Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Republic Airways
Any good info or news of republic airways >

Any good info or news of republic airways

Search

Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

Any good info or news of republic airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2012, 10:23 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by LoitaHills

Simply and logically put, I understand your malcontent with the IBT, but in your posts, you don't offer a better alternative or submit any ideas of what you as a pilot would want while employed at RAH. You simply critique and complain on a public website seeming to want to win the approval a a few admitted APC troglodytes.

So, now is your opportunity. Do something about it.
The more I read from 36.62, the more I'm convinced he is an employee of Ford & Harrison, or the Seabury Group.
Oskeewowow is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 01:06 PM
  #32  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
Obviously you haven't watched Martin Bashir or Ed Schultz on PMSNBNC. Or watched Mika Brzezinski text her gal pal Valerie Jarrett during a broadcast. Not to mention Al Sharpton.

Fox may be biased, but they haven't sold their soul like MSNBC has. Its getting pathetic over there. It's actually gotten worse since Olbermann left. Probably explains why they are tanking in the ratings.

Forgot to mention.....IN BEFORE THE LOCK
Yup. They're all worthless. Waste of air time.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 02:25 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
Obviously you haven't watched Martin Bashir or Ed Schultz on PMSNBNC. Or watched Mika Brzezinski text her gal pal Valerie Jarrett during a broadcast. Not to mention Al Sharpton.

Fox may be biased, but they haven't sold their soul like MSNBC has. Its getting pathetic over there. It's actually gotten worse since Olbermann left. Probably explains why they are tanking in the ratings.

Forgot to mention.....IN BEFORE THE LOCK
Ed schultz: isn't he the same guy that played pizza the hut in "spaceballs"? I mean at least TRY to use the treadmill.
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 10:33 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STR8NLVL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23
Now there is no doubt in my mind you are not an RAH pilot. You probably work for RAH, but not out on the line. Not a single pilot would promote a website full of misinformation like that. Im not the biggest IBT advocate, but that website is so blatantly full of half truths and propoganda, there isn't a line pilot anywhere who would buy into it. It was put together by a company that specializes in union busting. You and all your other screen names on here need to stop pretending to be an RAH pilot.
You’re argument isn’t logical.

If the companies website is as off as you say, than it shows a pilot thinking about working at here what they’re facing.

The reason I posted the site it is because I and many others that don’t have 600 to 1100 posts on the message board, think the ExCo and the Neg Comm is leading our pilots down a path of unreasonable expectations.

The ExCo and NC want Air Canada, US Airways and JetBlue to be our “peer” group. They aren’t.


That’s not going to happen. We’re a regional. We get our business from other airlines. The companies site shows who they think our “peer” group is and many of our pilots agree even if they don’t tell everyone they talk to.

You wonder why I and others don’t post that on our message board? We’d be flamed in and out of the cockpit and in our lifes.

RAH will never pay what the NC is asking for. If they do we will either go out of business or be in bankruptcy in a week and lose what ever we got in court.

I think the ExCo is just setting us up to be dissapointed and angry with what we get or they just want to strike because they’re so mad at BB and WH that they will punish the pilots that they’re supposed to support just to get even in they’re mind.

This isn’t a good way to go about our negotiations.
The dumbest post I've ever read. So you think we should use 50 seat rates as our peer group for a predominantly 70 seat fleet?!

How about the FACT that the rates the company published as being what the union is asking for aren't even the rates that are currently proposed and haven't been for over six months?!

I guess you'd be happy with the lowest FO rates in the industry for a 70 seat plane and no raises for captains?

Idiotic. No way you're an RAH pilot! If you are, you're one of the 17 out of 2,000 that voted against a strike. Don't act like you speak for anyone but your own ignorant self.
STR8NLVL is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 04:51 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MusicPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Driving a Bus for Recreational Pleasure.
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by 3662forlife
You’re argument isn’t logical.

If the companies website is as off as you say, than it shows a pilot thinking about working at here what they’re facing.

The reason I posted the site it is because I and many others that don’t have 600 to 1100 posts on the message board, think the ExCo and the Neg Comm is leading our pilots down a path of unreasonable expectations.

The ExCo and NC want Air Canada, US Airways and JetBlue to be our “peer” group. They aren’t.


That’s not going to happen. We’re a regional. We get our business from other airlines. The companies site shows who they think our “peer” group is and many of our pilots agree even if they don’t tell everyone they talk to.

You wonder why I and others don’t post that on our message board? We’d be flamed in and out of the cockpit and in our lifes.

RAH will never pay what the NC is asking for. If they do we will either go out of business or be in bankruptcy in a week and lose what ever we got in court.

I think the ExCo is just setting us up to be dissapointed and angry with what we get or they just want to strike because they’re so mad at BB and WH that they will punish the pilots that they’re supposed to support just to get even in they’re mind.

This isn’t a good way to go about our negotiations.
Last time I checked pilot's payroll never bankrupt a company. BB said he wants bigger airplanes. He wants to fly code shares etc. Because the planes are labeled Regional doesn't mean that's what pay rate should be paid or determine what peer group you fall under. A labor group should always aim high when negotiating a contract. How much did it cost you to get your wings? Or should I say how much did it cost mom and dad? We're professionals, well at least most of us are, that deserve to be paid what we're worth and for the responsibility we carry when we're working.

By the way, I don't think I've met any pilot, scared or not, that's ever thought that a pilot group should only be paid what their peer groups getting paid. I've been around the business for a while too.

Seems like a management post to me.
MusicPilot is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 05:20 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Red97Vette's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: UniCal 737 FO
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by MusicPilot
Last time I checked pilot's payroll never bankrupt a company. BB said he wants bigger airplanes. He wants to fly code shares etc. Because the planes are labeled Regional doesn't mean that's what pay rate should be paid or determine what peer group you fall under. A labor group should always aim high when negotiating a contract. How much did it cost you to get your wings? Or should I say how much did it cost mom and dad? We're professionals, well at least most of us are, that deserve to be paid what we're worth and for the responsibility we carry when we're working.

By the way, I don't think I've met any pilot, scared or not, that's ever thought that a pilot group should only be paid what their peer groups getting paid. I've been around the business for a while too.

Seems like a management post to me.
Just make sure you dont get paid too much. Otherwise mainline just takes the flying back. You get expensive, you just priced yourself out of a job, and yes "regional" = LOWER pay than mainline. Thats why your job EXISTS. If you want high paid wages, blah blah blah then go to mainline. Oh you can't? Then suck it up til you get there, thats what most of us are doing. And yes, crew pay is about the highest expense a regional airline has.
Red97Vette is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 05:37 AM
  #37  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
Just make sure you dont get paid too much. Otherwise mainline just takes the flying back. You get expensive, you just priced yourself out of a job, and yes "regional" = LOWER pay than mainline. Thats why your job EXISTS. If you want high paid wages, blah blah blah then go to mainline. Oh you can't? Then suck it up til you get there, thats what most of us are doing. And yes, crew pay is about the highest expense a regional airline has.
You are stating that a Pilot group should "suck it up" work for crap wages just to maintain a business model that is designed to drive pilot compensation lower! As far as the crew pay being the largest escpense, we are in the business to fly passengers from point A to point B! The tools utilized for this task are multi million dollar aircraft operated in a hostile environment (traffic, weather etc...). These aircraft are operated by personally who whols a skil that requires years if experience to obtain as well as thousands of dollars. We as pilots are allowing the airlines to blame us pilots when tools are inadequate and that the bussiness can't support to pay us wages comparable with our skills. You sir don't sound like a pilot or managment, you don't sound like someone who understand economics, supply and demand or the aviation bussiness! At the current state of the industry leverage and law fall on managment's side of the scale! If Dal passes the TA cards will continue to slide in that direction

Last edited by What; 06-17-2012 at 05:59 AM.
What is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 07:04 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by What
You are stating that a Pilot group should "suck it up" work for crap wages just to maintain a business model that is designed to drive pilot compensation lower! As far as the crew pay being the largest escpense, we are in the business to fly passengers from point A to point B! The tools utilized for this task are multi million dollar aircraft operated in a hostile environment (traffic, weather etc...). These aircraft are operated by personally who whols a skil that requires years if experience to obtain as well as thousands of dollars. We as pilots are allowing the airlines to blame us pilots when tools are inadequate and that the bussiness can't support to pay us wages comparable with our skills. You sir don't sound like a pilot or managment, you don't sound like someone who understand economics, supply and demand or the aviation bussiness! At the current state of the industry leverage and law fall on managment's side of the scale! If Dal passes the TA cards will continue to slide in that direction
Supply and demand means even though you honed a skill through years of experience and thousands of dollars, you get paid what the market demands, not pay based on the effort you put into your talents. "wages comparable with our skills" is already being determined by supply and demand.
slough is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 07:24 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Red97Vette's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: UniCal 737 FO
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by What
You are stating that a Pilot group should "suck it up" work for crap wages just to maintain a business model that is designed to drive pilot compensation lower! As far as the crew pay being the largest escpense, we are in the business to fly passengers from point A to point B! The tools utilized for this task are multi million dollar aircraft operated in a hostile environment (traffic, weather etc...). These aircraft are operated by personally who whols a skil that requires years if experience to obtain as well as thousands of dollars. We as pilots are allowing the airlines to blame us pilots when tools are inadequate and that the bussiness can't support to pay us wages comparable with our skills. You sir don't sound like a pilot or managment, you don't sound like someone who understand economics, supply and demand or the aviation bussiness! At the current state of the industry leverage and law fall on managment's side of the scale! If Dal passes the TA cards will continue to slide in that direction
One word (everyone here knows it well): Whipsaw
As long as the "G7's" of the industry pop up you will never make significantly more than the wages than you are now (unless there is a major shake up, or the "pilot shortage" actually materializes). Every 5 - 10 years some carrier hits the "reset" button and screws everyone. Today, its G7, you get expensive "your" flying goes to them or someone comparable. IE they have no one with seniority and pay crap wages and can operate cheaper than anyone. Yet we can't complain, because there are always the APC'ers that start screaming about how are are all just outsourced flying and we are all our own worst enemies. I disagree, yes we are outsourced, because mainline decrees that it shall be, however, when another regional knows that they can just reset everything and screw everyone (other than mainline and their own management) thats something we should not stand for. If ALPA or any union had any balls we would prevent the whipsaw and stand up for decent wages, etc. (dare i say, a "Regional Union" that everyone participates in and prevents the whipsaw. But there are probably too many unforeseen consequences to that...)
Until that happens, I hope you get your 50% deserved pay raise (we all deserve it with the $$ of education, lifestyle, responsibilities, etc) but dont cry too hard when G7 or whoever undercuts the hell out of you or mainline just decides to take the flying back. Mainline doesn't give a s h i t about your $$ education, life, health, or anything. Their bean counters care only about $$$. Then again, I must not understand anything about economics or the industry...
Red97Vette is offline  
Old 06-17-2012, 07:33 AM
  #40  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by slough
Supply and demand means even though you honed a skill through years of experience and thousands of dollars, you get paid what the market demands, not pay based on the effort you put into your talents. "wages comparable with our skills" is already being determined by supply and demand.
Exacly, as long as there is a supply of pilots mainlines will be able to whipsaw the regionals but as this demand increases regionals will have to adapt, you are seeing it with RAH giving the 5000 bonus and it will just continue. 50 seaters will be parked but not fast enought to offset attrition.
What is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
FlyitB
Republic Airways
284
08-04-2012 04:32 PM
JohnnyCochran
Regional
4
09-13-2007 05:57 AM
Freight Dog
Regional
13
03-08-2007 03:42 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices