Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines >

QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines

Search

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

QX2059 Jumpseater tries to shutdown engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2023, 05:17 PM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 367
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4FunAA
On the bright side, Single pilot just got pushed back decades with this one.
I’m good with that
Cleared4appch is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:27 PM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 649
Default

Originally Posted by PipeMan
Correct. I prefer to drive instead of spending hours on an airplane each month going to and from. But to each their own. How’s all the positive space commuting working out? Oh wait…
what’s so scary about jump-seating?.
There are a lot of pilots at my airline who are very reluctant to JS…probably the types who Mother tucked them into bed each night…it’s not rocket science or overly stressful to JS.
Vito is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:39 PM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
nothing to do with KCM… but IMO the FAA should look at JS access as it is a risk…
No.

How can you fail such a simple logical test?

This was an ATP holding mainline Captain. He has access to his own cockpit.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:40 PM
  #184  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by paulcg77
The only fact I'm aware of is that he pulled both fire handles and the crew was able to save both engines. The airline has stated this (referring to the "handles", plural), and I re-posted it an hour or two ago in this thread. Additionally, you could say it's "fact" that the crew thought he had intent, stating to ATC "We’ve got the guy that tried to shut the engines down out of the cockpit".
The fire handles on the E170 have to be pulled pretty hard to snap into the position that cuts off the fuel (along with hydraulics and bleed air I think). I wonder if he just didn’t pull hard enough
jrydel is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:40 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Originally Posted by PipeMan
IMHO, cockpit JS should only be allowed for traveling to/from an assignment, and only on the pilot’s own metal. No cockpit JS for leisure travel, only cabin.

On other airlines, leisure or to work but cabin only.

This event was bound to happen, not a matter of it, but when.
Your paranoia is staggering.

Thankfully, most people reject it.


.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:49 PM
  #186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 434
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
And that short sighted mentality will do absolutely nothing to resolve future events like this. It has absolutely nothing to do with compassion. Regardless of him being locked up or not, he will never have a chance to get back to 121 flying. But locking him up will send a very clear message to anybody struggling with mental health issues: don't try to get help. Obviously it's wrong to try to kill 60+ people. But he was willing to die to make that happen, so I doubt that similarly inclined individuals would be deterred by the threat of punishment. It's not about if he deserves help, it's about the fact that not giving him help will lead to more, not less events like this.
Read about the German wings case. Did that pilot belong in the cockpit? No, but him knowing he would lose his job if he sought help is what pulled the trigger.
So you’re suggesting get him help with zero punishment or consequences? If I follow your logic, jail time for this offense would deter others from getting help. Sooooo, help but no jail time. Maybe he will offer a sincere apology, and get help. That’s a great deterrent. Brilliant.
CoefficientX is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 05:53 PM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,153
Default

Originally Posted by PipeMan
I’m going to be the first person to say this, but maybe he is a Muslim extremist? We’d have to wait for the report to see if he was shouting alluh akbar or whatever it is they say.

While a mental breakdown is possible, I would not be so quick to rule out terrorism by an extremist who just happens to be white.

First you think Jumpseats should be restricted, now you are blaming terrorists?

You are way out there….
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 06:00 PM
  #188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,915
Default

Originally Posted by 11atsomto
Considering his name is published and it is obviously not a Muslim name.….I Dont think it’s very likely…..but your are on to something as if it were you bet your ascot the narrative would be terrorism. Since it’s not….the narrative will be Mental Health.
So white = mental health breakdown and brown = extremist/terrorist. I guess that's honest at least.

Originally Posted by rickair7777
He's not that, I can assure you.

You don't have to be Arab or Muslim to sympathize with Hamas, et al, but even that seems far fetched.
Unfortunately in this country we still perpetuate the brown Muslim boogeyman while the real threats (insurrectionists, mass shooters, anti-election, anti-government, anti-vaccine, etc.) have been, well, not people that look brown...
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 06:08 PM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
paulcg77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A shack in Kailua
Posts: 298
Default

Originally Posted by jrydel
The fire handles on the E170 have to be pulled pretty hard to snap into the position that cuts off the fuel (along with hydraulics and bleed air I think). I wonder if he just didn’t pull hard enough
That would make a lot more sense than some of the alternative explanations. I don’t know the first thing about the jungle jet so thanks for saying that. From what I’ve read, the jump seater was typed on the CRJ and Dash, so probably had no experience with embraer procedures.
paulcg77 is offline  
Old 10-23-2023, 06:22 PM
  #190  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,114
Default

Originally Posted by PipeMan
IMHO, cockpit JS should only be allowed for traveling to/from an assignment, and only on the pilot’s own metal. No cockpit JS for leisure travel, only cabin.

On other airlines, leisure or to work but cabin only.

This event was bound to happen, not a matter of it, but when.
I recently read an article that said by the time all the Starlink satellites are in low earth orbit it has been calculated that satellite recently debris will then kill 0.61 people per year and the author was recommending they be banned. 0.61 deaths per 8 billion people per year doesn’t much scare me. Especially since the US alone is losing 100k people a year to fentanyl overdoses.

This single event is not - IMHO - sufficient justification to change one damn thing.
Excargodog is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Engineers & Technicians
162
10-18-2014 02:29 PM
ranger3484
Major
89
11-03-2013 07:14 PM
Bucking Bar
Major
97
03-21-2011 03:03 PM
AirbusA320
Corporate
120
10-08-2010 03:40 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
4
12-31-2005 07:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices