Republic 190's
#11
You are confused. BB is selling ERJs because they are unprofitable in the branded operation. One of two scenarios is likely.
1. He will BUY Airbus aircraft with the money he gets from selling ERJs.
2. The buyer of Frontier doesn't want the 190s and they can't be used elsewhere in the RAH network.
1. He will BUY Airbus aircraft with the money he gets from selling ERJs.
2. The buyer of Frontier doesn't want the 190s and they can't be used elsewhere in the RAH network.
#12
One list would have been fine if it was a realistic list that was fair and equitable to all parties. Unfortunately, the IBT chose not to participate in a reasonable mediation with the other parties.
Instead the IBT 'shot for the moon' with arbitrator Eishen and got it.
The resulting lopsided, unrealistic SLI guaranteed that the groups could never work together on any kind of 'one list', and as such, guaranteed a separation/sale of the Frontier product.
If the IBT had agreed to a reasonable mediated solution, 'one list' could have been workable and beneficial for all parties.
Instead, you will see Frontier sold. You will also see your 190s and some smaller branded ERJs disappear. Thank you IBT.
Instead the IBT 'shot for the moon' with arbitrator Eishen and got it.
The resulting lopsided, unrealistic SLI guaranteed that the groups could never work together on any kind of 'one list', and as such, guaranteed a separation/sale of the Frontier product.
If the IBT had agreed to a reasonable mediated solution, 'one list' could have been workable and beneficial for all parties.
Instead, you will see Frontier sold. You will also see your 190s and some smaller branded ERJs disappear. Thank you IBT.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Originally Posted by ColdWhiskey:1071779
Instead the IBT 'shot for the moon' with arbitrator Eishen and got it.
The resulting lopsided, unrealistic SLI guaranteed that the groups could never work together on any kind of 'one list', and as such, guaranteed a separation/sale of the Frontier product.
If the IBT had agreed to a reasonable mediated solution, 'one list' could have been workable and beneficial for all parties.
Instead, you will see Frontier sold. You will also see your 190s and some smaller branded ERJs disappear. Thank you IBT.
Just want to make one point clear, we would LOVE to see the frontier side sold. RAH would lose a few airplanes, but its a small price to pay for ridding yourself of an endless money pit. On that note, as long as f9 is a part of RAH, there needs to be one list, end of story.
#16
Just want to make one point clear, we would LOVE to see the frontier side sold. RAH would lose a few airplanes, but its a small price to pay for ridding yourself of an endless money pit. On that note, as long as f9 is a part of RAH, there needs to be one list, end of story.
#18
You might want to look at the company website again, click on the link and look at the 3 shinny E170 that are up for sale/lease. Could this be more management games, just like the furloughs - only time will tell!
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Originally Posted by Car Ramrod:1071912
Just want to make one point clear, we would LOVE to see the frontier side sold. RAH would lose a few airplanes, but its a small price to pay for ridding yourself of an endless money pit. On that note, as long as f9 is a part of RAH, there needs to be one list, end of story.
As much as you hate it, its just seniority. The list is what it is no matter how much you wish otherwise. If a sale occurs, there are many variables to consider. Does the fence ensure only f9 pilots go? Better question is will the buyer want to keep the pilots? A million things need to happen before a lawsuit would be in consideration. To answer your question directly, i dont have a clue what the ibt would do.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post