Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Insight at RAH/S5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2015, 02:46 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
Default

Originally Posted by ThreeStripe
The gentleman from XJT is correct sir. The E170 program has been completed for some time now to the point of needing the actual plane to continue. Not every regional operates like bedford's big top circus. Some think ahead.
Lol. Uh ok. Whatever you say. Then you should be getting them any day, right? So you even have Sim time blocked and ready to go, huh? CKA all ready (even with zero time in the plane)? Please. XJT at the bare minimums are mid 2016 before you'd be ready for it. You're being lied to in order to get suckers to stay there.
TillerEnvy is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 02:59 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 362
Default

Originally Posted by TillerEnvy
Lol. Uh ok. Whatever you say. Then you should be getting them any day, right?
Whenever republic loses their contract...Take the blinders off your eyes my friend, S5 has worse CCF than C5....they are canceling flights left and right for NO CREWS. There is NOTHING to attract pilots (no cancelation pay, no dead head pay, terrible benefits) and you're saying that Shuttle and RAH will be able to staff MORE airplanes...writing is on the wall. not saying the flying will go to XJT but its better staffed than S5 and ready to go. I dont know why you have a hard on to say that it couldn't possibly happen.
tothebigblue is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 03:40 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 113
Default

Am I missing something? Doesn't RAH own their own airplanes? Even if the contract was terminated the other airline that received the flying would have to order planes since the airframes are owned by RAH.
CFIGUY22 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 03:43 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Emb 170/175 FO
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by tothebigblue
Whenever republic loses their contract...Take the blinders off your eyes my friend, S5 has worse CCF than C5....they are canceling flights left and right for NO CREWS. There is NOTHING to attract pilots (no cancelation pay, no dead head pay, terrible benefits) and you're saying that Shuttle and RAH will be able to staff MORE airplanes...writing is on the wall. not saying the flying will go to XJT but its better staffed than S5 and ready to go. I dont know why you have a hard on to say that it couldn't possibly happen.
Question 1. If somehow you all are able to instantly jump start a new 175 program, where are you getting 50 of them from in time to make a difference? Because as previously stated, our 50 are owned by RAH, not united. I doubt they would be for sale.

Question 2. Why are you so hellbent on RAH losing our contract and picking up our flying? I believe the only two regionals left that said no to garbage contracts are expressjet and.... wait for it... Republic. We are very close to a new TA, which will have to be good, or this pilot group will say no, again. Might that be a good thing for you and the rest of the industry if we are able to raise the bar??
TurbineTime is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 03:44 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Default

Originally Posted by CFIGUY22
Am I missing something? Doesn't RAH own their own airplanes? Even if the contract was terminated the other airline that received the flying would have to order planes since the airframes are owned by RAH.
So RAH will just let airplanes sit in the desert, "in spite".
PilotCrusader is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 03:50 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
So RAH will just let airplanes sit in the desert, "in spite".
No they could exercise some options with another one of the 3 carriers they use to buy them time. Just a theory.
CFIGUY22 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 04:08 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Drofdeb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime
Question 1. If somehow you all are able to instantly jump start a new 175 program, where are you getting 50 of them from in time to make a difference? Because as previously stated, our 50 are owned by RAH, not united. I doubt they would be for sale.

Question 2. Why are you so hellbent on RAH losing our contract and picking up our flying? I believe the only two regionals left that said no to garbage contracts are expressjet and.... wait for it... Republic. We are very close to a new TA, which will have to be good, or this pilot group will say no, again. Might that be a good thing for you and the rest of the industry if we are able to raise the bar??
That's how a lot of pilots think. Its either:

As long as I got mine, I do not give a rodent's behind about you.
or Oh my, he's got it good, how do I bring him down to my level. Lots of crab mentality.
or If I post misleading info on APC, I will lure more suckers to join my airline, thus enhancing my own position. Pass the koolaid.

There is a lot of chaff to sift through, to get to the grains.

Its the newbies who pay the price. They will rue the day they made their decisions based on all the self-serving info posted here.
Drofdeb is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 04:33 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
So minus 30 Dash-8s, add 50 175s for United, 9 more for (Delta?), plus maintaining current 145 compliment?
You're off by a few Q400s, but RAH is also parking their 5 E-190s currently used for charters, so the total is pretty much correct.


Originally Posted by CFIGUY22
Am I missing something? Doesn't RAH own their own airplanes? Even if the contract was terminated the other airline that received the flying would have to order planes since the airframes are owned by RAH.
They own most of their airplanes, including all of the 50 going to the new UAL Shuttle Republic flying. But UAL holds a bunch of options on E-175s, so if UAL wanted to give E175 flying to another carrier, they would just exercise those options. That was how SkyWest and Mesa got their 175s. Not sure what DAL would do.
morerightrudder is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 04:47 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime
Question 1. If somehow you all are able to instantly jump start a new 175 program, where are you getting 50 of them from in time to make a difference? Because as previously stated, our 50 are owned by RAH, not united. I doubt they would be for sale.

Question 2. Why are you so hellbent on RAH losing our contract and picking up our flying? I believe the only two regionals left that said no to garbage contracts are expressjet and.... wait for it... Republic. We are very close to a new TA, which will have to be good, or this pilot group will say no, again. Might that be a good thing for you and the rest of the industry if we are able to raise the bar??
skywest Inc. does have those 53 delivery slots still locked up, just saying
spaaks is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 04:47 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by CFIGUY22
Am I missing something? Doesn't RAH own their own airplanes? Even if the contract was terminated the other airline that received the flying would have to order planes since the airframes are owned by RAH.
The logical thing for RAH to do with them is to lease them to bring in some revenue for the shareholders. Crazy to think that he would lease the planes to the company they lost the flying to, but he is responsible to the shareholders and no one else. He will do what they tell him to do, even if it means turning RAH into a leasing company.
ThreeStripe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlackhawkIP
Military
15
10-16-2014 07:48 AM
2StgTurbine
Foreign
13
05-20-2014 06:02 AM
AviatorBoeing
Charter
9
10-20-2011 09:57 AM
west
Flight Schools and Training
5
11-19-2009 05:14 AM
JetJock16
Regional
29
04-20-2007 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices