Why Would You Come to YX?
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,079
#42
The poster literally explained why and it didn’t have anything to do with “engine under wing time.”
#43
I actually think it will be easier to get hired at a Major working for republic than other regionals, think about it like this. When they (AA) hire someone from a WO they have to dish out a massive bonus, makes more sense to hire someone from RPA for free. The big bonus is designed to keep their regionals staffed and pilots waiting for the flow.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,290
Well, they can hire them or they won't. Either way pilots are moving on to bigger and better things at record numbers here. If the big three don't hire them there are plenty of other places that will take RPA pilots like LCCs, Cargo, etc. There is nothing like flow or bonuses too keep the pilots here. Either hire them now or not only lose them to some other place where they aren't helping out the Big three system at all, but where they will be directly competing with it as well.
#45
I actually think it will be easier to get hired at a Major working for republic than other regionals, think about it like this. When they (AA) hire someone from a WO they have to dish out a massive bonus, makes more sense to hire someone from RPA for free. The big bonus is designed to keep their regionals staffed and pilots waiting for the flow.
And regarding WOs, the legacies that own them (key word: own) aren’t going to let them fail any more than General Motors would let a subsidiary fail. Pilots are the commodity at the moment. If they let a regional fail, they lose the pilots. They are obviously not going to let that happen. So no, the rest of the industry besides SkyWest and Endeavor are not on life support. The United Express side will likely go through a couple of transformative years though, to include SkyWest.
#46
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
It’s probably why you see regional FO’s go to ULCC’s, get 737 time, and never see the left seat before being hired by a legacy carrier.
Last edited by KirillTheThrill; 09-12-2021 at 06:07 PM.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,079
I’ve been told through a solid source awhile ago airline apps actually does score your app with higher total points if you compare 1,000 hours of turbine time in a 50 seater compared to 70-76 seater. It has nothing to do with seats or engine location, but weight. So technically E170-75 time would be more valued if that holds true.
#48
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
While I do see the point and if that holds true. I just don't think there's one place better to go to get a major. Especially now with hiring picking up and only to continue to increase over the next 5 years. Plus if that is the case it's scored higher well in 2 more years Endeavor is losing all its 50 seaters....but we will see if delta sticks to that. Then that will make 9E one of the best places to go. Even though we lost 41 Capts and 26 FOs to other carriers since July.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,079
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 404
I’ve been told through a solid source airline apps actually will score your app with higher total points if you compare 1,000 hours of turbine time in a 50 seater compared to 70-76 seater. It has nothing to do with seats or engine location, but weight. So technically E175 time would be more valued if that holds true.
It’s probably why you see regional FO’s go to ULCC’s, get 737 time, and never see the left seat before being hired by a legacy carrier.
It’s probably why you see regional FO’s go to ULCC’s, get 737 time, and never see the left seat before being hired by a legacy carrier.
Considering the CL-65 (the type you should be entering on airlineapps) seats anywhere from 50 to 76 seats (hint: that's the same number as a 175) I would call BS on this """source"""