Republic and AA in talks on large RJ contract
#71
That said, it certainly isn't everyone. They have some great people over there too. I guess the angry-nasties just tend to stand out, and seem to be increasing lately. It's too bad, I really used to love F9 when I was entering the industry.
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
IBT we stand! One list(JOKE), One voice(Joke), One contract(Joke)!
How do I sign up for Purdue U and be cool like you!
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
I am a proud pilot, with my RAH pilot hat and chest held up high, with business cards that say "I am a cool Pilot."
Is this hearsay that your pilots are being treated badly by F9 pilots? Every pilot is welcome on my aircraft without ANY political BS!
#75
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
#76
Easy there Yoda. Has it all figured out, you do. Argue with substance, you do not.
I didn't buy F9. I didn't propose a seniority list integration nor rule on one. I didn't make a back-room deal, nor sue you for it. I got hosed in the integration but am intelligent enough to not be angry towards those senior to me, even if I think they shouldn't be.
Fast forward to relevance to the OP...If we experience growth due to some deal with AA, I didn't make it. I don't want it even if it means an upgrade...I want the jobs to stay at mainline. If AA thinks the 190 or 170/175 is good airplane for their business, then buy them and hire our pilots, SkyWest pilots, A. Eagle pilots etc. etc. to fly them at appropriate rates.
To blame me, as you Bolo and theaviator does, has so many logical fallacies it is scary you don't see it.
Of course those who wish to be angry will always find ways to justify it, and outlets to which to display it.
Entitlement is incorrect Bolo, I came here to "pay my dues" like all you F9 guys say you did. The proud chest-puffed, IBT-chanting picture you paint speaks to how very little you know of our pilot group.
I didn't buy F9. I didn't propose a seniority list integration nor rule on one. I didn't make a back-room deal, nor sue you for it. I got hosed in the integration but am intelligent enough to not be angry towards those senior to me, even if I think they shouldn't be.
Fast forward to relevance to the OP...If we experience growth due to some deal with AA, I didn't make it. I don't want it even if it means an upgrade...I want the jobs to stay at mainline. If AA thinks the 190 or 170/175 is good airplane for their business, then buy them and hire our pilots, SkyWest pilots, A. Eagle pilots etc. etc. to fly them at appropriate rates.
To blame me, as you Bolo and theaviator does, has so many logical fallacies it is scary you don't see it.
Of course those who wish to be angry will always find ways to justify it, and outlets to which to display it.
Entitlement is incorrect Bolo, I came here to "pay my dues" like all you F9 guys say you did. The proud chest-puffed, IBT-chanting picture you paint speaks to how very little you know of our pilot group.
#77
Not hearsay Bolo, I was speaking of personal experiences I've had. If what you say is true, good on ya! Unfortunately, some of your angry brothers behave a little differently. And I agree...political BS should be left at home. It has no place in the cockpit, jet bridge, crew room etc.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Bottom line here, you got the Q-400 operation and next will most likely be the AE pilot group.
So zing that SEA Rider!