I don't trust the CRJ-900, and here is why...
08-03-2016, 05:05 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 505
After being warned that I can't swear on APC because this is, apparently, a forum full of "professionals" I will simply say this:
This is a quality crap post. (replace crap with whatever synonym floats your boat)
This is a quality crap post. (replace crap with whatever synonym floats your boat)
08-03-2016, 05:11 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 123
So you are saying you don't trust Bombardier products ? Because your point regarding basic physics isn't being supported by any evidence or a credible theory. All I hear is crying and *****ing.
08-03-2016, 05:11 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Slightly less broke side of RJ
Posts: 132
Also is incapable of flying due to being way heavier then air.
Source: I looked at a picture of it...and jesus
Source: I looked at a picture of it...and jesus
08-03-2016, 05:35 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Well thank Christ, we have Billy-Bob in the bluuuuuue ridge, sipping on his home made moon shine, while submersing himself in some good ole fashion aerodynamic.
Why don't you leave the aerospace engineering to the professionals.
Why don't you leave the aerospace engineering to the professionals.
08-03-2016, 05:37 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
How to stretch airplanes even more: 
