Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
XNA instrument approaches >

XNA instrument approaches

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XNA instrument approaches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2017, 08:20 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SureJetStick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: to the right of left
Posts: 126
Default XNA instrument approaches

Are they all notam out, and if so anyone know why?
SureJetStick is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:30 AM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

They built a new runway (34), and decommissioned the old one (35).

They are installing an ILS for 34, but it's not up yet so only non-precision approaches are available.

Yes, it's a problem and yes you might have to divert. Tailwinds can compound the problem.

I'm hoping to not go back there until the ILS works.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:41 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
VanDriver208's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Full Nelson
Posts: 367
Default

They picked a great time of year to NOTAM a bunch of approaches out of service!
VanDriver208 is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:44 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 453
Default

Anyone know why they built the new runway?
Maingear is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 09:24 AM
  #5  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,841
Default

Originally Posted by Maingear
Anyone know why they built the new runway?
I don't know all the details, but basically since they only had 1 runway and it needed to be redone, they built an "alternate landing surface" parallel to the original runway. Somehow on the redo of the original runway something wasn't done to spec and it sat several years unused while they sorted all that out. I guess now the redone runway will finally be opened?
tennisguru is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:27 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by Maingear
Anyone know why they built the new runway?
I don't know if it was planned this way - but from my understanding, the *new* parallel runway was built to close to the original runway and they will be using the *old* runway as a parallel surface as a taxiway.

This could be an old wive's tale
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:33 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,342
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I don't know if it was planned this way - but from my understanding, the *new* parallel runway was built to close to the original runway and they will be using the *old* runway as a parallel surface as a taxiway.

This could be an old wive's tale
I don't think XNA is big enough to warrant parallel runways. I think the previous post about needing a new runway was more accurate. It may have something to do with a minimum distance needed between the runway and the parallel taxiway. I know a few airports that had to move the runway further from the taxiway.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:45 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
E175 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: E175
Posts: 686
Default

The whole airport was shut down yesterday due to errors on instrument approaches and no runway lights.
E175 Driver is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:58 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by E175 Driver
The whole airport was shut down yesterday due to errors on instrument approaches and no runway lights.
That's not true at all. The airline I work for operated all of its flights there yesterday.
N6279P is offline  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:58 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I don't know if it was planned this way - but from my understanding, the *new* parallel runway was built to close to the original runway and they will be using the *old* runway as a parallel surface as a taxiway.

This could be an old wive's tale
That's what ground told me when I asked.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
SongMan
Flight Schools and Training
18
06-08-2014 08:31 AM
jmcmanna
Safety
3
12-05-2012 07:01 PM
PiperPower
Military
40
07-09-2009 06:44 PM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
14
03-15-2006 01:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices