Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues >

UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UAL Vacation Pass -own metal issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2015, 08:33 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I'm kinda curious how you guys would go over the gate agent's head and apply your "own boarding priority" if you were presented with the situation? Serious question.
You bring up a good point.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 08:33 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,227
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC
It wouldn't be pretty, probably involve refusing to leave until so and so was on the flight, and who ever else was removed. Something I never would want to actually try.
Your OM probably says explicitly when a PIC is allowed to delay a flight. My guess is 'applying non rev priority' isn't a bullet item listed. You're looking at some unpaid time off, and it's doubtful the agent will change the order of boarding. Their job is on the line if they do that. This is all fairy tale talk, I don't think the OP has the balls to even try it.
Name User is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 08:40 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC
It wouldn't be pretty, probably involve refusing to leave until so and so was on the flight, and who ever else was removed. Something I never would want to actually try.
Then I sincerely hope you have a concrete leg to stand on to go outside of published policy besides just your version of what's fair. Because you're right: it will NOT be pretty.
freezingflyboy is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 09:13 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Then I sincerely hope you have a concrete leg to stand on to go outside of published policy besides just your version of what's fair. Because you're right: it will NOT be pretty.
Yep you are right. I'd call my chief pilot first and tell him the situation so at least the flight attendant would have someone on her side as to why she didn't get to work. Like I said though, I fly on the American side of things, and American lets our own people have priority. I suppose I was venting my anger about it, but my bottom line is that I need to protect my income source for my families sake.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 09:49 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
If you show up for a UA Jumpseat and were denied for another legacy carrier pilot I suspect you and the other posters creating their own boarding system for nonrevs would cry foul and create a scene. You would be the higher priority and yet you were denied boarding. Hightly suspect you wouldn't go quietly. However, when you decide to start creating policy you have no issue with stepping outside of the system. It is logic and thinking like this as to why you are still flying an RJ in the largest hiring spree since 9/11.

Vacation passes are a limited quantity. They compete on seniority across all vacation pass holders. If the express person is senior then they would go first.

I really wouldn't get so spun up about this issue. You will most likely be replaced in 4-5 years when UA rebids the express contract and the next lowest bidder steps up to the plate. You get replaced the new company gets your planes and you get to start over again. That does throw a wrench into you getting senior to compete for a vacation pass though......

If you don't like the UA boarding priority system take it up with your company. Don't screw the people that are only using the system. That is really childish and speaks of a very insecure person with a RJ for life career path.
Express employees don't get vacation passes. It's completely ridiculous that a United gate agent can bump a pilot off their own metal, but yes that IS the way it works.
Crazy Canuck is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 10:36 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck
Express employees don't get vacation passes. It's completely ridiculous that a United gate agent can bump a pilot off their own metal, but yes that IS the way it works.
My apologies. I meant that when the UA person uses a vacation pass they are now competing at seniority base with the express employee.

United or the mainline carrier own every seat on that plane. The express carriers have no system to sell seats. If you guys want to start your own flying under your own name then you can dictate how the system works. The industry is riddled with carriers that tried and failed but it's always an option.
Lambourne is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 10:58 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,534
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Back when AWAC was under US Airways, employees had to pay $240/year for the full travel benefit package. Guys went nuts over this as Republic, SkyWest, etc never had to pay. Well, come to find out those carriers didn't get near the off airline benefits that AWAC did (like Grand Canyon helicopter tours for $35). So yes, I would say it is a 'thing', as I've experienced it first hand.
Define "not as good." And leave out Grand Canyon tours. I'm talking purely about boarding priority and privileges on the codeshare partner only AND how carriers have cut them to undercut another carrier.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 11:19 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,285
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne

United or the mainline carrier own every seat on that plane.
Well thats not true, you need to read up on the agreements and contracts, they are not all the same CPA's as you describe.

Irregardless this argument is pointless. The vacation pass for mainline was an end run around the express carries after the contract negotiations ended, it's done.
Express got ride of the annual fee and buddy pass in exchange for free economy and segment fee in first class, all aircraft, regardless of owner.
There is nothing a crew can or should do other then watch out for the abusers that are all to common, I.E. changing to SAOV inside of one hour.
trip is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 11:38 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Default

Deleted...
Waitingformins is offline  
Old 12-28-2015, 01:32 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by trip
Well thats not true, you need to read up on the agreements and contracts, they are not all the same CPA's as you describe.

Irregardless this argument is pointless. The vacation pass for mainline was an end run around the express carries after the contract negotiations ended, it's done.
Vacation passes were not created as an end run for express travel. It was part of the L-CO benefits and we were polled after the merger and it was adopted when crafting the merged policy.

Where do I go to buy a ticket from Mesa or Trans States. I heard Skywest did some at risk E120 flying previously. For the bread and butter of the express carriers, the major owns 100% of the seats.
Lambourne is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
Airhoss
United
210
09-04-2012 06:48 AM
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
69boeing
Cargo
14
08-15-2007 10:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices