Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ALPA's buyout/merger policy >

ALPA's buyout/merger policy

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ALPA's buyout/merger policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2014, 08:55 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default ALPA's buyout/merger policy

Lets say Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Richard Branson decide to start up a new mainline operation. Their pilots also join ALPA. Many of the pilots that got hired at the new carrier were good but didn't get a CJO from DAL when they applied to DAL but were able to get on at the new company. The new company has many less experiences pilots compared to most regionals. Now due to competition DAL decides to buyout or merge the new company and it happens. The new company was operating similar gage equipment to DAL and therefore the mccaskill bond amendment applies I think and like NWA just merge seniority list after an agreement is reached. Nobody needs to take any test or be reinterviewed . Am I correct in this assumption?
jethikoki is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:00 AM
  #2  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

New game:
How many outrageously far fetched what-ifs can you come up with in a single paragraph. GO!
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:01 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,560
Default

I priest, a nun and a donkey walk into a bar...
CBreezy is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:20 AM
  #4  
PermaFO
 
CanoeBum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: May I swing the gear Von Admiral?
Posts: 130
Default

I don't know, but if you ask real nice DL might give you a $30k bonus. You'll have to pass their bend over flexibility exam first though...
CanoeBum is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:21 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Default

I think what you're telling us is that you haven't actually read the ALPA merger policy. Google my friend, Google. Not only will you find the policy, but there are college professors writing papers on it and offering mathematical models on how to accomplish a merge that's "fair and equitable".

I haven't seen any scenarios like the one you offer, so if that one is really important, then, I dunno.
awax is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:24 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

Yes.

In short mergers between carriers where both pilot groups are alpa get much more simple then compared to alpa and apa or usapa.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 09:30 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Thanks for your well thought out replies gentleman and sorry to offend those with far superior English intellect. Just wondering why we have to accept the antiquated "Jim Crow laws" when a mainline buys a regional if my above example is correct.
jethikoki is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 11:02 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Similar gage equipment has no bearing on the McCaskill bond law. But in your scenario, it wouldn't apply anyway because both pilot groups are represented by the same Union. ALPA merger policy would apply.
Nevets is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 11:11 AM
  #9  
PermaFO
 
CanoeBum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: May I swing the gear Von Admiral?
Posts: 130
Default

Are you asking, in a round about way, why 9L hasn't been merged into the DL list?
CanoeBum is offline  
Old 11-23-2014, 11:13 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by jethikoki
Lets say Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Richard Branson decide to start up a new mainline operation. Their pilots also join ALPA. Many of the pilots that got hired at the new carrier were good but didn't get a CJO from DAL when they applied to DAL but were able to get on at the new company. The new company has many less experiences pilots compared to most regionals. Now due to competition DAL decides to buyout or merge the new company and it happens. The new company was operating similar gage equipment to DAL and therefore the mccaskill bond amendment applies I think and like NWA just merge seniority list after an agreement is reached. Nobody needs to take any test or be reinterviewed . Am I correct in this assumption?
Loganville Holdings.

No relative integration for you. Come back, 30 years!
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM
RockBottom
Major
42
06-14-2006 10:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices