Search

Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

Republic update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2012, 08:14 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by Mulva
Funny thing is, looking at the list of individuals present at that meeting (in person or by calling in), I see ALPA, USAPA, SWAPA and even FAPA represented, but no reference to the Teamsters. Is this program (something that will positively impact each and ever IBT Airline Division member) not important enough for at least someone to call in?
Mulva - you need to understand that the airline division of IBT is a very small, perhaps even insignificant (in IBT National's eyes) part of the organization. It probably wouldn't have hurt if the RAH pilots had realized that about 2 years ago.
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 09:01 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeaRider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: El Capitan de Airbii
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
Mulva - you need to understand that the airline division of IBT is a very small, perhaps even insignificant (in IBT National's eyes) part of the organization. It probably wouldn't have hurt if the RAH pilots had realized that about 2 years ago.
So what if we had?

Mulva, what exactly is your point? It seems both sides may be playing games with lawsuits. Is your point that the IBT sucks? Great, for argument's sake, we'll say you are right...case closed. So, what is the point?

I keep going back to this topic because I know it relates, however I feel like i'm beating a dead horse. IBT was the clear lesser of evils at the time of the card drive for union representation. FAPA made it clear thier disdain for all things RAH particularly our pilot group. FAPA wanted nothing to do with us. RPC was (or at least appeared) a reincarnation of FAPA, and was silent during the card drive period.

That left IBT. IBT has screwed us royally in the past (which I hope my brothers and sisters don't forget), but we had a brand-new local, and a new EXCO comprised of trusted members of our pilot group.

I still attest to this day: In the months leading up to and including the card drive period, FAPA had 1st and goal at the 10yd line, and threw a pick-6 to IBT.

Like someone mentioned, this is our careers. So, who would elect union representation from an entity(ies) that has no interest in the well-being of our pilot group?

That being said, I would submit that there is too much blind faith over here for the IBT. To me, this mirrors religion. A group of people afraid an unknown/lack of afterlife turn to blind faith and the promise of eternal life and heaven. Naysayers are subject to mob mentality, and are cursed as the devil and burned at the stake. (hey, how's it going 3662forlife?) Some on the local357 board are so quick to jump on anyone who even questions what is going on. Blind faith and mob mentality all the way!

This pilot group is so fed-up with abusive work rules, despicable pay, contract violations, and an incompetent managment group that blames the pilots for thier shortcomings and is determined to beat them into submission. The IBT is viewed by many as the savior. Right or wrong, that's all we have.

I know that personally, I need to make more than 33K next year, and would like to spend more than 8 days/mo. at home. If this doesn't change, I don't think I'll make it.

So tell me, F9wisebros, what exactly to you think us RAHbros over here oughta do?

-SR
SeaRider is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 10:48 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by SeaRider
Mulva, what exactly is your point?
My point is that IBT357 appears to be more of the same old $hi+ for you guys. FAPA, RPC, ALPA aside, that is all in the past. No longer pertinent to the discussion. That game is over. Present and future is all that matters at this point. Like you said, IBT was the lesser of the evils and it may have been the best worst choice you had. I get it. Just make sure they are truly working for you with your best interests in mind. I've been pointing out for the last 6 weeks that IBT357 (and National) are master manipulators and misrepresent/spin information in a masterful way. Don't let them.

Blind faith and mob mentality all the way!
You said it! Too many of your guys appear to blindly follow along, but I am encouraged that more recently, some are starting to question the Teamsters tactics and communications. For better or worse, you are all stuck with the Teamsters for now. You're committed so you might as well make sure they are doing the best possible job they can for YOU since YOU are covering the bill with YOUR DUES (and ours too!). I hear the 357 has an open book policy regarding their finances. All you need to do is stop by the office and check them out, right? Anyone ever try that? My understanding is that they are a little sensitive to having "members" view such material. This is your money fellas so make sure they are spending it wisely.

The only thing the Teamsters appear to do well is screw people, often including their own members. Draw the line!


Originally Posted by SeaRider
So tell me, F9wisebros, what exactly to you think us RAHbros over here oughta do?
Answer #1:

Keep your representatives honest. Ask them to communicate the truth to you in a timely manner, not 10 days later, after the message has been professionally massaged to meet their needs. Good news is good news, bad news is bad news, just make sure they are giving you the good and the bad, a.k.a "the truth."

The only thing that sucks more than lack of communication is being communicated to in a way that often (and repeatedly) misrepresents the truth. That might be summed up as disingenuous and it is exactly the game your representatives are playing. Put them on the hot seat and keep them honest.

As for the Known Crewmember situation, IBT represents airline pilots as do the other organizations who attended the most recent meeting/conference call. The fact that IBT did not participate suggests to me that they either (1) chose not to attend or (2) were not aware of such meeting. In either case, this is a gross example of their failure as stewards of your best interests. Maybe one of your guys (3662?) can ask them to comment on the circumstances associated with their lack of participation. I'm pretty certain they wouldn't have passed on a meeting of similar significance related to pipe fitters, beer brewers or Twinkie makers. But then again, that is the their bread and butter, not Airline pilots.

Answer #2:

Quit and find a better job!

Last edited by Mulva; 04-20-2012 at 11:15 AM.
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:00 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by SeaRider
So tell me, F9wisebros, what exactly to you think us RAHbros over here oughta do?
You ought to run a card drive for a new election, and vote in ALPA or your own in-house union. Unfortunately, as full members of IBT, you're not allowed to do that.
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 11:21 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
You ought to run a card drive for a new election, and vote in ALPA or your own in-house union. Unfortunately, as full members of IBT, you're not allowed to do that.
CONSTITUTION of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

ART. XIX, SEC. 7
Grounds for Charges Against Members, Officers and Subordinate Bodies



Section 7 (b) (4)
Secession, or fostering the same.
Yup, I guess that rules that idea out. Once a Teamster always a Teamster.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...3VZkS_SBaFRT9Q
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 04:01 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Believe it or not RAHbros, this "troll" truly attempts to limit his content to factual information and personal opinion. That being said, I believe I owe you all an apology for spreading a little misinformation myself.

I knew it was too good to be true yesterday when I quoted all those statements from the "Judge." I was beside myself with joy as the quotes were appearing like manna from heaven. I absolutely did not recall reading them before in the 3/29 opinion, but was more than happy to assume I had just not paid enough attention. For good reason as I discovered when Ronaldo called me out and I went back and reviewed. Looks like I spaced out and didn't realize I was actually perusing the 8/3/11 court filing so, pretty much, all of those quotes came from attorneys arguing on behalf of Frontier pilots.

OOPS!

Makes me look like a bit of an idiot which I'm sure you already figured I was anyway. Made for good reading though, didn't it? Anyway, being a man of disingenuousity (or is it disingenuousesness?) I thought it best to fess up. That will teach me, eh? Thanks for bringing it to my attention Ronaldo.

The core of my argument still stands though: that IBT is a spin machine!
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:05 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeaRider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: El Capitan de Airbii
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by Mulva
Believe it or not RAHbros, this "troll" truly attempts to limit his content to factual information and personal opinion. That being said, I believe I owe you all an apology for spreading a little misinformation myself.

I knew it was too good to be true yesterday when I quoted all those statements from the "Judge." I was beside myself with joy as the quotes were appearing like manna from heaven. I absolutely did not recall reading them before in the 3/29 opinion, but was more than happy to assume I had just not paid enough attention. For good reason as I discovered when Ronaldo called me out and I went back and reviewed. Looks like I spaced out and didn't realize I was actually perusing the 8/3/11 court filing so, pretty much, all of those quotes came from attorneys arguing on behalf of Frontier pilots.

OOPS!

Makes me look like a bit of an idiot which I'm sure you already figured I was anyway. Made for good reading though, didn't it? Anyway, being a man of disingenuousity (or is it disingenuousesness?) I thought it best to fess up. That will teach me, eh? Thanks for bringing it to my attention Ronaldo.

The core of my argument still stands though: that IBT is a spin machine!
Thanks for owning up. Many on this board wouldn't.

Regarding your Answer #1 above: There seems to be more of that occuring everyday. But one can't go blindly AGAINST the E-board and IBT either. The question that can be asked at almost every step is: Is the IBT 'spinning' points and misbehaving, or are we succumbing to managment's union-busting-101 & divisiveness tactics? I'm not casting an argument for either, but it's rhetoric from both sides every week. We're left guessing what is really happening with this super-secret-squirrel-behind-closed-doors garbage.

Regarding your Answer #2: Amen to that. The question remains of how long are we stuck in this situation, and how are we going to make it better for those that work here in the future.

-SR
SeaRider is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:38 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 206
Default

I did not make post #37 and have asked a Mod to take it down. 3662 seems to be infiltrating several message boards and hijacking users at the same time.
F9 A319 is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:01 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MusicPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Driving a Bus for Recreational Pleasure.
Posts: 544
Default

Hmmm, Republic update = IBT v FAPA. Maybe someone should start that thread.
MusicPilot is offline  
Old 04-20-2012, 08:51 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by F9 A319
I don't know any Frontier pilot paying full union dues. I also don't personally know any Frontier pilot that is a member of 357.

Furthermore, I don't know of a time when FAPA or a Frontier pilot has asked for any money from 357. In what context are you referring to FAPA or a singular F9 pilot asking for 357 money?

Based on the LM-2's it seems FAPA is doing quite a bit better than 357 financially, we don't want or need your money. It would be nice if 357 stopped trying to take FAPA's money and released our 1,200 hours of Flight Pay Loss, if for no other reason than to save 357 money. It could really be a win-win situation.

There also seems to be a level of dissension growing in 357's ranks, if one were to listen (and be able to interpret 3662forLife's posts).
Good thing that point just totally flew by ya.

And I assure you that there is not "growing dissension" in the ranks. You keep holding on to that thought. Hope it keeps you warm at night.
inside0ut is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
SF340guy
Union Talk
92
06-12-2011 06:30 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
av8tordude
Regional
2
09-03-2008 05:30 PM
Frisky Pilot
Major
0
06-23-2005 02:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices