Search

Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

Republic update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2012, 05:54 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by MrBrosef
Why do you like working for an airline so much that strives itself on being an ultra low cost carrier?
It's hard to explain unless you have actually worked here. Starting with the interview and day one of Indoc, you knew you were working with a bunch of very cool people. I can't tell you how many times my friends at Delta and United have told me how lucky I am to work at a company where people are actually happy. It's a good place and we hope it stays that way.

As for ULCC, that term seems to be associated with Allegiant and Spirit, which are both profitable airlines. They are also airlines that passengers aren't real thrilled with, but they still fly em. ULCC as has recently been mentioned in relation to F9 really means nothing more than having a VERY competitive CASM (sub 6 cents I believe is the goal). The Company briefly addressed this in passing during the investors conference call when it was mentioned that the goal is to be a ULCC while maintaining a quality product and customer loyalty (paraphrased there).

Why do you have so much heart for an airline name that has been around the block 2 times now? Also the name has been merged with I don't know how many but I think since 1950 and including all the carriers at RAH it's around 15 or so different carriers
The first Frontier Airlines had a 40 year run before eventually getting kicked to the curb via acquisition by People Express and the Continental Airlines.

The current Frontier Airlines was essentially a start-up using the same name and involving certain executives of the first Frontier. So until BK 4 years ago and acquisition by RAH and merger with YX, this Frontier was never involved in BK, acquisition or merger. Somehow the airline managed to operate on its own for the better part of 14 years before things fell apart. Lots of growth and movement. I showed up 2 years before BK and I'm about 50% up the FO list. QOL has always been great, schedules (until recently) too. We don't make top dollar, but an FO can easily make $80K plus with 17 days off while CA's can do the same making $140Kish. And with very nice work rules and flexibility. Not too bad. It's been a great place to work and we all want to see it last. Maybe it won't , but we are certainly willing to see it through.

BTW, it's not very often that someone attacks the RAHbros because of the crappy contract or pay you guys have. None of that is your fault. We may point out that your Union hasn't returned much for your money and that you can't expect "JetBlue" rates on the 190 if you hope to keep your jobs (sounds like the CHQ guys might want to be concerned about actually seeing a pay cut on the 50 seaters). That CHQ bit is not flame bait, but a reality (listen to the conference call). Regionals are Regionals, some better the others. RAH has always had a reputation of being less the labor friendly. I was at SkyWest. I liked it there and left after 3.5 years for a place I liked better. I hope you all are eventually able to say the same thing.

So MrBrosef, I'm hoping your questions were asked in good faith because the answers I provided assumed so.

Last edited by Mulva; 04-28-2012 at 06:06 PM.
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:02 PM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
MrBrosef's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 145 FO
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by MrBrosef
Ok I get the 30 minute drive to work thing, but than again that argument is made by regional pilots also. Lots of senior regional pilots don't want to leave because the easy drive to work.
There's also the thing about making well into the 6 figures for working 3 days a week.

Originally Posted by MrBrosef
Did you guys get any say on that or did RAH just stick it on you?
If the fact that pilots don't choose which cities are domiciles is "sticking it to you", then they stuck it to us. Otherwise, we'd have about 30 domiciles with 1-5 pilots each.
Well I guess since its a new base not much you can do which sucks.

They tried doing that same thing to CHQ in new York. We have a LGA base and we do a crap tone of Delta flying out of JFK so they tried making "new York" base. Union got involved and didn't let the company do it.

So yeah I guess there is a difference. Also I thought there was something in your contract about opening bases?
MrBrosef is offline  
Old 04-28-2012, 06:46 PM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
MrBrosef's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 145 FO
Posts: 51
Default

So MrBrosef, I'm hoping your questions were asked in good faith because the answers I provided assumed so.
Yes they are being asked in good faith I am not looking for an argument or to stir the pot. Just an honest thought and wanted an honest answer which is what I got!

I messed this quote stuff up lol because I wanted to answer another of your statements

I don't see RAH getting a pay cut anytime in the near future. If they did give me a pay cut well...... I can't talk about it in public or else someone will try and sue me for something.
MrBrosef is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 07:47 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by MrBrosef
I don't see RAH getting a pay cut anytime in the near future. If they did give me a pay cut well...... I can't talk about it in public or else someone will try and sue me for something.
Totally understand. I don't think you took it that way, but to be clear, I didn't throw the 50 seat bit out there to be an A$$, mainly to point out the double edged sword that 50 seat flying is becoming.

It just really jumped out to me in the investors conference call last week how the non-F9 RAH discussion kept coming back to 50 seat economics, CHQ and the thought that their may still be opportunities in the 50 seat market IF the RAH could get costs in line. Something like 1200 50 seaters still in service, but the number is projected to drop significantly. Sounds like RAH would like to remain a player in the 50 seat "space", but the discussion was clearly centered around the limitations on being able to do so. Supply is going to outstrip demand in the coming years and the market will dictate (who is the lowest bidder?) which regionals will be the players in the 50 seat world.

There was talk of restructuring $40M-$60M out of CHQ costs including "Human Productivity" savings. There was also talk in the call that the Company wants to get a deal done with the pilots soon (you've probably heard that before so not sure how serious that is). I hope you all get some nice QOL and pay improvements over there, but the realist in me can't figure out it can be done for all A/C types. Maybe 70 seaters and up, but the 50 seaters are going to get dinged (IMO) if they are to remain in service for RAH.

If you haven't already done so, take a listen to the conference call.
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 12:27 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
slumav505's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 456
Default

There will be no pay cut on 50 seaters Herr. The greivanced filed by all the FO's now senior to guys making more coin would result in a large backpay grievance or so much training it would.make your head spin. Not getting any money from me. If they want it they can go ch11 to get it, which is the end of F9 BB WH and Co.
slumav505 is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 02:18 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Mulva
InsideOut,

I'm done swaying as that's a lost cause, plus you guys are big boys and don't need anyone else telling you what to do. Now, of course, me being the dumb a$$ F9 troll that I am, I do appreciate your efforts to keep me informed of all the excellent benefits the brotherhood has in store for me once I pony up the extra $8 bucks a month to become a full fledged card carrying member.

I'm pretty sure I get almost ALL of those benefits right now except for having a vote. IBT357 has an obligation to properly administer the F9 CBA and protect the interests of Frontier pilots by defending and upholding what was previously bargained for in that CBA.

That's all I care about. I have no interest in the 15% AT&T wireless discount (or the $36 activation fee waiver), the Teamster privilege credit card, vision care, mortgage, or auto, homeowner's and renters insurance deals. I'm a Mac guys so don't need the Dell discount. If I run into trouble with the Feds, FAPAs (STILL HERE....did you see their LM-2?) got my back with Legal fee support so I don't need the Teamsters legal services. There is a chance that I could someday use the Teamsters UnionPlus florists discount, but I'll roll the dice on that one.
I saw the LM2. How close are you to the top of the old FAPA regime? That LM2 says a lot.
G-Dog is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 03:06 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

Oh mulva, you have such a wonderfully perdictable foresight into the future of RAH...cant wait to see what you'll think in the very near future. Horray horray May is near.
sticky is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 03:23 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Default

There is comfort in consistency.

Claude Rains will have an easier time now that everyone is here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtSmfws0_To
Hetman is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 06:06 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by G-Dog
I saw the LM2. How close are you to the top of the old FAPA regime? That LM2 says a lot.
You talking about the $162K list in Schedule 11? Sorry to say, my name isn't on that list.
Mulva is offline  
Old 04-29-2012, 06:10 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mulva's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: A-320 Asst. Pilot
Posts: 423
Default

Originally Posted by sticky
Oh mulva, you have such a wonderfully perdictable foresight into the future of RAH...cant wait to see what you'll think in the very near future. Horray horray May is near.
Yo Stinky. I haven't a clue about the future of RAH. All I can do is comment on what was discussed on the conference call. Sounds like something big coming your guys way this week, huh? Like I've said before, I hope it all works out and you all get what you are after.

Time for me to go back on sabbatical unless you all want me hanging out. Always happy to throw in my 2 cents, but I'm ready for a rest.

later.
Mulva is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
SF340guy
Union Talk
92
06-12-2011 06:30 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
av8tordude
Regional
2
09-03-2008 05:30 PM
Frisky Pilot
Major
0
06-23-2005 02:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices