XNA instrument approaches

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 2

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-06-2017, 11:00 AM

#11

E175 Driver

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: May 2016

Position: E175

Posts: 686

Quote:

Originally Posted by N6279P

That's not true at all. The airline I work for operated all of its flights there yesterday.

Mesa??....

01-06-2017, 11:27 AM

#12

toolowterrain

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jul 2013

Position: RJ

Posts: 215

Similar thing in Ashville, NC.

Single runway at airport needed to be extended. So they built a temp runway right next to it and numbered it 35 instead if 34.

Never knew how wide 150' is till I landed in a 100' wide runway on the RJ in hard IMC. Im sure the airbus folks love it also. At least the put an ILS on the temp. runway there.

01-06-2017, 02:58 PM

#13

USMCFLYR

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Mar 2008

Position: FAA 'Flight Check'

Posts: 13,839

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine

I don't think XNA is big enough to warrant parallel runways. I think the previous post about needing a new runway was more accurate. It may have something to do with a minimum distance needed between the runway and the parallel taxiway. I know a few airports that had to move the runway further from the taxiway.

And maybe that was the 'too close' part - but that original runway and parallel runway was there for a LONG time before they started building that new runway. I'll agree with you that KXNA doesn't seem to have the traffic to *need* two runways. Maybe if I'm there working on some of the recent procedures/etc... I'll have the chance to engage the airport authority and satisfy my curiousity.