Republic update
#91
As for ULCC, that term seems to be associated with Allegiant and Spirit, which are both profitable airlines. They are also airlines that passengers aren't real thrilled with, but they still fly em. ULCC as has recently been mentioned in relation to F9 really means nothing more than having a VERY competitive CASM (sub 6 cents I believe is the goal). The Company briefly addressed this in passing during the investors conference call when it was mentioned that the goal is to be a ULCC while maintaining a quality product and customer loyalty (paraphrased there).
Why do you have so much heart for an airline name that has been around the block 2 times now? Also the name has been merged with I don't know how many but I think since 1950 and including all the carriers at RAH it's around 15 or so different carriers
The current Frontier Airlines was essentially a start-up using the same name and involving certain executives of the first Frontier. So until BK 4 years ago and acquisition by RAH and merger with YX, this Frontier was never involved in BK, acquisition or merger. Somehow the airline managed to operate on its own for the better part of 14 years before things fell apart. Lots of growth and movement. I showed up 2 years before BK and I'm about 50% up the FO list. QOL has always been great, schedules (until recently) too. We don't make top dollar, but an FO can easily make $80K plus with 17 days off while CA's can do the same making $140Kish. And with very nice work rules and flexibility. Not too bad. It's been a great place to work and we all want to see it last. Maybe it won't , but we are certainly willing to see it through.
BTW, it's not very often that someone attacks the RAHbros because of the crappy contract or pay you guys have. None of that is your fault. We may point out that your Union hasn't returned much for your money and that you can't expect "JetBlue" rates on the 190 if you hope to keep your jobs (sounds like the CHQ guys might want to be concerned about actually seeing a pay cut on the 50 seaters). That CHQ bit is not flame bait, but a reality (listen to the conference call). Regionals are Regionals, some better the others. RAH has always had a reputation of being less the labor friendly. I was at SkyWest. I liked it there and left after 3.5 years for a place I liked better. I hope you all are eventually able to say the same thing.
So MrBrosef, I'm hoping your questions were asked in good faith because the answers I provided assumed so.
Last edited by Mulva; 04-28-2012 at 06:06 PM.
#92
If the fact that pilots don't choose which cities are domiciles is "sticking it to you", then they stuck it to us. Otherwise, we'd have about 30 domiciles with 1-5 pilots each.
They tried doing that same thing to CHQ in new York. We have a LGA base and we do a crap tone of Delta flying out of JFK so they tried making "new York" base. Union got involved and didn't let the company do it.
So yeah I guess there is a difference. Also I thought there was something in your contract about opening bases?
#93
So MrBrosef, I'm hoping your questions were asked in good faith because the answers I provided assumed so.
I messed this quote stuff up lol because I wanted to answer another of your statements
I don't see RAH getting a pay cut anytime in the near future. If they did give me a pay cut well...... I can't talk about it in public or else someone will try and sue me for something.
#94
It just really jumped out to me in the investors conference call last week how the non-F9 RAH discussion kept coming back to 50 seat economics, CHQ and the thought that their may still be opportunities in the 50 seat market IF the RAH could get costs in line. Something like 1200 50 seaters still in service, but the number is projected to drop significantly. Sounds like RAH would like to remain a player in the 50 seat "space", but the discussion was clearly centered around the limitations on being able to do so. Supply is going to outstrip demand in the coming years and the market will dictate (who is the lowest bidder?) which regionals will be the players in the 50 seat world.
There was talk of restructuring $40M-$60M out of CHQ costs including "Human Productivity" savings. There was also talk in the call that the Company wants to get a deal done with the pilots soon (you've probably heard that before so not sure how serious that is). I hope you all get some nice QOL and pay improvements over there, but the realist in me can't figure out it can be done for all A/C types. Maybe 70 seaters and up, but the 50 seaters are going to get dinged (IMO) if they are to remain in service for RAH.
If you haven't already done so, take a listen to the conference call.
#95
There will be no pay cut on 50 seaters Herr. The greivanced filed by all the FO's now senior to guys making more coin would result in a large backpay grievance or so much training it would.make your head spin. Not getting any money from me. If they want it they can go ch11 to get it, which is the end of F9 BB WH and Co.
#96
InsideOut,
I'm done swaying as that's a lost cause, plus you guys are big boys and don't need anyone else telling you what to do. Now, of course, me being the dumb a$$ F9 troll that I am, I do appreciate your efforts to keep me informed of all the excellent benefits the brotherhood has in store for me once I pony up the extra $8 bucks a month to become a full fledged card carrying member.
I'm pretty sure I get almost ALL of those benefits right now except for having a vote. IBT357 has an obligation to properly administer the F9 CBA and protect the interests of Frontier pilots by defending and upholding what was previously bargained for in that CBA.
That's all I care about. I have no interest in the 15% AT&T wireless discount (or the $36 activation fee waiver), the Teamster privilege credit card, vision care, mortgage, or auto, homeowner's and renters insurance deals. I'm a Mac guys so don't need the Dell discount. If I run into trouble with the Feds, FAPAs (STILL HERE....did you see their LM-2?) got my back with Legal fee support so I don't need the Teamsters legal services. There is a chance that I could someday use the Teamsters UnionPlus florists discount, but I'll roll the dice on that one.
I'm done swaying as that's a lost cause, plus you guys are big boys and don't need anyone else telling you what to do. Now, of course, me being the dumb a$$ F9 troll that I am, I do appreciate your efforts to keep me informed of all the excellent benefits the brotherhood has in store for me once I pony up the extra $8 bucks a month to become a full fledged card carrying member.
I'm pretty sure I get almost ALL of those benefits right now except for having a vote. IBT357 has an obligation to properly administer the F9 CBA and protect the interests of Frontier pilots by defending and upholding what was previously bargained for in that CBA.
That's all I care about. I have no interest in the 15% AT&T wireless discount (or the $36 activation fee waiver), the Teamster privilege credit card, vision care, mortgage, or auto, homeowner's and renters insurance deals. I'm a Mac guys so don't need the Dell discount. If I run into trouble with the Feds, FAPAs (STILL HERE....did you see their LM-2?) got my back with Legal fee support so I don't need the Teamsters legal services. There is a chance that I could someday use the Teamsters UnionPlus florists discount, but I'll roll the dice on that one.
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
There is comfort in consistency.
Claude Rains will have an easier time now that everyone is here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtSmfws0_To
Claude Rains will have an easier time now that everyone is here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtSmfws0_To
#99
#100
Time for me to go back on sabbatical unless you all want me hanging out. Always happy to throw in my 2 cents, but I'm ready for a rest.
later.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post