Republic Airlines
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 511
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The one comment I don't get is about the maintenance. As a former mechanic and after working at another regional, I would say that it is really good. One average, RAH carries a lot less MEL's than most other regionals. Hell, I get a lot of them with zero.
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#12
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually, in the US regional industry, its a great idea. ![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
#13
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually, in the US regional industry, its a great idea. ![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
#14
Banned
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,071
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually, in the US regional industry, its a great idea. ![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
![EEK!](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/eek.gif)
If you're starting out, go to a carrier that's fleet is well positioned for the future because you're going to be there for a while, so you want the company to be too. Or take advantage of the ignorance of the SJS syndrome crowd and go to a carrier that has undesirable aircraft (in the eyes of a SJS pilot) where you don't need to care much about their long-term prospects - you're not going to be there long-term either, since you'll likely move on before most guys with your DOH at other carriers even upgrade!
401K, scheduling, and pay scales are priorities only if you intend to stay there long term. Think of it this way - would you trade 3 years in a turboprop @ $40/hr with poor QOL and a small 401K for 3 years in a 787 @ $200+/hr, and large 401K, and great QOL when you're older, or would you give up 5 years in the 787 for 5 years of flying an RJ around with ok QOL and some 401K @ $80/hr?
So, yeah, you most certainly are considering your 401K, scheduling, and pay scales over your career when you choose what employer you will work for based on the aircraft you will fly.
Also, like said in earlier posts. I'd much rather spend time with my family and watch my kids grow as opposed to sitting reserve for a major gone 5-6days a week for 5+ yrs. I can do that once the kiddies are grown and gone.
In fact no major is hiring in droves or plan to for the next 3-4yrs. That's a long time to sit at a lower scale regional. Just my .02
#15
#17
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: None
Posts: 87
#18
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A "great contract"? Compare your contract to the mainline carrier your carrier supports. Would you trade their contract for yours? If so, yours isn't "great".
I have a lot of friends that went to colgan and commutair . . . they'll get to a major a few years before me, but I wouldnt trade this time with my family for anything.
So, you get to spend time with your family from 2012-2015. Your kids and wife get to see their dad maybe 20% more, and on more desirable days (birthday, holidays, etc). Then you'll be a junior FO at mainline. Even though you only started 3 years later, since no majors were hiring from 2008-2013, you gave up 6 years of Delta pay ($540,000, minimum guarantee on reserve as a DC-9B, a Republic FO earned $193,500 as a min guarantee, a difference of $346,500) for that extra 3 years with your family too. The Delta guy will have choices in 2023 that are not available to you (737 CA, great QOL or 787 CA, ok QOL with more $), and might never be in your entire career at Delta. If he invested that $346,500 at 5% interest today, he also has an additional $1.17M in 2038 for retirement (worth $578K in today's $ when we adjust for inflation). He might be able to retire early, spending every holiday and weekend with his family for those years. He can possibly not have to worry about how to pay for his kids to go to college, and maybe his grandkids too.
Like you said, you wouldn't trade this time with family for anything (over $1M and lower QOL from 2015-career end). I respect that, and it may be a good choice for you. but there are consequences, and they will last your entire life. Though you may know them and feel it is worth it, perhaps not all do.
![Confused](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Not a stretch at all. Everyone will hold the 737 at United. Spending 3 extra years at a regional as a Captain may mean you may never have the seniority to hold the left seat of a 787 . . . ever (so, spending 3 years as a RJ CA means you never get 5 years as a 787 CA, and that's being very generous to your point). Ask an American, United, or US Airways guy hired in 2000 what his career prospects are. If he's at US Airways, he's still a NB FO, was furloughed for years, will get placed behind much younger guys hired almost a decade after him if/when US Airways and America West merge, and won't upgrade for another 10 years. At United or American - he's furloughed today. Seriously.
In fact no major is hiring in droves or plan to for the next 3-4yrs.
Either miss some time with your family now, or miss more time with your family later. Those are your likely choices. Both of them are painful. Good luck.
This is more for people who are choosing Republic now, not for those who are already invested in it - you made your bed already, and it may have been a great choice for you, but its far from the obvious and best choice for the average RAH pilot.
Sorry for the length and thread drift. This being the regionals forum, feel free to have the last word if you choose.
#20
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Training is not that bad..as organized as any other regional. It's done at Flight Safety.
Pay is low for FO's.
Morale is not that great..it is what you make it.
Voted to strike but but don't see being released by the mediator anytime soon.
Probably don't have to worry about furloughs unless a certificate just goes under..if any it would be CHQ. ..but don't see that happening really.
Maintenance is fine. When something breaks they fix it or MEL it, just as anywhere else..if you want to see poorly maintained aircraft try part 135 freight.
If you live in one of the bases you won't have a bad quality of life..though early show times for the outstation bases will bring that down. You might get lucky and get the base you want and you might not..same with the certificate.
Not agreeing to disagree..Everyone has their opinions of the place. Skywest/Expressjet certainly better in my opinion of a better run company, pilot pay, and bases. But after that it's all the same really.
No matter where you go the whining doesn't stop when you shut down the engines.
Pay is low for FO's.
Morale is not that great..it is what you make it.
Voted to strike but but don't see being released by the mediator anytime soon.
Probably don't have to worry about furloughs unless a certificate just goes under..if any it would be CHQ. ..but don't see that happening really.
Maintenance is fine. When something breaks they fix it or MEL it, just as anywhere else..if you want to see poorly maintained aircraft try part 135 freight.
If you live in one of the bases you won't have a bad quality of life..though early show times for the outstation bases will bring that down. You might get lucky and get the base you want and you might not..same with the certificate.
Not agreeing to disagree..Everyone has their opinions of the place. Skywest/Expressjet certainly better in my opinion of a better run company, pilot pay, and bases. But after that it's all the same really.
No matter where you go the whining doesn't stop when you shut down the engines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post