Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines >

QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2023, 08:48 PM
  #211  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 169
Default

Originally Posted by PorkyMcFuzz
At my airline we got taught that a pull of the handle was something you could reset, a pull AND a twist and that was it for the engine.
I remember being taught the same, and yes this was for an E-JET type. However, during recurrent one year the systems instructor posed the question as to how we could disable the aircraft in order to prevent a hostile from starting up the engines and flying away with it. Naturally we all suggested blowing the bottles, but we were then informed that, while doing so would legally down the engine, they could still be physically started.
flydrive is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 11:17 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,915
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
What the h3ll does skin color have to do with anything?
…along with a discernible name? Preconceived notions and biases.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 11:26 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: 767
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by flydrive
I remember being taught the same, and yes this was for an E-JET type. However, during recurrent one year the systems instructor posed the question as to how we could disable the aircraft in order to prevent a hostile from starting up the engines and flying away with it. Naturally we all suggested blowing the bottles, but we were then informed that, while doing so would legally down the engine, they could still be physically started.
curious as to what his answer was…
PlaneS is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 12:25 AM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,161
Default

Originally Posted by noisecanceller
i don’t care what anyone advertises. Every six months it’s an exercise to earn back the right to earn our living. They don’t take it away. You go in with it gone at the end of the month and have to hope the guy with the pen lets you have that right back for another six months.

It’s no wonder people are less than forthcoming with information or forego many versions healthcare so it’s not on the record. The faa hunting through medical and pharmacy records hoping to find offenders isn’t helping. Now that everything is electronic i bet the level of healthcare avoidance has gone way up from when everything was held in a wall of paper files.

“oh, we’re here to help you get back to flying if you have an issue” is such bs. What they really mean is they take away your living and make you jump through a bunch of nonsensical hoops and paper pushing and observation periods while your case sits at the bottom of a massive stack of other cases. Meanwhile days, weeks, months, years tick by while you don’t get a paycheck and they are supposed to be the champions helping you get back in the cockpit. My ass. Anything but. Even the best ltd isn’t anywhere close to full income replacement. The faa needs to start picking up the difference between your last w2 and your ltd payout unless you’re a clear and present danger or let guys get the care they need mental of physical without the thought of losing their livelihood every six months or less.
preeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaach!

Guilty until proven innocent in the Aeromedical world. Interesting since you get paid leave during incidents and accident investigations in many cases.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 01:35 AM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 560
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
Unfortunately this is nothing new. Remember JAL flight 350? The (working) Captain pulled back all four engines mid-flight (and might have put them in reverse) on a DC-8 and killed 24 people by doing this.

Pilot mass suicides have occurred previously (Germanwings, Silk Air, possibly MH370 and the Chinese air carrier I cannot think of), so mental health is definitely an issue. Banning the JS wouldn't be a step in the right direction but we're talking about the FAA here whose previous administrator has grounded a DL pilot due to bogus mental health issues while he was something higher up like the director of Ops.
What does the previous administrator in the job he had previous to being administrator have to do with this incident? Not a good take on your part.
TegridyFarms is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 01:53 AM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4FunAA
On the bright side, Single pilot just got pushed back decades with this one.
That, or pilotless airplanes just got pushed forward decades.
ObadiahDogberry is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 02:02 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
And it changed right back a couple years later, guess the FA's couldn't be bothered. Business as usual.
Was flying for a European carrier last summer and it was required by the CAA to have an FA in the flight deck when a pilot took a trip to the lavatory.
ObadiahDogberry is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 03:10 AM
  #218  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,261
Default

Originally Posted by PlaneS
curious as to what his answer was…
One that should not be discussed here.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 03:25 AM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

I've been hearing a rumor that not everything is as it seems with this incident. Anyone else hearing it?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 10-24-2023, 04:08 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sourdough44's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Left
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I've been hearing a rumor that not everything is as it seems with this incident. Anyone else hearing it?

I’ve got a few of the same indicators. He’s still in heap-big-trouble. It ‘may not’ of been as serious of an event as first portrayed.


Just early scuttlebutt.
sourdough44 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Engineers & Technicians
162
10-18-2014 02:29 PM
ranger3484
Major
89
11-03-2013 07:14 PM
Bucking Bar
Major
97
03-21-2011 03:03 PM
AirbusA320
Corporate
120
10-08-2010 03:40 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
4
12-31-2005 07:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices