Search

Notices
Republic Airways Regional Airline

2018 Tentative Agreement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2018, 02:47 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 689
Default

Originally Posted by blindfayth
Where do you see this?
Messa

_____
knewyork is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 03:29 PM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by TangoIndiaMike1
They are giving 50k bonuses. It’s just over 3 years and if you leave or upgrade you don’t get it.


Who is doing this? Certainly not Republic. If this is going on, nothing in the current CBA stops them from being able to pay that amount. Voting down this TA does not prevent them from paying that amount (except for after a year and then it is limited to 105% of an average amount). As said before, there is a lot of fearmongering and half-truths being spouted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4V14T0R is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 03:30 PM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by knewyork
Messa



_____


Yeah look at their pay and contract. There is a reason they do that. It’s so that JO can snatch it away at any moment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4V14T0R is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 04:45 PM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 328
Default

Try to make it to a road show. The NC member were informative and honest. I didn’t like everything that was said, but it made sense. I’m out of here soon, so this LOA has very little impact on me. I’m a no, because I believe it will negatively impact the profession. Great deal for the 15 plus year guys though....
ORD170 is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 04:54 PM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Base2Final's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Crop duster
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
Who is doing this? Certainly not Republic. If this is going on, nothing in the current CBA stops them from being able to pay that amount. Voting down this TA does not prevent them from paying that amount (except for after a year and then it is limited to 105% of an average amount). As said before, there is a lot of fearmongering and half-truths being spouted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RAH can not spread it out over 3 years on current book.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Base2Final is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 04:56 PM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Base2Final's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Crop duster
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by Base2Final
RAH can not spread it out over 3 years on current book. And it's an industry AVG of bonuses.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Base2Final is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 06:04 PM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sargeanb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: E170 CA
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by flydiamond
Comparing and contrasting QOL to pay rates is comparing to apples to oranges. Match or beat Endeavor pay and then match or beat Endeavor on QOL matters. That's how you obtain an industry leading contract and staff the airline. Why do you think Delta and United keep matching each other on pay? Is QOL contract language identical at those two carriers? Of course not.

Also, I am not too familiar with the Republic contract and company culture/management friendliness but you have grossly overstated QOL shortcomings at Endeavor. As I have stated here as have numerous other Endeavor pilots, we have much better than average language on scheduling, premium pay, reserve rules, etc and in my opinion a great culture. additionally, many times scheduling and management goes above and beyond the contract to keep us happy... e.g. Providing hotels and positive space travel prior to IOE, early reserve release, matching 401k catch-up contributions (that's $6000 for any pilot over 50 who wishes to participate!!). Please stop ****ting on our company to sell your lackluster contract.
You get it. The vast majority of us here at RAH expected at least Endeavor rates. I was pretty surprised that this TA did not get us that. As far as new hires, sure QOL and bases are important, but the main thing that will attract new hires is the pay rates. Not bonuses...base pay. Do they really think new hires will flock here with rates well under Endeavor’s? The pay rates are also an important aspect in keeping old workhorses like myself here...or at least from jumping ship to a ULCC or ACMI cargo carrier. If the majors call, we’re all out of here, nothing will change that. I appreciate what the union is doing for us, but this one just isn’t good enough. We’re in a pretty good position. Our current contract isn’t terrible, and the company is profitable. We can afford to hold out for better.

Last edited by sargeanb; 01-11-2018 at 06:21 PM.
sargeanb is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 06:37 PM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by Base2Final
RAH can not spread it out over 3 years on current book.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


That’s true, but the goal as stated from the outset was to be able to attract and retain not just retain. As I stated previously no negotiation will 100% go our way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4V14T0R is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 08:56 PM
  #199  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 37
Default

If Republic, and all the other regionals, would keep voting NO to these proposals that involve new hire bonuses....it would force the majors to take this flying back in house and this nonsense would end. Most of you may not remember this, but there was a time when these code-sharing regionals did not exist. There was NEVER a time when it made sense for a pilot to give up his pay to offer a bonus to someone who isn’t even an employee yet.

Look further ahead than next year. THIS INDUSTRY CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE 2000 PILOTS IN ONE FELL SWOOP. Stand strong, vote NO. You will not only survive, but you will prosper.
Snowbound is offline  
Old 01-11-2018, 09:04 PM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by Snowbound
If Republic, and all the other regionals, would keep voting NO to these proposals that involve new hire bonuses....it would force the majors to take this flying back in house and this nonsense would end. Most of you may not remember this, but there was a time when these code-sharing regionals did not exist. There was NEVER a time when it made sense for a pilot to give up his pay to offer a bonus to someone who isn’t even an employee yet.



Look further ahead than next year. THIS INDUSTRY CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE 2000 PILOTS IN ONE FELL SWOOP. Stand strong, vote NO. You will not only survive, but you will prosper.


You’re right, but apparently there are provisions in our CPAs that if the airline starts to fail at meeting its metric the flying will be removed incrementally to prevent that one fell swoop. Apparently this provision was added by our codeshare partners when we went through BK. So we shrink to profitability. We need to be able to attract and retain. So anyone who says we as pilots don’t need to worry about attracting new pilots doesn’t realize the larger picture. Of course most of us don’t want to be here longer than we have to, but if something like this does happen there will be people here that will have to deal with this and it will have a negative effect on them. So it does in fact benefit us as pilots to worry about recruitment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4V14T0R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
skytrekker
Major
1
02-18-2008 02:16 PM
captain_drew
Cargo
3
06-01-2005 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices