Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues >

UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2016, 07:20 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,706
Default

Originally Posted by timeless
Thank you. That is what I was looking for. I guess that means the person traveling will have to take the screenshots and I can make sure any misuse is corrected. How many vacation passes do they get each year?
8 I believe is the number...
ugleeual is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 06:38 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual
8 I believe is the number...
Eight is correct. Each pass is good for one-way travel and includes all riders traveling together in a group. They also have the benefit of waiving the service charge for upgrading to Business or First.

The system has issues, even on mainline flights, as the typical result of someone using an SA0V is that all other SA1P riders upgrade to vacation passes so the boarding priority is unchanged but everyone's burned a vacation pass. The biggest benefit, IMO, is the service charge waived upgrades.

Might work better if the SA0V priority went by check-in time, instead of seniority, as that would get rid of the gamesmanship but that won't happen.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 07:09 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC
We are mainlines *****es, unwanted step childs, the bastards if you will... And as you can see, the mainline pilots get all ****y when you try to stand up for yourself. This is not only a "B" or even "C" pay scale for doing the same exact job, it is a "caste" system like in India. We are sub human to mainline.
There is nothing we can really do other than walk away from it.
I bet you may pay check you don't even know what a B scale is.

If you want to be treated better then stop voting in substandard contracts. Mainline has nothing to do with how much you are paid or your quality of life or your boarding priority while on passes. And the mainline pilots certainly don't have any say in any of it so give it a rest and take the issues up with your Union and your company.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 10:19 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
I bet you may pay check you don't even know what a B scale is.

If you want to be treated better then stop voting in substandard contracts. Mainline has nothing to do with how much you are paid or your quality of life or your boarding priority while on passes. And the mainline pilots certainly don't have any say in any of it so give it a rest and take the issues up with your Union and your company.
LOL yes you do. YOUR contract allows the flying to be outsourced. If you want to grow a pair, then go on strike to stop the outsourcing of mainline flying. We are all trying to survive in an atmosphere that was created by mainline pilots deciding they had more important issues other than allowing their flying to be outsourced. Until the mainline pilots take the stand that if there is a Tulip (or globe or whatever the hell they have on the planes now) on the tail, then the pilots belong on the UAL list, then we will all continue to suffer. The mainline pilots have to tools in their hands to stop this, it just isn't worth the pain they might suffer for them to stop it.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 10:26 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,534
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
LOL yes you do. YOUR contract allows the flying to be outsourced. If you want to grow a pair, then go on strike to stop the outsourcing of mainline flying. We are all trying to survive in an atmosphere that was created by mainline pilots deciding they had more important issues other than allowing their flying to be outsourced. Until the mainline pilots take the stand that if there is a Tulip (or globe or whatever the hell they have on the planes now) on the tail, then the pilots belong on the UAL list, then we will all continue to suffer. The mainline pilots have to tools in their hands to stop this, it just isn't worth the pain they might suffer for them to stop it.
Mark my words. You will never see a strike by a major carrier again. It'll go to a Presidential Emergency Board and Congress will impose a contract. Then we are all screwed.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 02:14 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Mark my words. You will never see a strike by a major carrier again. It'll go to a Presidential Emergency Board and Congress will impose a contract. Then we are all screwed.
The last major strike at Northwest was settled after a threat of a PEB by Clinton. Bush, however, let the Comair guys stay out until they came to a negotiated settlement.

However since the government allowed the last round of mergers (with ALPA cheering them along) these companies are officially too big to fail which means PEBs are much more likely. But as I said, if mainline pilots want this fixed, they can fix it but it just isn't a priority for them.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:04 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
LOL yes you do. YOUR contract allows the flying to be outsourced. If you want to grow a pair, then go on strike to stop the outsourcing of mainline flying. We are all trying to survive in an atmosphere that was created by mainline pilots deciding they had more important issues other than allowing their flying to be outsourced. Until the mainline pilots take the stand that if there is a Tulip (or globe or whatever the hell they have on the planes now) on the tail, then the pilots belong on the UAL list, then we will all continue to suffer. The mainline pilots have to tools in their hands to stop this, it just isn't worth the pain they might suffer for them to stop it.
Seems you have your blame game all lined up. It's the UA pilots fault that we get 8 vacation passes a year. It's the UA pilots fault your are flying an RJ. Glad to see it is only the UA pilots you blame for this.

Of course you make no mention of the scope constraints we achieved in the last contract. Nor do you mention the history of how UAX jets came to be at United, the last of the majors to allow RJ's by the way. DL, CO and AA all had 50 seat RJ's before they were allowed at UA. I suspect you were probably not in the industry in 90's when they were allowed to fly as UAX.

Finally were you conscripted into the position of regional jet pilot? The industry has been this way for some time so were the rules changed after you arrived or did you just not do any due diligence on the system? Whatever you do, don't accept any of the responsibility for being where you are today. Unless you were forced to be an RJ pilot you had the option to say NO and you have the current option to walk away. You have options, the ball is in your own personal court.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:12 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,534
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Seems you have your blame game all lined up. It's the UA pilots fault that we get 8 vacation passes a year. It's the UA pilots fault your are flying an RJ. Glad to see it is only the UA pilots you blame for this.

Of course you make no mention of the scope constraints we achieved in the last contract. Nor do you mention the history of how UAX jets came to be at United, the last of the majors to allow RJ's by the way. DL, CO and AA all had 50 seat RJ's before they were allowed at UA. I suspect you were probably not in the industry in 90's when they were allowed to fly as UAX.

Finally were you conscripted into the position of regional jet pilot? The industry has been this way for some time so were the rules changed after you arrived or did you just not do any due diligence on the system? Whatever you do, don't accept any of the responsibility for being where you are today. Unless you were forced to be an RJ pilot you had the option to say NO and you have the current option to walk away. You have options, the ball is in your own personal court.
You're right. I had the option of being a pilot and not being a pilot.

You helped write the rules of this game. Anyone who voted yes to scope relief is partially responsible. You don't get to sit up in your ivory tower and blame everyone else who came after you for playing by the rules of the game you created. I mean, I guess you can do whatever you want, it just makes you look like a greedy Richard.

If there was any other way to make a living post-CFI knowing there was a reasonably similar chance of making it to a major, I'd love to know what you think it is.

Last edited by CBreezy; 01-04-2016 at 08:23 AM.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:18 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Seems you have your blame game all lined up. It's the UA pilots fault that we get 8 vacation passes a year. It's the UA pilots fault your are flying an RJ. Glad to see it is only the UA pilots you blame for this.

Of course you make no mention of the scope constraints we achieved in the last contract. Nor do you mention the history of how UAX jets came to be at United, the last of the majors to allow RJ's by the way. DL, CO and AA all had 50 seat RJ's before they were allowed at UA. I suspect you were probably not in the industry in 90's when they were allowed to fly as UAX.

Finally were you conscripted into the position of regional jet pilot? The industry has been this way for some time so were the rules changed after you arrived or did you just not do any due diligence on the system? Whatever you do, don't accept any of the responsibility for being where you are today. Unless you were forced to be an RJ pilot you had the option to say NO and you have the current option to walk away. You have options, the ball is in your own personal court.
While you're right, are you really just hear to preach at us? I don't go over to the UA forum to tell you guys to STHU, why are you doing it here?
xjtgrunt is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 10:01 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Seems you have your blame game all lined up. It's the UA pilots fault that we get 8 vacation passes a year. It's the UA pilots fault your are flying an RJ. Glad to see it is only the UA pilots you blame for this.

Of course you make no mention of the scope constraints we achieved in the last contract. Nor do you mention the history of how UAX jets came to be at United, the last of the majors to allow RJ's by the way. DL, CO and AA all had 50 seat RJ's before they were allowed at UA. I suspect you were probably not in the industry in 90's when they were allowed to fly as UAX.

Finally were you conscripted into the position of regional jet pilot? The industry has been this way for some time so were the rules changed after you arrived or did you just not do any due diligence on the system? Whatever you do, don't accept any of the responsibility for being where you are today. Unless you were forced to be an RJ pilot you had the option to say NO and you have the current option to walk away. You have options, the ball is in your own personal court.
Actually I was in the industry before the fee for departure days so save the lecture. The fact is these regional airlines ceased to be airlines long ago. I wasn't conscripted for anything. The point is if UAL pilots wanted, we could all be on the same list for jumpseating, furloughs, nonreving, etc. Its because you allowed your flying to be outsourced we have this mess. It is in UAL pilots hands to fix this if they want, not regional pilots. We can only play with the hand we are dealt until we move on to better things. If mainline pilots want to work with regional pilots at UAL so we are all on one list and can jumpseat and nonrev based on that seniority across the system then we can all work together to achieve that and it will be better for all. But mainline guys will have to take the lead because they have the power. If mainline wants to continue the present arrangement where we are all in it for ourselves and screw the other guy, then when you're on my metal its my rules, then deal with it when I decide to play by my rules. All this stuff works both ways.
FlyingKat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
69boeing
Cargo
14
08-15-2007 10:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices