Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Eagle TA independent view. >

Eagle TA independent view.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle TA independent view.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2014, 10:07 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stanherman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Hack pilot
Posts: 216
Default

Take your yes crap and shove it up your a**.

At least I know my no vote cancels your yes vote out.
stanherman is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 10:48 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 96
Default

LMAO @ "independent view"

You have to be kidding.
Freeflyfreak is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 12:41 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
So they are offered the job and can start the first time a class of more than 30 happens.
This is not how our language is written, I'm not seeing how a new agreement at Eagle would circumvent one already in place at PSA.
Ohhh they will!!! Gotta have those new 30 CR9 flying...

Welcome to AA where they will violate the contract. You will grieve it and 10 yrs later you might win.

What if they send interviews and decide not to hire a single PSA guy? You will be stuck at PSA with your pay frozen.
They can't just "not hire a single PSA guy". Our contract isn't for interviews, it's for jobs.

Of course violating the contract is not out of the question but that is true with any contract.

Bzzt's scenario is way more likely to happen than yours.
pagey is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 12:53 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

one half the new hire slots are L-eagle with minimum transfer to aa at 20 a month, but the one half slots no filled by L-eagle pilots is owned by said pilots withheld, this is the 824. after the 824 it is 50% of new hires at 25 a month minimum. most of this is due to arbitration and latter is current cba at L-eagle.

PSA gets preferred interview and management decides which 4 per month can have a job at US airways and you can be withheld for up to 12 months with no retroactive seniority of benefits.

I believe that explains both sides as is current.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 01:05 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cartean's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CRJ
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
one half the new hire slots are L-eagle with minimum transfer to aa at 20 a month, but the one half slots no filled by L-eagle pilots is owned by said pilots withheld, this is the 824. after the 824 it is 50% of new hires at 25 a month minimum. most of this is due to arbitration and latter is current cba at L-eagle.

PSA gets preferred interview and management decides which 4 per month can have a job at US airways and you can be withheld for up to 12 months with no retroactive seniority of benefits.

I believe that explains both sides as is current.
Psa can be held till year end (ie December) not 12 months. Not that it matters that much.
cartean is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 01:20 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

gotcha rolling 12 months per individual
buddies8 is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 01:29 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

gotcha rolling 12 months per individual
No, if you are "hired" in November the latest you can go is December of the current year.
pagey is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 01:59 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
No, if you are "hired" in November the latest you can go is December of the current year.
If our vote passes the interesting situation will be if only 360 are hired at AA in a year. Contractually that would mean all 360 would be from Eagle but they're also required to hire a portion of PSA guys.

Edit: That probably won't matter til the SLI between AA and US which is going to take an incredibly long time. I doubt my scenario will ever come to pass.
Bzzt is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 02:07 PM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
If our vote passes the interesting situation will be if only 360 are hired at AA in a year. Contractually that would mean all 360 would be from Eagle but they're also required to hire a portion of PSA guys.

Edit: That probably won't matter til the SLI between AA and US which is going to take an incredibly long time. I doubt my scenario will ever come to pass.
This was addressed on the conference call today. The first 30 AA hires per month have to be from Eagle and/or 100% up to 360.

That takes precedent over PSA's 4 per month. For PSA's 4 to get class dates AA would need to hire over the above numbers. Otherwise Eagle's flow trumps it.

It was specifically said that Eagle's flow made certain people at PSA "very angry" .
Skyvector is offline  
Old 03-27-2014, 02:09 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector
This was addressed on the conference call today. The first 30 AA hires per month have to be from Eagle and/or 100% up to 360.

That takes precedent over PSA's 4 per month. For PSA's 4 to get class dates AA would need to hire over the above numbers. Otherwise Eagle's flow trumps it.

It was specifically said that Eagle's flow made certain people at PSA "very angry" .
For right now isn't the PSA flow to US Airways? So technically this doesn't matter til the SLI is complete.
Bzzt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bernoulli1129
Flight Schools and Training
28
01-17-2017 03:48 PM
bernoulli1129
Hiring News
2
03-23-2013 11:18 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 02:47 PM
bgmann
Regional
82
07-27-2011 11:54 AM
jared4271987
Flight Schools and Training
10
09-18-2008 08:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices