual, not instrument approach, just giving guidance. In a visual, you have to set RWY to have the path to the threshold.
I'm not sure if 737 is the same but the Honeywell FMC in other Boeings has approach logic even for the VFR approaches loaded from the database. They are flown in LNAV/VNAV. So it will fly and guide the approach even when the altitude selected in the MCP is higher than current altitude, as long as you are past the generated "FAF".
So, you put 500ft in, and once you're past the "FAF", you can set your missed approach altitude and it will still keep flying the approach to the 50ft TCH, unless you select TOGA.
dera is offline  
Old 07-26-2024, 09:23 AM
  #20  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero
And by "setting dirt" you mean 0? Honest question. Because why would you do that if you can just set 500' and at least have one last THIN layer of protection?

I don't understand why 0 would ever be selected. Ever.
Because it's SOP, so the FD and possibly AP don't level off on short final and completely destabilize your approach.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CC268
American
63
06-07-2023 10:30 AM
NMuir
Major
0
10-14-2016 11:19 AM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
4
01-13-2016 11:01 PM
Pilotdave
Flight Schools and Training
5
07-21-2010 05:37 AM
KiloAlpha
Major
16
11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices