Search

Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

2018 Tentative Agreement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2018, 04:17 PM
  #251  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 94
Default

If in a merger the different pilot groups cannot agree on how to merge the pilot lists than this applies.

Allegheny-Mohawk, 59 C.A.B. at 45.
Section 13 mandated arbitration of disputes with employees that arose in this process or under any of the other provisions of the Allegheny-Mohawk LPPs.2 Section 13 provides:
In the event that any dispute or controversy (except as to matters arising under section 9) arises with respect to the protections provided herein which cannot be settled by the parties within 20 days after the controversy arises, it may be referred by any party to an arbitrator selected from a panel of seven names furnished by the National Mediation Board for consideration and determination. The parties shall select the arbitrator from such panel by alternatively striking names until only one remains, and he shall serve as arbitrator. Expedited hearings and decisions will be expected, and a decision shall be rendered within 90 days after the controversy arises, unless an extension of time is mutually agreeable to all parties. The salary and expenses of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the carrier and (i) the organization or organizations representing employee or employees or (ii) if unrepresented, the employee or employees or group or groups of employees. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties

Although Midwest airlines was not in bankruptcy protection the arbitrator of the SLI ruled that our career expectations were low and we had no airplanes to bring to the merger. The reason we had no planes was that Republic pilots replaced Midwest routes with EMB 170 and 190 aircraft while the B717s were sent back to Boeing. Midwest airlines operated for a year with Republic pilots and Republic airplanes. That didn't seem to matter to the arbitrator. We basically were the black sheep of the merger. Midwest ALPA scope language was poor so let that be a lesson to you. Republic purchased Frontier and kept the airbuses operating so the Frontier pilots did much better in the SLI. There are many factors that go into "fair and equitable". If your carrier is healthy, you have good scope language and you bring airplanes to the table you should do ok in a merger or acquisition. Solely DOH is never done and McCaskill-Bond came out of the TWA staple by American to prevent that from happening again. As far as longevity for pay and benefits is concerned this was not addressed by the SLI so of course Republic management had no intent on giving us anything. Language means everything!!

Last edited by ex9driver; 01-16-2018 at 04:36 PM.
ex9driver is offline  
Old 01-16-2018, 06:24 PM
  #252  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by ORD170
Agreed about the “toonsters”, but it was more then that. The Lynx guys made out pretty well. The tier 3 republic guys got the shaft.

Most regionals regionals have relatively short upgrades. A three year FO at republic would most likely be junior to a 3 year pilot at TSA, because the TSA pilot would be in the left seat. Who knows though, because it really is up to the arbitrator and bond McCaskill


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I guess that depends on how you define "pretty well". Going from being a senior line holding CA to sitting reserve in the same airplane, base and seat for 4+ years certainly doesn't meet my definition of "pretty well".
RAHsux is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 08:14 AM
  #253  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 45
Default

I'm sure it is on here somewhere, but I don't feel like looking for it. When is the vote for your proposed TA?
CRJ All Day is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 08:58 AM
  #254  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: C172 Captain
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by CRJ All Day
I'm sure it is on here somewhere, but I don't feel like looking for it. When is the vote for your proposed TA?
Currently in progress until the 29th.
KCaviator is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 09:22 AM
  #255  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by ex9driver
If in a merger the different pilot groups cannot agree on how to merge the pilot lists than this applies.

Allegheny-Mohawk, 59 C.A.B. at 45.
Section 13 mandated arbitration of disputes with employees that arose in this process or under any of the other provisions of the Allegheny-Mohawk LPPs.2 Section 13 provides:
In the event that any dispute or controversy (except as to matters arising under section 9) arises with respect to the protections provided herein which cannot be settled by the parties within 20 days after the controversy arises, it may be referred by any party to an arbitrator selected from a panel of seven names furnished by the National Mediation Board for consideration and determination. The parties shall select the arbitrator from such panel by alternatively striking names until only one remains, and he shall serve as arbitrator. Expedited hearings and decisions will be expected, and a decision shall be rendered within 90 days after the controversy arises, unless an extension of time is mutually agreeable to all parties. The salary and expenses of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the carrier and (i) the organization or organizations representing employee or employees or (ii) if unrepresented, the employee or employees or group or groups of employees. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties

Although Midwest airlines was not in bankruptcy protection the arbitrator of the SLI ruled that our career expectations were low and we had no airplanes to bring to the merger. The reason we had no planes was that Republic pilots replaced Midwest routes with EMB 170 and 190 aircraft while the B717s were sent back to Boeing. Midwest airlines operated for a year with Republic pilots and Republic airplanes. That didn't seem to matter to the arbitrator. We basically were the black sheep of the merger. Midwest ALPA scope language was poor so let that be a lesson to you. Republic purchased Frontier and kept the airbuses operating so the Frontier pilots did much better in the SLI. There are many factors that go into "fair and equitable". If your carrier is healthy, you have good scope language and you bring airplanes to the table you should do ok in a merger or acquisition. Solely DOH is never done and McCaskill-Bond came out of the TWA staple by American to prevent that from happening again. As far as longevity for pay and benefits is concerned this was not addressed by the SLI so of course Republic management had no intent on giving us anything. Language means everything!!
Midwest was screwed with the replacement of aircraft however after that was done many of them openly said they would never come over and fly for a regional. So how they fared in an SLI did not mean much to most of them. No one was ever going to be allowed to bid for F9 vacancies, Bedford said that from the beginning and he followed through. Not to mention F9 probably should have never been involved in the whole thing given that SWA was actively attempting to acquire them mainly for A gates in DEN. My understanding is they wanted a staple and F9 pilots said no. Now I know a staple is bad, but if it comes down to joining SWA or a regional I think the choice is clear. It was also noted at the time that most of the F9 pilots had put in applications at SWA over the years. A large number of Lynx pilots were put ahead of RAH people that were on property before Lynx even existed. I was tier 3 RAH at the time and I walked away from RAH years ago in pure disgust of their dealings. It will be sad to watch it happen all over again, Bedford is still there and will likely repeat past practices.

Side note: I have heard from many former TWA pilots that claim that ALPA sold them down the river on the staple in hopes of getting AA to vote in ALPA. I am not sure if there is any truth to that.
sflpilot is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 09:36 AM
  #256  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by sflpilot
Midwest was screwed with the replacement of aircraft however after that was done many of them openly said they would never come over and fly for a regional. So how they fared in an SLI did not mean much to most of them. No one was ever going to be allowed to bid for F9 vacancies, Bedford said that from the beginning and he followed through. Not to mention F9 probably should have never been involved in the whole thing given that SWA was actively attempting to acquire them mainly for A gates in DEN. My understanding is they wanted a staple and F9 pilots said no. Now I know a staple is bad, but if it comes down to joining SWA or a regional I think the choice is clear. It was also noted at the time that most of the F9 pilots had put in applications at SWA over the years. A large number of Lynx pilots were put ahead of RAH people that were on property before Lynx even existed. I was tier 3 RAH at the time and I walked away from RAH years ago in pure disgust of their dealings. It will be sad to watch it happen all over again, Bedford is still there and will likely repeat past practices.

Side note: I have heard from many former TWA pilots that claim that ALPA sold them down the river on the staple in hopes of getting AA to vote in ALPA. I am not sure if there is any truth to that.
An example of Bedford's past practices that many may not be aware of. He not only isolated F9 from the other three airlines in terms of bidding, but after the vote in which the IBT won the representation election most of the F9 pilots refused to pay dues. Not only did Bedford refuse to allow terminations which is what would normally happen, he gave them the blessing to keep FAPA up and running. That is how insidious the guy is. He single handedly circumvented the RAH CBA provisions and tainted every aspect of the process. All current RAH pilots need to watch their backs if there is another complex merger, he will pull out his bag of tricks again.
sflpilot is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 10:06 AM
  #257  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 689
Default

After some debate it’s a no vote for me this morning. Can’t bring myself to vote for something that doesn’t further this industry. I think it’s going to be close honestly. In that case perhaps we’ll see a quick turn around in the negotiations but with something better to push it to a yes.
knewyork is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 11:55 AM
  #258  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by sflpilot
An example of Bedford's past practices that many may not be aware of. He not only isolated F9 from the other three airlines in terms of bidding, but after the vote in which the IBT won the representation election most of the F9 pilots refused to pay dues. Not only did Bedford refuse to allow terminations which is what would normally happen, he gave them the blessing to keep FAPA up and running. That is how insidious the guy is. He single handedly circumvented the RAH CBA provisions and tainted every aspect of the process. All current RAH pilots need to watch their backs if there is another complex merger, he will pull out his bag of tricks again.


I don’t think that would happen if it were another regional. Also BB was trying to split the pilot group to his benefit. The whole frontier thing was a mess, and having a regional CEO running it made it worse. He wasn’t the only bad management we had prior to the 2015 CBA. They all sucked, but he was the person he pushed for that culture. When this gets voted down, he may be gone. If not it will probably take a year for a complete CBA. Maybe longer. This loa isn’t even 1 article....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ORD170 is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 01:13 PM
  #259  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by ORD170
I don’t think that would happen if it were another regional. Also BB was trying to split the pilot group to his benefit. The whole frontier thing was a mess, and having a regional CEO running it made it worse. He wasn’t the only bad management we had prior to the 2015 CBA. They all sucked, but he was the person he pushed for that culture. When this gets voted down, he may be gone. If not it will probably take a year for a complete CBA. Maybe longer. This loa isn’t even 1 article....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Bedford is probably gonna be gone regardless of the vote by this spring. The process of doing a complete CBA will take closer to 4 years, not 4 months. Also, the LOA touches 6 articles, not one.
MileHi is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 02:51 PM
  #260  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by MileHi
Bedford is probably gonna be gone regardless of the vote by this spring. The process of doing a complete CBA will take closer to 4 years, not 4 months. Also, the LOA touches 6 articles, not one.


I assume touches means 2-3 things in each of those articles. That’s what I count anyways, and a few are to the benefit of the company. Not much improvements to QOL. I don’t care I already voted no! I suspect it will pass, but it will not change the outcome.

Agreed Bedford will leave, and probably get a hefty bonus after he gets this LOA pushed through.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ORD170 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
skytrekker
Major
1
02-18-2008 02:16 PM
captain_drew
Cargo
3
06-01-2005 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices