I don't trust the CRJ-900, and here is why...
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,150
You obviously aren't familiar with the aerodynamics of the EMB 170/175!
(Or a host of other aircraft for that matter.)
But like the Donald, you've been validated. You made noise, people responded. Congrats.
#32
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 6 Train - Panhandler
Posts: 2,001
Yea I suppose when the gut open the airframe during heavy check maintenance, they just OPS check it okay, huh? Tool of the day.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
What are you a structural engineer? I didn't think so. This is one of the stupidest posts ever. Its as stupid as a tweet from Donald Trump.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
This dude is a first class troll....take a look at his recent posts. If you want to be taken seriously provide some data, numbers, whatever.
Coming on here and saying. "I saw a CRJ9 it's too long" isn't proving anything and makes you look like a moron.
Coming on here and saying. "I saw a CRJ9 it's too long" isn't proving anything and makes you look like a moron.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Feito no Brasil, CA
Posts: 833
Yep. Need an engineer here. Going to have to calculate materials fatigue, stresses on a cantilevered pressurized vessel, and then calculate a safe range to operate the aircraft within.
Oh wait, they already did that when they built the aircraft.
Maybe it's up to the people flying the aircraft to keep it within safe parameters?
Oh wait, they already did that when they built the aircraft.
Maybe it's up to the people flying the aircraft to keep it within safe parameters?