Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
RAH files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy >

RAH files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2016, 10:13 AM
  #231  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
It doesn't necessarily work like that. That can be their request, but if Delta is a major harmed creditor they can push for your contract concessions, so that the savings can be directed to them to help make them whole. It's naive to believe the pain won't be shared by all, or a judge will just pick winners and losers.
Anyone who believes RAH pilots will emerge unscathed are delusional, and are probably the same ones who were discussing their purchase of RJET stock in the last few months. As they say, a fool and his money are soon parted, and a sucker is born every minute. Those who believe management on that email represent the latter.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:14 AM
  #232  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlameNSky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 547
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized
According to financial reports filled with the SEC, Republic owns the majority of their E175s.
With exception of about 6 hulls, AAG is the guarantor on all the AE branded aircraft. Think of it as RAH using AAG's credit to secure financing. As such, Parker has provisions that allow AAG to take those aircraft if Bedford defaults. I don't know if AAG would take them and reassign them to another carrier but legally they could. ( I realize that it would have to be approved by the court but their is no judge in the world that would tell a creditor that they won't let someone else take over the negotiated lease rates and force them to take RAH's deal )
FlameNSky is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:27 AM
  #233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized
I was simply pointing out Republic owns the majority of their aircraft rather than leasing. You assumed I meant they owned their aircraft out right, sorry if I mislead you. As far as I know, there are very few, if any US airlines that pay cash for brand new aircraft. I don't see a huge difference operationally between leasing and owning(financed) in the contract carrier business.
I think there arguing against the notion that RAH has additional security by being the owner/operator of their aircraft versus just an operator of another company's aircraft.
BK law has the power to terminate many signed legal documents, so the security of ownership can become negotiable. When you ask a court for protection to stiff your creditors, it comes with many strings, and some that may not be desirable, even for RAH mgnt.
Waitingformins is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:37 AM
  #234  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 338
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized
I was simply pointing out Republic owns the majority of their aircraft rather than leasing. You assumed I meant they owned their aircraft out right, sorry if I mislead you. As far as I know, there are very few, if any US airlines that pay cash for brand new aircraft. I don't see a huge difference operationally between leasing and owning(financed) in the contract carrier business.
Aren't the aircraft co-financed (or co-signed) by the mainline partners? Doesn't that mean the mainline partner could take "ownership" instead of agreeing to pay Republic a higher rate? Especially when cheaper airlines could take on additional aircraft with their current staffing levels.

I am legit asking and not trying to say that is what is happening.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
GoHomeLeg is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:38 AM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Entirely untrue.

Almost always, mgmt either has fat golden parachutes or they get big bonuses following the restructure. Everyone else gets hosed.
I was referring to the regular employee's. Of course the thieves at the top get theirs at everyone elses expense. (AIG, Enron, even Horton at AA got paid 20 million for the privilege of being fired.) Pilots most definitely don't fall into their group.
RyanP is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:41 AM
  #236  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by FlameNSky
With exception of about 6 hulls, AAG is the guarantor on all the AE branded aircraft. Think of it as RAH using AAG's credit to secure financing. As such, Parker has provisions that allow AAG to take those aircraft if Bedford defaults. I don't know if AAG would take them and reassign them to another carrier but legally they could. ( I realize that it would have to be approved by the court but their is no judge in the world that would tell a creditor that they won't let someone else take over the negotiated lease rates and force them to take RAH's deal )
This is correct. Technically, the way it played out is that the BNDES (Brazilian National Development Bank) financed a large portion of the E175 purchase with Republic putting up their own money for the remaining balance.

The portion of the purchase financed by BNDES was co-signed by American Airlines with the stipulation that AA would take possession of the aircraft if Republic defaulted in any way. Bankruptcy is part of that clause, so it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Skyvector is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:44 AM
  #237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 200
Default

Since RAH technically owns the leases on AA's 47? E-175's, if unable to perform or staff can the leases and/or planes be transferred over to Envoy?
diva is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:44 AM
  #238  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by Flightcap
Per a memo sent by the COO to pilots today:

"We will honor both of our Labor agreements. We are not asking for any changes to them. We will not ask the court for permission to reject them."
Management doesn't decide whatever they want in bankruptcy. The creditor committee also has a huge say now and can reject managements plans. They want their money. So they will do whatever they see fit to try and maximize their claims. Whether that is going along with managements restructuring plan, exploring other plans, pushing for selling off assets, closing down areas of the business, changes of leadership, exploring merger opportunities etc..

Not to mention everything airline management says to employee's is a lie anyway. They will say anything to keep the employee's under control.

Last edited by RyanP; 02-26-2016 at 11:04 AM.
RyanP is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 11:06 AM
  #239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

Originally Posted by RyanP
Management doesn't decide whatever they want in bankruptcy. The creditor committee also has a say now.. and they want their money. They will do whatever they see fit.

Not to mention everything airline management says to employee's is a lie anyway. They will say anything..
That's true, in bankruptcy management loses much of their autonomy. The creditor committee's job is to eek every penny out of the corporate assets and return them to debt holders and shareholders.

The process is cruel.

In this case, if they site pilot shortage, then move to reject work rules and pay I wonder what effect that would have on recruitment and retention?
awax is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 11:15 AM
  #240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 787
Default

This is such a backwards bankruptcy. $100,000,000 in cash and trying restructure debt? Creditors committee is going to have fun with that one.

It's a shame BB has pulled the employees into this mess.
SmitteyB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tsuda
American
0
12-18-2011 06:10 PM
Elvis90
American
49
09-29-2011 10:24 AM
geshields
Major
0
09-14-2005 02:00 PM
Sir James
Major
0
09-06-2005 11:58 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
07-05-2005 03:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices