These CEOs may have a point
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Captain - Retired
Posts: 265
This has been a good thread and I applaud the OP for bringing it up. I don't see any harm in having a discussion. I'm not sure what can be taken away from the thread though. Can the OP or anyone supporting the OP's ideas provide a solution to debate? It's one thing to point out a problem, but an entirely different thing to propose a solution to said problem.
Hiring higher qualified pilots into higher positions including direct entry captains and limiting the number of low time entry level pilots (which would happen anyway as there simply aren't enough to fill all the slots). Making the job more respectable and desirable for those who end up staying while still allowing those who wish to move on the platform to gain experience.
It has been said before that the majors will and do hire first officers directly out of the regionals. There should be no need to have fast upgrades at a regional by low time pilots if there's no intention to make a long term career there.
The increase in pay for the higher experience will be covered by saving on training by not allowing as much transition and upgrade training for those who plan to move on. Savings will also be realized by reducing turnover.
#112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
B
I has occurred to me that there are several main themes among us (airline pilots) that are prevalent.
I has occurred to me that there are several main themes among us (airline pilots) that are prevalent.
- The goal of all airline pilots is to fly left seat and for a reasonable salary and schedule.
- Most, but not all pilots, aspire to the largest possible jet or airline regardless of lifestyle (commuting, etc).
- Some pilots are content at a regional once they have broken the six figure mark and have 15-18 days off per month living at their domicile.
- Pretty much all consider taking a job at a regional as a stepping stone despite that a few end up just staying for duration (previous point).
- Pilots at larger established airlines (as a group) tend to look down at regionals as irrelevant and even pity the pilots despite that they make up about half the pilot workforce these days.
- Those who overwhelmingly support the status quo are at larger established airlines and are protected by seniority while those who would be more willing to accept change are at regionals...(I suspect)
#113
AOPA is a joke. For $45/year you basically are asking to be harassed for more money to fund their C-suite treasury. They also have plenty of issues of their magazine talking about pilot careers and jets.
As for WAI...I thought that organization was there to support women in aviation. It turned its ugly head and is nothing more than a money making machine. Rumor has it thousands of pilots had no choice but to pay $300+ for a recent Orlando "job fair" to talk to major airlines. Yeah...what's WAI's mission statement again?
"Women in Aviation, International is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the encouragement and advancement of women in all aviation career fields and interests."
They can add "...oh, and we also rip off regional airline pilots at the door because we got the bait they want to bite on."
As for WAI...I thought that organization was there to support women in aviation. It turned its ugly head and is nothing more than a money making machine. Rumor has it thousands of pilots had no choice but to pay $300+ for a recent Orlando "job fair" to talk to major airlines. Yeah...what's WAI's mission statement again?
"Women in Aviation, International is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the encouragement and advancement of women in all aviation career fields and interests."
They can add "...oh, and we also rip off regional airline pilots at the door because we got the bait they want to bite on."
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Captain - Retired
Posts: 265
The pay for training thing is related but still a separate issue imo. It still goes on in Europe as well as "pay to fly" programs that are even scarier. The problem is when you have enough entry level pilots with no experience willing to displace more experienced pilots who actually have come to expect to be paid for their time. Airlines are inclined to "reach down" to the bottom of the barrel rather than hire the most qualified applicants...unless they are also willing to start at entry level wages.
Hopefully such practices naturally balance out over time as people don't bother to pursue a career where there is little opportunity for advancement to higher pay. I don't think we are seeing that phenomenon though. I think we are simply seeing that too many airlines are reaching for the bottom of the barrel at the same time and finding there's not much left but the more expensive and more experienced pilots floating near the top....so they cry "pilot shortage" when there are still plenty of (higher qualified) pilots in that barrel.
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
I think we are simply seeing that too many airlines are reaching for the bottom of the barrel at the same time and finding there's not much left but the more expensive and more experienced pilots floating near the top....so they cry "pilot shortage" when there are still plenty of (higher qualified) pilots in that barrel.
9300 hrs, turbine PIC, multiple types, etc).
Wanted to go back but the majors won't touch me without recency (my 25 hrs a yr in a Grumman Cheetah don't count). So I've been making the round of regional interviews with the perceived "bottom of the barrel guys". The last thing I want to do is leave my just under six figure salary for 26K; however, I also don't want to continue my current situation.
So I'm between a rock and a hard place. I run into the same guys at all the regional interviews.
Yes, there's a few with less than stellar credentials. However, there's also a slew of experienced military flyers that took a desk job or were subject to reduced flying over the last year. These guys are in the same boat. I was one of those "qualified ATPs" that said he'd never go back unless the salary came up. Then I came to the conclusion, that's a reality that will never happen. Or maybe it's a game of chicken and I just blinked before the airlines did. I just couldn't wait it out with the time I have left. Anyone that really wants to come back is slowing realizing that and will make the transition as well - as painful as it is.
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,011
I've posted on the other threads so many know my plight but here's a quick recap - been teaching at the big 142 school last couple years but have been employed as a freight, regional, and fractional pilot.
9300 hrs, turbine PIC, multiple types, etc).
Wanted to go back but the majors won't touch me without recency (my 25 hrs a yr in a Grumman Cheetah don't count). So I've been making the round of regional interviews with the perceived "bottom of the barrel guys". The last thing I want to do is leave my just under six figure salary for 26K; however, I also don't want to continue my current situation.
So I'm between a rock and a hard place. I run into the same guys at all the regional interviews.
Yes, there's a few with less than stellar credentials. However, there's also a slew of experienced military flyers that took a desk job or were subject to reduced flying over the last year. These guys are in the same boat. I was one of those "qualified ATPs" that said he'd never go back unless the salary came up. Then I came to the conclusion, that's a reality that will never happen. Or maybe it's a game of chicken and I just blinked before the airlines did. I just couldn't wait it out with the time I have left. Anyone that really wants to come back is slowing realizing that and will make the transition as well - as painful as it is.
9300 hrs, turbine PIC, multiple types, etc).
Wanted to go back but the majors won't touch me without recency (my 25 hrs a yr in a Grumman Cheetah don't count). So I've been making the round of regional interviews with the perceived "bottom of the barrel guys". The last thing I want to do is leave my just under six figure salary for 26K; however, I also don't want to continue my current situation.
So I'm between a rock and a hard place. I run into the same guys at all the regional interviews.
Yes, there's a few with less than stellar credentials. However, there's also a slew of experienced military flyers that took a desk job or were subject to reduced flying over the last year. These guys are in the same boat. I was one of those "qualified ATPs" that said he'd never go back unless the salary came up. Then I came to the conclusion, that's a reality that will never happen. Or maybe it's a game of chicken and I just blinked before the airlines did. I just couldn't wait it out with the time I have left. Anyone that really wants to come back is slowing realizing that and will make the transition as well - as painful as it is.
#118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
I hear what you are saying, but I do wonder what the landscape is going to look like in 6 months. Will the shortage of pilots willing to work for current wages simply mirror the numbers today, or will it be twice as bad forcing something else like bigger sign on bonuses or the reverse- cancelled flights. You've been in the business so at least you know what you are in for.
There's a lot of Camrys in the system right now because of high demand. Higher airfare equals less demand equals less need for pilots. Ugly from a career standpoint but the economics are logical.
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
From a purely economics standpoint what's a way to decrease demand for a good or service? Increase the price. Perhaps a return to the days of $1500 fares from Chicago to DC are in order. As an analogy you can sell 1000 Camrys or 100 Ferraris and make the same amount of money.
There's a lot of Camrys in the system right now because of high demand. Higher airfare equals less demand equals less need for pilots. Ugly from a career standpoint but the economics are logical.
There's a lot of Camrys in the system right now because of high demand. Higher airfare equals less demand equals less need for pilots. Ugly from a career standpoint but the economics are logical.
#120
Consider also the complete lack of walk away power pilots with seniority have when offered a concessionary contract. After you've been with a company for several years you can't move laterally without taking a huge pay cut, hence pilots are willing to deal with all kinds of ridiculousness to protect their job at all costs. It shouldn't be that way.
If a company is not paying/treating you according to the value you bring to an organization one ought to be able to go elsewhere without having to pay dues all over again.
If a company is not paying/treating you according to the value you bring to an organization one ought to be able to go elsewhere without having to pay dues all over again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post