Forbes: Regional Airlines Shrinkage/Consolida
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 504
I don't mean to throw my service around. I don't need or want thanks. I was merely trying to tell him that, of all people, I understand freedom. I typically don't like when people drop the M bomb to win an argument. I was just providing prospective. And I agree with you.
#72
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 91
....and if they do, they can expect the passenger's lobby to become quite aggressive in highlighting the adoption of profit over safety. Now, that may or may not be effective, but what then happens when the next accident occurs in the regional industry with low time pilots in an error scenario ?
Congress would be barbequed and would likely be the coup-de-grace for regional carriers using low-time pilots.
Besides, all such a roll back would do would be to provide a temporary relief to the industry as the real problem ISN'T the higher experience minimums, it's the combination of excessive cost to obtain a crap job that pays like garbage and provides even worse treatment. People aren't interested in that anymore, when they can make much better $ in other industries and get treated 1000% better while doing it. It's going to get to the point in 6 or 7 years where even the legacies will have a pilot shortage as all the present regional pilots will not be accepted and the regionals will be just about dead at that point.
That's what ultimately happens when you turn a once respected and difficult to obtain profession into nothing more then that of "just another job". They've patted themselves on the back for the ability to decimate this profession and the chickens are coming home to roost.
Congress would be barbequed and would likely be the coup-de-grace for regional carriers using low-time pilots.
Besides, all such a roll back would do would be to provide a temporary relief to the industry as the real problem ISN'T the higher experience minimums, it's the combination of excessive cost to obtain a crap job that pays like garbage and provides even worse treatment. People aren't interested in that anymore, when they can make much better $ in other industries and get treated 1000% better while doing it. It's going to get to the point in 6 or 7 years where even the legacies will have a pilot shortage as all the present regional pilots will not be accepted and the regionals will be just about dead at that point.
That's what ultimately happens when you turn a once respected and difficult to obtain profession into nothing more then that of "just another job". They've patted themselves on the back for the ability to decimate this profession and the chickens are coming home to roost.
The reason I think congress will repeal it is because aviation travel is pretty much the new railroad industry. Cities grow and shrink due to the aviation business these days; and these small towns wants their piece of the pie.
#73
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
At least Breezy can explain his side logically. And without the name calling. Which seems to be a problem for you. Perhaps you should take a time out from the internets for a while and calm down, then come back and explain your viewpoint in a calm, reasonable manner. I assure you more people will be apt to at least consider your POV as compared to what you are doing currently.
Spoken like a true communist who has no God, no moral compass, and no understanding of the word "freedom".
Yes, you are an idiot of the highest magnitude.
No, you don't get to put words into my mouth and claim this is the argument I make.
The misunderstanding is your's, not mine.
What I said was that "the want of a long, healthy life is a desire, not a need."
Want a long, healthy life?
Earn it, just like everyone else.
The right to earn it (ie. "pursuit of") is guaranteed by the Constitution, nothing else.
Yes, you are an idiot of the highest magnitude.
No, you don't get to put words into my mouth and claim this is the argument I make.
The misunderstanding is your's, not mine.
What I said was that "the want of a long, healthy life is a desire, not a need."
Want a long, healthy life?
Earn it, just like everyone else.
The right to earn it (ie. "pursuit of") is guaranteed by the Constitution, nothing else.
I would try to explain it to you, Breezy, but you are:
1. clearly incapable of understanding it
...and, more importantly...
2. have a "mind" so filled with garbage that, even if you could understand it, it is impossible to get through all the garbage standing in the way
Just because you were in the military and "fought for it" doesn't mean you understand it. In point of fact, you clearly don't as I have amply demonstrated. Moreover, you don't even understand simple economics, which means you cannot possibly understand how regulation or deregulation affects economics, which means you cannot possibly understand the opinions you have. You just spew them out because someone somewhere told you that "unfettered capitalism" is wrong and blah blah blah.
You are a lemming, conditioned to spew what your betters ("people who have PhD's agree with me") have told you to say.
1. clearly incapable of understanding it
...and, more importantly...
2. have a "mind" so filled with garbage that, even if you could understand it, it is impossible to get through all the garbage standing in the way
Just because you were in the military and "fought for it" doesn't mean you understand it. In point of fact, you clearly don't as I have amply demonstrated. Moreover, you don't even understand simple economics, which means you cannot possibly understand how regulation or deregulation affects economics, which means you cannot possibly understand the opinions you have. You just spew them out because someone somewhere told you that "unfettered capitalism" is wrong and blah blah blah.
You are a lemming, conditioned to spew what your betters ("people who have PhD's agree with me") have told you to say.
#74
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
#75
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
I'm genuinely curious, do you think the majors will really see a shortage, more so in 6 to 7 years? the last time the majors saw a real shortage was in the 60's and that's because they wasn't real pilots around besides the military.
The reason I think congress will repeal it is because aviation travel is pretty much the new railroad industry. Cities grow and shrink due to the aviation business these days; and these small towns wants their piece of the pie.
The reason I think congress will repeal it is because aviation travel is pretty much the new railroad industry. Cities grow and shrink due to the aviation business these days; and these small towns wants their piece of the pie.
Congress doesn't have to do anything for the FAA to modify the 1500 hour rule. The FAA could make a rule that ATPs can be issued at 500 hours if they want.
https://www.faa.gov/news/press_relea...m?newsId=14838
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
LOL
Geez, Breezy, you sure do have a lot of sock puppets. Insecure, much? Funny how they all point to your non-existent "logic".
Meanwhile, we all know I'm only the latest in a long line of folks who have called you out for your idiocies.
And playing on your service to generate sympathy is weak indeed. Real warriors never do that. Liberals? I know of many who say they have served but never did. Just more sock puppetry on your part? Who cares.
Geez, Breezy, you sure do have a lot of sock puppets. Insecure, much? Funny how they all point to your non-existent "logic".
Meanwhile, we all know I'm only the latest in a long line of folks who have called you out for your idiocies.
And playing on your service to generate sympathy is weak indeed. Real warriors never do that. Liberals? I know of many who say they have served but never did. Just more sock puppetry on your part? Who cares.
#77
LOL
Geez, Breezy, you sure do have a lot of sock puppets. Insecure, much? Funny how they all point to your non-existent "logic".
Meanwhile, we all know I'm only the latest in a long line of folks who have called you out for your idiocies.
And playing on your service to generate sympathy is weak indeed. Real warriors never do that. Liberals? I know of many who say they have served but never did. Just more sock puppetry on your part? Who cares.
Geez, Breezy, you sure do have a lot of sock puppets. Insecure, much? Funny how they all point to your non-existent "logic".
Meanwhile, we all know I'm only the latest in a long line of folks who have called you out for your idiocies.
And playing on your service to generate sympathy is weak indeed. Real warriors never do that. Liberals? I know of many who say they have served but never did. Just more sock puppetry on your part? Who cares.
I think that sums you up quite nicely
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Typical liberal comment. You think you're the only one who lost friends (or family, in my case) over there? Be my guest.
Btw, it obvious YOU "believed it to be a pursuit of cheap oil"...regurgitating what you've been told to say, once again.
Do you ever have a original thought of your own? Don't bother answering that.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Hey Breezy, how many sock puppets do you have? LOL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post