Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Republic Airways (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/republic-airways/)
-   -   Republic Airways to Fly Q400's for UAX (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/republic-airways/67379-republic-airways-fly-q400s-uax.html)

MunkyButtr 05-26-2012 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by AxialFlow (Post 1197886)
Even then, it's dicey at best. Many thought 9E/9L/XJ was the THEE place to be after our contract was ratified. Bottom line: RAH's business model doesn't leave much room for improving pilot QOL. This idea (at the regional level) that one pilot group is going to jack up their end of the house and other's will follow suit is naive. It doesn't mesh with the regional business model and it's why places like Eagle are in the cross-hairs of management.

I think the failure of 9E will have a negative effect on regional negotiations. I wish RAH the best of luck, but I see BB using the "look what happened to pinnacle" line quite a bit. Our contract wasn't even ground breaking and the company is crying. Sounds like yhe execs at rah went to the same school as 9e's.... best of luck.

ColdWhiskey 05-26-2012 09:12 AM


Originally Posted by flyguy23 (Post 1197865)
No we do not have rates. Former lynx pilots have been flying them under former lynx rates. That has been grieved and will be heard in july. That fight began before this new Q announcement. The company refused to negotiate due to all the Qs being scheduled to go away. Now negotiations have opened. I love how pilots feel the need to try and trash another pilot group. Its really pathetic. Id somewhat understand if rah just signed a new contract with pituful rates, but thats simply not the case. We've had a strike vote and are in federal mediation to try and achieve an industry leading contract. You can yell and scream about how slow its going and how ineffective negotiations have been, but its the process unfortunately. Cant escape the rla.

I think you meant to say, "Can't escape the ineptitude of the IBT."

Kaptain 05-26-2012 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by BLEEDBLACKNGOLD (Post 1197854)
Do you even know why the pay rates @RAH are low? The union spent all of it's resources in order to gain 1 master seniority list on the last contract (Republic was originally going to be a Trans States/ Go Jets deal). Chautauqua was the only airline. Shuttle America a separate regional flying Saabs. There wasn't even a hint of larger RJs coming on property because CHQ was scoped to 50 seats or less (AMR). It's a shame that the RAH pilots are still trying to negotiate a contract that expired 6 years ago.

Not true. Bedford stepped in the last week of negotiations because he needed a contract in place to secure financing and deals for E170/175's ....he finished up the pay scales to the 78 seat point and at then in a surprise move, just in case, thru in scales for the 79-99 seat. (Actually an earlier TA with higher pay scales was voted down). At the time (2003) it was a industry leading contract and upgrades were two years and no one though there would be such stagnation in the industry. There is no excuse for not having a new contract by now!

Paid2fly 05-26-2012 09:05 PM


Originally Posted by Kaptain (Post 1198423)
Not true. Bedford stepped in the last week of negotiations because he needed a contract in place to secure financing and deals for E170/175's ....he finished up the pay scales to the 78 seat point and at then in a surprise move, just in case, thru in scales for the 79-99 seat. (Actually an earlier TA with higher pay scales was voted down). At the time (2003) it was a industry leading contract and upgrades were two years and no one though there would be such stagnation in the industry. There is no excuse for not having a new contract by now!







"Industry leading contract:confused::eek:"??? That's funny!

BoilerUP 05-27-2012 02:32 AM


Originally Posted by Kaptain
At the time (2003) it was a industry leading contract

AWAC had a concessionary contract go into effect the same date as CHQ (1 Oct 2003), and 50 seat CA payrates and no JM aside, I'm not certain anything in the CHQ 2003 contract was "leading".

newarkblows 05-27-2012 03:06 AM

Mesa's union also believed their contract was "industry leading." A little knowledge into other airlines contracts goes a long way. Every regional has a long way to go for an "industry leading" contract.

TillerEnvy 05-27-2012 08:11 AM

Well isn't this cute. A bunch of regional pilots arguing who has the better contract...priceless.

Even if you win the special Olympics...

ShyGuy 05-27-2012 09:34 AM


Originally Posted by TillerEnvy (Post 1198671)
Well isn't this cute. A bunch of regional pilots arguing who has the better contract...priceless.

Even if you win the special Olympics...

Seriously. This thread has gotten out of hand. One regional group arguing the other group is "taking their flying" and "doing it cheaper."

DLAJ77 05-27-2012 09:53 AM


Originally Posted by TillerEnvy (Post 1198671)
Well isn't this cute. A bunch of regional pilots arguing who has the better contract...priceless.

Even if you win the special Olympics...

Denial. an unconscious defense mechanism characterized by refusal to acknowledge painful realities, thoughts, or feelings... Its ok tiller its natural. There are differences and we hope that the republic pilot group gets what they deserve. Your management group has made enough money off the backs of its pilots.

3662forlife 05-27-2012 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by Kaptain (Post 1198423)

At the time (2003) it was a industry leading contract and upgrades were two years and no one though there would be such stagnation in the industry. There is no excuse for not having a new contract by now!


Originally Posted by Paid2fly (Post 1198504)

"Industry leading contract:confused::eek:"??? That's funny!

That IS funny!!!!!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands