Deny NAI
04-21-2016, 06:34 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
We live in a global economy now. You have to learn to embrace change, try to figure out how to capitalize from this is the smart move. This is a done deal. Burying your head in the sand isn't going to change anything. A lot of people outside of 50,000 airline pilots have more to gain.
And who's to say how things will turn out, more US airline pilots flying for more carriers with dwindling pilot supplies can only be a good thing for pilots.
Things are always in motion. What will change next? Recinding the 1500 hour rule? Going to age 67? Allowing retiring Captains to sit right seat till 75? Single pilot cockpits? Hyperloop rail?
Alpa is dead. Unions are dead. Try and see the bigger picture.
And who's to say how things will turn out, more US airline pilots flying for more carriers with dwindling pilot supplies can only be a good thing for pilots.
Things are always in motion. What will change next? Recinding the 1500 hour rule? Going to age 67? Allowing retiring Captains to sit right seat till 75? Single pilot cockpits? Hyperloop rail?
Alpa is dead. Unions are dead. Try and see the bigger picture.
04-21-2016, 06:37 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,029
We live in a global economy now. You have to learn to embrace change, try to figure out how to capitalize from this is the smart move. This is a done deal. Burying your head in the sand isn't going to change anything. A lot of people outside of 50,000 airline pilots have more to gain.
And who's to say how things will turn out, more US airline pilots flying for more carriers with dwindling pilot supplies can only be a good thing for pilots.
Things are always in motion. What will change next? Recinding the 1500 hour rule? Going to age 67? Allowing retiring Captains to sit right seat till 75? Single pilot cockpits? Hyperloop rail?
Alpa is dead. Unions are dead. Try and see the bigger picture and position yourself to benefit.
And who's to say how things will turn out, more US airline pilots flying for more carriers with dwindling pilot supplies can only be a good thing for pilots.
Things are always in motion. What will change next? Recinding the 1500 hour rule? Going to age 67? Allowing retiring Captains to sit right seat till 75? Single pilot cockpits? Hyperloop rail?
Alpa is dead. Unions are dead. Try and see the bigger picture and position yourself to benefit.
We do live in a global economy however that doesn't mean you shouldn't fight to keep what you have and what this career can offer. What you are proposing is to the detriment of this career. You can enjoy that for yourself. I will not be joining you. Enjoy selling your soul for a pittance in that 787 seat.
04-21-2016, 06:37 AM
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
04-21-2016, 06:42 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
NAI doesn't hire pilots. That's the point. The Singapore staffing agency hires pilots. You'd have to interview with them. Then they negotiate a deal for compensation with NAI. Which means even less money for you. If they are paying them less than what they would pay for pilots, Singapore Pilot Co would still need a substantial cut to run the company. That's even less wages for you the FO. But in reality, they wouldn't hire you because they'd rather fill that seat with a guy who is fresh out of flight school and willing to work for zero dollars to get flight time.
04-21-2016, 06:48 AM
#25
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
NAI doesn't hire pilots. That's the point. The Singapore staffing agency hires pilots. You'd have to interview with them. Then they negotiate a deal for compensation with NAI. Which means even less money for you. If they are paying them less than what they would pay for pilots, Singapore Pilot Co would still need a substantial cut to run the company. That's even less wages for you the FO. But in reality, they wouldn't hire you because they'd rather fill that seat with a guy who is fresh out of flight school and willing to work for zero dollars to get flight time.
http://www.rishworthaviation.com/Opp...ype-rated.aspx
04-21-2016, 06:55 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
That's what you are too stupid to understand. You aren't working for either of those companies. NAS or Norwegian Long Haul are different companies. The staffing agency is a UK one. NAI will be a deep discount carrier and its staffing agency will be in Singapore. You should ask yourself why, if NAS is doing fine, would they need to use Ireland and Singapore instead of the current model. Think critically for once in your life and quit licking the window.
04-21-2016, 07:02 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
04-21-2016, 07:05 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
04-21-2016, 07:11 AM
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Maybe as a result, the big 3 will decide to have a superior product. There moments away from being regulated anyway. Customer service is terrible.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
