Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Lost Window

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2024, 07:30 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,160
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
There is almost no chance of that happening. The amount of time someone occupies that space is so small it doesn't matter. If someone is using the bathroom right as the cabin experiences an explosive decompression, thy could be injured if it happens right before they can open the bathroom door. If they manage to open the bathroom door, that door will take the majority of the impact. And then even if that happens, half the time their back will be facing the door causing their back to take the impact. Only 25% of the time of an already very small window will their face take the brunt of the impact. There are much bigger risks we take. If you are worried about that, why even bother have FAs walking around the cabin?; Everyone should be belted into their seats at all times.
Yeah the danger of a cockpit door projectile seems significantly smaller than the gaping hole in the side of the aircraft and the lack of O2.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 04:45 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Default

Originally Posted by Carebear
Go to your systems handbook for the 737 or A320 under general and look at the door schematic. If the entire door actually opened, there’s nothing in the systems handbook about that happening.
v

My A330 manual does say that all 3 door locks will be released in the event of a decompression.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 05:35 AM
  #153  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,033
Exclamation

While the decompression relief of cockpit doors is already in the media and social media in detail now, let's not discuss the door locking mechanisms here on APC.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 05:58 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 101
Default

rumor is all max 9s grounded indefinitely? this true?
6packSteamJedi is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 06:57 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 683
Default

Originally Posted by 6packSteamJedi
rumor is all max 9s grounded indefinitely? this true?
Until they are safe:

For the Safety of American Travelers the FAA Will Keep the Boeing 737-9 MAX Grounded Until Extensive Inspection and Maintenance is Conducted and Data from Inspections is Reviewed Federal Aviation Administration
GoodJet is online now  
Old 01-12-2024, 08:57 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,134
Default

until they are safe? Explain then please how this plug is different than the one on the 900?

If the bolts are there, it is safe. Check the bolts, return flight.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 01-12-2024, 09:08 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 683
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
until they are safe? Explain then please how this plug is different than the one on the 900?

If the bolts are there, it is safe. Check the bolts, return flight.
It's the same. The issue is that QC at Boeing has gone into the lav harder than the flight deck door on 704AL.
GoodJet is online now  
Old 01-12-2024, 11:50 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
until they are safe? Explain then please how this plug is different than the one on the 900?

If the bolts are there, it is safe. Check the bolts, return flight.
I get the impression there is perhaps a lot more being discovered behind the scenes and the issues found are going a lot deeper than a few bolts. Could be wrong but sure looks that way at the moment. I’d be kinda shocked if they are flying sooner than at least a couple more months at this stage.

Boeing and the airlines are no doubt wanting a quick resolution but I can’t see the feds taking any chances on this one with so much public interest.
PorkyMcFuzz is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 12:11 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,160
Default

Originally Posted by PorkyMcFuzz
I get the impression there is perhaps a lot more being discovered behind the scenes and the issues found are going a lot deeper than a few bolts. Could be wrong but sure looks that way at the moment. I’d be kinda shocked if they are flying sooner than at least a couple more months at this stage.

Boeing and the airlines are no doubt wanting a quick resolution but I can’t see the feds taking any chances on this one with so much public interest.
Hopefully not an fuselage engineering flaw.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 01-13-2024, 12:58 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Cessna 205
Posts: 252
Default

Originally Posted by PorkyMcFuzz
I get the impression there is perhaps a lot more being discovered behind the scenes and the issues found are going a lot deeper than a few bolts. Could be wrong but sure looks that way at the moment. I’d be kinda shocked if they are flying sooner than at least a couple more months at this stage.

Boeing and the airlines are no doubt wanting a quick resolution but I can’t see the feds taking any chances on this one with so much public interest.

That area encompassing the door is only so big and there is only so much to look at. Unless they are looking at other parts of the plane I don’t see this lasting months.
clearandcold is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hockeypilot44
Delta
3
05-15-2023 10:25 PM
MEFLIGHT
American
112
10-29-2020 12:41 PM
Excargodog
COVID19
75
10-27-2020 08:55 AM
Inop2
American
5
03-18-2018 10:05 AM
Inop2
Piedmont Airlines
2
03-18-2018 05:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices