These CEOs may have a point
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Captain - Retired
Posts: 265
The problem is not the airplanes either. The seat mile costs of 50 to 100 seat airliners is workable for the segments they are designed for, just like with a Boeing or Airbus, even at a reasonable pay scale for the pilots.
I can empathize with people who have been at the commuters for 15-20 years why they would want to stay there. I understand it. But it's their own fault they are there. They've missed at LEAST 3 huge hiring cycles at the majors and decided to stay put for whatever reason. At my commuter, if you look at the seniority list, you'd see years 1-8 or so then a gap to years 12-15 or so. All the mid level people punched out.
I think it's disgusting to assume they "missed the boat" as if they are somehow condemned to a substandard job and professionally inferior to their mainline colleagues. I understand it's not you personally condemning them but it's a common theme that seems to be accepted by "regional" pilots.
#42
This thread is going in circles. The seniority system in the airline industry is here to stay. If you don't like it, if you're too
much of a "rugged individualist," leave us mediocre socialists behind and pursue your dream job as a free agent in the corporate world. (Overseas is good too, I hear: No seniority or unions to impede your career aspirations.)
#44
Political, social issue?!? "Propaganda"?
You do realize AOPA is geared toward aircraft owners and pilots (hence the name) and not toward professional aviators, right?
I'm genuinely interested in how you think AOPA and WIA are point people at pursuing 121 aviation as a career goal.
If you had said "Flying Magazine", I'd have bought what you were selling. But AOPA and WIA? I don't get it.
And blaming those entities absolves people of personal responsibility for their lack of due diligence on the industry and career path...
You do realize AOPA is geared toward aircraft owners and pilots (hence the name) and not toward professional aviators, right?
I'm genuinely interested in how you think AOPA and WIA are point people at pursuing 121 aviation as a career goal.
If you had said "Flying Magazine", I'd have bought what you were selling. But AOPA and WIA? I don't get it.
And blaming those entities absolves people of personal responsibility for their lack of due diligence on the industry and career path...
I know you know what I mean. Don't play coy with me.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Of course I would and I will in 30 years. Unfortunately people see that top top big airplane pay and justify decades of substandard pay to get there. And it's stupid to pay like that. It's the very definition of the "rich" taking from the poor.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
That's not a fair statement. You don't own your own brand at the majors either...You're still operating under a parent company umbrella. Besides, pilots are just professionals performing a specific job which doesn't include marketing. The job the regional pilots perform is exactly the same as the job the major pilots perform, but for less pay.
This is also kind of unfair. People stay at regional for a wide variety of very good reasons. Maybe they are settled into their domicile with a new family and don't want to take the risk and pay cut while commuting to a far away base just to fly a bigger plane. It may be many years before they reach pay equity as well. Maybe they have other personal reasons. Maybe they have a side business that makes more money and they can't risk it by moving.
I think it's disgusting to assume they "missed the boat" as if they are somehow condemned to a substandard job and professionally inferior to their mainline colleagues. I understand it's not you personally condemning them but it's a common theme that seems to be accepted by "regional" pilots.
#47
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
YOU accepted the crappy regional pay viewing it as a stepping stone to something better. If YOU and everyone like YOU refused to work for that pay, the pay would rise.
Supply and demand. Adam Smith knew that in the 18th Century. I guess you were sick that day when they covered it in 7th grade Social Studies.
Of course I would and I will in 30 years....It's the very definition of the "rich" taking from the poor.
#48
Does Market Value = Merit System
9G,
You sound more like a labor relations type working for the RAA trying to stir the pot against unions.
Who determines a "quality" pilot for hire and upgrade? The Chief Pilot? HR? Some subjective test?
I don't want to watch (Insert special hire, Mgt Kid, whatever) upgrade because they are obviously "better" pilots (because they are special hire, Mgt Kid, etc) than every other F/O! Especially if they are only a year or two into this career.
RJ pilots are pilots. Some/many will interview for Majors/Legacy and will be as qualified as other applicants. I would rather hope for the equipment currently flown by regional airlines be flown by the mainline and hire pilots! But this would mean Mgt would have to pay them more! Which is the real reason regional airlines exist. To pay less! Not because RJ pilots are not qualified, but because they can pay them less and whipsaw them. I hope RJ pilots demand and get better pay and work to prevent the wipsaw so it become better for Mgt to move equipment to mainline. Not sure if that is doable, but a nice idea.
You sound more like a labor relations type working for the RAA trying to stir the pot against unions.
Who determines a "quality" pilot for hire and upgrade? The Chief Pilot? HR? Some subjective test?
I don't want to watch (Insert special hire, Mgt Kid, whatever) upgrade because they are obviously "better" pilots (because they are special hire, Mgt Kid, etc) than every other F/O! Especially if they are only a year or two into this career.
RJ pilots are pilots. Some/many will interview for Majors/Legacy and will be as qualified as other applicants. I would rather hope for the equipment currently flown by regional airlines be flown by the mainline and hire pilots! But this would mean Mgt would have to pay them more! Which is the real reason regional airlines exist. To pay less! Not because RJ pilots are not qualified, but because they can pay them less and whipsaw them. I hope RJ pilots demand and get better pay and work to prevent the wipsaw so it become better for Mgt to move equipment to mainline. Not sure if that is doable, but a nice idea.
#49
AOPA, NO! They promote General Aviation! And they advocate for GA to congress so this country maintains the freedom to fly where and when one wishes.
Please research what AOPA does. DONT ASSUME.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Did you not know the pay scale when you took your job? Its right there on this website in the airline profiles section.
YOU accepted the crappy regional pay viewing it as a stepping stone to something better. If YOU and everyone like YOU refused to work for that pay, the pay would rise.
Supply and demand. Adam Smith knew that in the 18th Century. I guess you were sick that day when they covered it in 7th grade Social Studies.
I take it that means when YOU are the "rich" it will be okay to take it from the "poor" regional F/Os. Yikes! Talk about hypocrisy.
YOU accepted the crappy regional pay viewing it as a stepping stone to something better. If YOU and everyone like YOU refused to work for that pay, the pay would rise.
Supply and demand. Adam Smith knew that in the 18th Century. I guess you were sick that day when they covered it in 7th grade Social Studies.
I take it that means when YOU are the "rich" it will be okay to take it from the "poor" regional F/Os. Yikes! Talk about hypocrisy.
If someone said after decades of working for lower pay, finally getting that CA upgrade in the widebody for 2-3 years at the peak of their "career", that they would not like it, would you believe them? Of course not.
My point was the payscale is flawed from the get go. It should be much more flat.
When I talk to the guys who I fly with, most started at smaller carriers who were merged into bigger ones and ended up at their major that way. Some were military and got hired on without going to a commuter. But none have any idea what it's like nowadays working for outsourced flying. I really can't believe someone would actually blame pilots for taking pretty much the only job (a commuter) that will get them where they want to go (a major). It speaks volumes about your lack of character.
No, it's not the new F/O's fault their pay is so bad. It's the senior guys who negotiate their contract. They always get the lions share of the raises, the vacation, etc. But it's always been like that, of course, even when there wasn't outsourced flying. The difference is it takes 8-10 years to get to the major vs. 2-3 back then. And instead of flying RJ's you were flying Navajos.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post