Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional Hiring Already Slowing? >

Regional Hiring Already Slowing?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional Hiring Already Slowing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016, 04:13 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: CL65
Posts: 955
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
I never understood the "golden handcuffs" argument from regional lifers.

Plenty of guys in their 40s are starting over at the bottom of the majors, with all of the same family, kids, money, and quality of life challenges mentioned above.

Our families are more important than our careers, too...and that "marginal benefit" obtained by the "upheaval" of moving on to a major airline is to the tune of about $3+ million of additional income (depending on where you go to work, of course) over the course of the rest of the flying career. In addition, once you get past those initial painful years of reserve, commuting, etc, the schedules and work rules are substantially better at the majors than at the regionals. That translates to more time at home for the next couple decades -- if you so choose to even work that long, since smart financial planning will allow you to retire before 65 (or 67!).

Yes, the upheaval is a pain in the dong, but if you really care about your family life then the financial and schedule reward they will pretty quickly have after you've made the jump to the majors is a worthy payoff.

Anyone who will take the time to sit down and run the numbers can see this if they want to. Unfortunately, I think so many lifers can't get past the very temporary pain of bottom-of-the-list reserve and commutes to crappy domiciles. I get it that some folks have a schedule and money that they are "content" with, and have heard all of the "there are things more important than money" arguments, but ultimately the benefit on the other side of the pain is just too good to pass up, IMHO.
I complete agree with this. Your arguments are sound.

Some people, however, are afraid of giving up their quality of life as a senior line holder. Some like the power that comes with being the top guy. Some don't want to be subservient again as an FO (their ego's can't handle it). Others are afraid of moving out of the little pond to the ocean. It is like the kids that grow up in a small town with limited opportunities. Most leave, but there are always the ones that will stay in that small town, passing up numerous opportunities, and blame it on family or tradition.

The benefits are much better at the majors, but to some people, it just isn't worth it.
CLT Guy is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 05:26 AM
  #52  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 615
Default

Nice reasoning from both sides, thanks. Do whatever y'all want is my motto, just so long as you are happy. If you want to stay at your regional, stay. At the end of the day it is indeed less competition for those of us who have to fight tooth and nail to land a job with a legacy.
Duesenflieger is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 06:03 AM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: CRJ
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
Not sure I understand. Are you insinuating there is no pilot shortage? There used to be a lot of not believers but the way things have been in the last year (regionals falling over each other begging for pilots to work for them when they hit 1500 hours and constantly one upping each other on compensation to try to attract new hires) I honestly didn't think there were too many left that would try to say there isn't a shortage of pilots.
I see in another of your posts that you are approaching 1500 hours this January and have "regionals knocking at your door". Not sure if you're aware, but that was not typical for regionals until lately when they started having difficulty finding applicants.
The term "shortage" is a political term, not an economic term. In a free market when the demand rises the compensation should rise until the supply meets the demand. The airlines have been holding down the pay and talking "shortage" when the problem is lack of pay. I have a lot of experienced friends who are not going to work for 35k a year. Along with commute or other costs it is not worth it for a lot of guys who don't have 30 years left to fly. Show me the money and there will be a lot of pilots who will come fly.
MrSkywest is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 07:27 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
I think the AAs are going to have the new-hire market cornered with those bonuses, upped pay and flow.
eny received over 1000 apps in the last 2 weeks..
unity2010 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 08:21 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e
I never understood the "golden handcuffs" argument from regional lifers.

Plenty of guys in their 40s are starting over at the bottom of the majors, with all of the same family, kids, money, and quality of life challenges mentioned above.

Our families are more important than our careers, too...and that "marginal benefit" obtained by the "upheaval" of moving on to a major airline is to the tune of about $3+ million of additional income (depending on where you go to work, of course) over the course of the rest of the flying career. In addition, once you get past those initial painful years of reserve, commuting, etc, the schedules and work rules are substantially better at the majors than at the regionals. That translates to more time at home for the next couple decades -- if you so choose to even work that long, since smart financial planning will allow you to retire before 65 (or 67!).

Yes, the upheaval is a pain in the dong, but if you really care about your family life then the financial and schedule reward they will pretty quickly have after you've made the jump to the majors is a worthy payoff.

Anyone who will take the time to sit down and run the numbers can see this if they want to. Unfortunately, I think so many lifers can't get past the very temporary pain of bottom-of-the-list reserve and commutes to crappy domiciles. I get it that some folks have a schedule and money that they are "content" with, and have heard all of the "there are things more important than money" arguments, but ultimately the benefit on the other side of the pain is just too good to pass up, IMHO.
I agree with all that. I think some regional "lifers" WAY underemphasize this. Maybe back when first year pay was in the 20's and 30's (not that long ago) you could see doing that. But now its in the 80's with ultra fast wide body and even upgrade opportunities, etc that unless you're a triple dipping check airman contract ninja it rarely, if ever, makes long term sense not to make the move. Not to mention that if you truly "can't afford" to go all the way down to the 80's for one year in exchange for likely a million or more in career earnings, you're not managing your finances very well.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 09:38 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I agree with all that. I think some regional "lifers" WAY underemphasize this. Maybe back when first year pay was in the 20's and 30's (not that long ago) you could see doing that. But now its in the 80's with ultra fast wide body and even upgrade opportunities, etc that unless you're a triple dipping check airman contract ninja it rarely, if ever, makes long term sense not to make the move. Not to mention that if you truly "can't afford" to go all the way down to the 80's for one year in exchange for likely a million or more in career earnings, you're not managing your finances very well.
Talking to the old timers, I've figured it's much more psychological than logical. People feel secure with what they have, they know what to expect, no surprises. They are NOT risk takers, and therefore hold themselves back from career earning potentials for less money and more security.
It's always a risk changing shops, but in my personal opinion, the biggest one is not taking that risk.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:08 AM
  #57  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Broke
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by unity2010
eny received over 1000 apps in the last 2 weeks..
Sure they did....
Is offline is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:20 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by MrSkywest
The term "shortage" is a political term, not an economic term. In a free market when the demand rises the compensation should rise until the supply meets the demand. The airlines have been holding down the pay and talking "shortage" when the problem is lack of pay. I have a lot of experienced friends who are not going to work for 35k a year. Along with commute or other costs it is not worth it for a lot of guys who don't have 30 years left to fly. Show me the money and there will be a lot of pilots who will come fly.
You can call it whatever you would like. Like you say it's a term. The word shortage simple means we don't have enough as we need.
If I don't have enough money to pay my rent, I will have insufficient funds. That does not mean that there aren't funds in someone else's possession or elsewhere in the world or that I can't make changes that would increase my funds, but as far as I would be concerned I would currently have a shortage of funds.
Now you argue that they exist they just are actively flying. Great. But many of the ones you speak of have zero interest in ever returning to the 121 world or even aviation at all no matter what the pay. Some have been burned too many times and are now content with their career in other fields and being home every night with their families. Also some of those guys likely can't come back to the 121 world even if they would like to. Some likely medically and some at an age that wouldn't make any sense to restart from the bottom.
I agree there has for many years been (and still is) a pay shortage. But you're lying to yourself if you don't think the pay shortage created a pilot shortage. It caused people to go into other industries with no intention to return and stunted new pilot interest with low pay and high cost of training.
RemoveB4Flight is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:37 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
You can call it whatever you would like. Like you say it's a term. The word shortage simple means we don't have enough as we need.
If I don't have enough money to pay my rent, I will have insufficient funds. That does not mean that there aren't funds in someone else's possession or elsewhere in the world or that I can't make changes that would increase my funds, but as far as I would be concerned I would currently have a shortage of funds.
Now you argue that they exist they just are actively flying. Great. But many of the ones you speak of have zero interest in ever returning to the 121 world or even aviation at all no matter what the pay. Some have been burned too many times and are now content with their career in other fields and being home every night with their families. Also some of those guys likely can't come back to the 121 world even if they would like to. Some likely medically and some at an age that wouldn't make any sense to restart from the bottom.
I agree there has for many years been (and still is) a pay shortage. But you're lying to yourself if you don't think the pay shortage created a pilot shortage. It caused people to go into other industries with no intention to return and stunted new pilot interest with low pay and high cost of training.
It's pretty simple, pay people more money and they will show up. Currently we do not have a pilot shortage. Envoy went from hiring 4-5 pilots per month to 50 pilots per month because of the 175 and higher pay.

So if a regional has a pilot shortage then it is localized to that specific company.
Pedro4President is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:44 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President
It's pretty simple, pay people more money and they will show up. Currently we do not have a pilot shortage. Envoy went from hiring 4-5 pilots per month to 50 pilots per month because of the 175 and higher pay.

So if a regional has a pilot shortage then it is localized to that specific company.
You realize a lot of those applicants are from other regionals right? The regionals they leave are down a person then. At that point you are not adding another pilot to the mix. You are simply moving one. It's a shell game
RemoveB4Flight is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11
Regional
138
06-26-2014 02:02 PM
MunkyButtr
Hiring News
4
08-28-2012 04:05 AM
rickdb
Regional
139
10-17-2007 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices