Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
United adds 10 new E175 to the fleet >

United adds 10 new E175 to the fleet

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

United adds 10 new E175 to the fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2015, 09:39 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
I just can't fathom why Delta and United would just sit back and watch their largest and very reliable regional airline die from attrition while handing more and more aircraft and passenger responsibility to Mesa (which AA owns 10% stake of) and GoJet (not sorry, you know why). It just goes beyond comprehension.
Doesn't matter what mainline wants, Inc is saying they cost too much and they have been losing money for forever. Xjt says its incs fault, I don't believe it they lost money before Skywest bought them and the contracts with the pilots in particular are not sustainable in the regional market as it stands today. Inc has for all intents and purposes given up on the "renegotiate with mainline" policy because mainline isn't playing ball.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 09:46 AM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
I just can't fathom why Delta and United would just sit back and watch their largest and very reliable regional airline die from attrition while handing more and more aircraft and passenger responsibility to Mesa (which AA owns 10% stake of) and GoJet (not sorry, you know why). It just goes beyond comprehension.
Maybe because other regionals will do it for significantly cheaper.

Also, maybe they don't care about performance as much as you/we think.
dickmaster3000 is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 01:29 PM
  #33  
CA
 
CL65driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: I am the Captain now...
Posts: 1,006
Default

$20 says it's not XJT- it never is.
CL65driver is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 01:53 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
Maybe with UA buying these 10 aircraft, Inc. gets the rate they want for XJT to fly them and UA gets the shorter length term. You see, I'm actually pulling for you guys to get your foot in the door. Not always chugging that Kool-Aid.

But anyways, just because UA bought them, doesn't automatically mean these are destined for Mesa. They could be going to TSA or Compass just as easily.
Actually it doesn't say United is necessarily buying the aircraft, it said "we, or one of our partners will convert to firm orders"...Skywest is the only company to my knowledge that has firm orders and are also a united express partner.


Here it is:
"We announced we will add 10 Embraer E175 aircraft to the United Express fleet, offering more customers greater comfort and convenience during their inflight experience. We, or one of our express partners, expect to convert 18 more E175 aircraft to firm orders in the near term.

We anticipate deliveries of the aircraft will begin next year and continue through the summer of 2017. The new aircraft will replace older, less-efficient 50-seat regional jets and are in addition to the 125 E175s whose deliveries began in 2014.

"Our customers tell us that they are thrilled with these modern, fuel-efficient aircraft," said Fleet VP Ron Baur. "The E175s are a great addition to the regional fleet and further align the United Express inflight experience with our mainline service."

The E175s will offer 12 seats in United First and 64 seats in United Economy, including 16 extra-legroom United Economy Plus seats. The aircraft also offer more personal space for customers, with wider seats and aisles than other regional aircraft; a power outlet at each United First seat; and large overhead bins that can accommodate standard-size carry-on bags.
Squallrider is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 02:16 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
Maybe with UA buying these 10 aircraft, Inc. gets the rate they want for XJT to fly them and UA gets the shorter length term. You see, I'm actually pulling for you guys to get your foot in the door. Not always chugging that Kool-Aid.

But anyways, just because UA bought them, doesn't automatically mean these are destined for Mesa. They could be going to TSA or Compass just as easily.
Adding a new type to a fleet is really expensive. I foresee these 10 aircraft going to an operator that already has E175s (Mesa, Skywest, Republic/Shuttle but they can't staff it, Compass)
zondaracer is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 02:51 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
clearprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Right Seat Spouse
Posts: 452
Default

$20.00 on Inc.
clearprop is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 04:48 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default United adds 10 new E175 to the fleet

Originally Posted by NVUS
Maybe with UA buying these 10 aircraft, Inc. gets the rate they want for XJT to fly them and UA gets the shorter length term. You see, I'm actually pulling for you guys to get your foot in the door. Not always chugging that Kool-Aid.

But anyways, just because UA bought them, doesn't automatically mean these are destined for Mesa. They could be going to TSA or Compass just as easily.
Theoretically possible. Must be some left over kool aid or something.



Originally Posted by Squallrider
They would need a lot more than 10 planes to justify starting a program etc etc. I don't see xjt getting 175s, why wouldn't inc not just give it to Skywest since we have the program etc and the sims

Unless the other 18 are also destined to a regional that doesn't already have a 175.

Originally Posted by Squallrider
Doesn't matter what mainline wants, Inc is saying they cost too much and they have been losing money for forever. Xjt says its incs fault, I don't believe it they lost money before Skywest bought them and the contracts with the pilots in particular are not sustainable in the regional market as it stands today. Inc has for all intents and purposes given up on the "renegotiate with mainline" policy because mainline isn't playing ball.
And management wrote a memo last week saying they will deliver a contract proposal with better pay and work rules for everyone. So I guess it's going to be max pay to the end!

By the way, the cal CPA did make money until inc whipsawed Skywest pilots agains xjt. After that, the Skywest negotiated CPA that xjt got stuck with has lost money thanks to their superior strategic planning.



Originally Posted by Squallrider
Actually it doesn't say United is necessarily buying the aircraft, it said "we, or one of our partners will convert to firm orders"...Skywest is the only company to my knowledge that has firm orders and are also a united express partner.





Here it is:

"We announced we will add 10 Embraer E175 aircraft to the United Express fleet, offering more customers greater comfort and convenience during their inflight experience. We, or one of our express partners, expect to convert 18 more E175 aircraft to firm orders in the near term.



We anticipate deliveries of the aircraft will begin next year and continue through the summer of 2017. The new aircraft will replace older, less-efficient 50-seat regional jets and are in addition to the 125 E175s whose deliveries began in 2014.



"Our customers tell us that they are thrilled with these modern, fuel-efficient aircraft," said Fleet VP Ron Baur. "The E175s are a great addition to the regional fleet and further align the United Express inflight experience with our mainline service."



The E175s will offer 12 seats in United First and 64 seats in United Economy, including 16 extra-legroom United Economy Plus seats. The aircraft also offer more personal space for customers, with wider seats and aisles than other regional aircraft; a power outlet at each United First seat; and large overhead bins that can accommodate standard-size carry-on bags.

Hmmm, I guess I read that to mean that UAL (pretty sure that also had options) converted 10 of their options to firm orders with a possibility of them or someone else (Skywest) converting 18 of their options as well. Time will tell.
Nevets is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 05:03 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 203
Default

I've got $10 on xjt.... New push by management to get a contract done.
Whatmeworry is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 05:05 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,239
Default

Originally Posted by Whatmeworry
I've got $10 on xjt.... New push by management to get a contract done.
I would bet against that.. The cost of anding a new type is not in XJT's future...
amcnd is offline  
Old 06-18-2015, 07:23 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
I would bet against that.. The cost of anding a new type is not in XJT's future...

Probably doesn't make much difference but supposedly management has said that everything is done that can be done without actually having an aircraft on property. Not sure if that is true or not. But I'm sure they can just cut and paste everything from the Skywest side of not. I wouldn't bet on xjt either.
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
LAX Pilot
United
66
09-03-2013 09:57 PM
Two-percent
Major
73
12-19-2012 05:35 PM
Nicless
Major
66
06-11-2008 02:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices