TSA Yep
11-10-2014, 01:10 PM
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Skywest doesn't want them because they lose money under the CPA they negotiated when they attempted to buy xjt. And when they did buy xjt two years later, they renegotiated the CPA again but still agreed to a money losing CPA.
11-10-2014, 01:22 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,239
If you listened to the SKW call they talked about "mitigating" losses.. Working with UA to place thsr planes at TSA is part of that.. Win for SKW. Win for UA. Win for TSA if they can make money...
11-10-2014, 01:35 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,239
Yes i agree. But dont think management is looking out for the peeps right now. They are worried about the company.. Sad. But the ERJ side looks to shring down to what?? Maybe they can negotiate a far contract with UA for 30-100 planes is my guess..
11-10-2014, 01:36 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,934
Yahoo finance article says nothing of parking airplanes says going from 29 to 65. Where did the replacement info come from?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trans-...160000262.html
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trans-...160000262.html
11-10-2014, 01:44 PM
#27
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Not going to furlough...yet.
The ERJ side will be lucky to be a 100 aircraft company. They are not worried about the peeps, at least not the ones you are referring to. They need to keep relationships good at UAL. Those are the peeps they are looking out for, other than themselves of course.
11-10-2014, 05:17 PM
#29
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 82
Good to see the whinerski guys get some growth
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
