Eagle TA independent view.
03-26-2014, 06:52 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Holly is biased being that she is also a paid consultant and a former American employee working directly with Bob Crandall. AllisonRR also is a paid management or one our former mec chairman lackey working at tony's union busting consulting firm.
nothing but management supported full court press to scare and force pilots to vote the way management wants the vote to go, because management is not biased, sure.
VOTE NO
nothing but management supported full court press to scare and force pilots to vote the way management wants the vote to go, because management is not biased, sure.
VOTE NO
03-26-2014, 08:35 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 180
This Holly person is the epitome of the self-indulgent and entitled pundit class. I guess having worked close enough to Crandall to smell his farts gave her all the gravitas she'll ever need to tell line pilots what they should do.
For someone whose living isn't dependent on the whims of management, the FAA and the strictures of the RLA she sure knows what's best for Regional Pilots in general and Eagle pilots in the specific case.
It's funny that you can't access her web site unless you pony up about $200 a year to read her wisdom (dreck), but she darn sure doesn't seem to be too interested in seeing salary/financial gains for Regional Pilots. Cognitive dissonance, much Holly? Holly wanna get paid...
For someone whose living isn't dependent on the whims of management, the FAA and the strictures of the RLA she sure knows what's best for Regional Pilots in general and Eagle pilots in the specific case.
It's funny that you can't access her web site unless you pony up about $200 a year to read her wisdom (dreck), but she darn sure doesn't seem to be too interested in seeing salary/financial gains for Regional Pilots. Cognitive dissonance, much Holly? Holly wanna get paid...
03-26-2014, 09:59 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,420
Waste of time. It'll pass. FOs will vote yes for movement (ooh shiny jet). Senior Captains will push it through because they don't want their cheese moved.
Guys on RSV have been here around 3 years. They know our management and lived thru BK.
The Yes vote is more from the senior and jr captains. One want to retire, the other one don't want to lose their seat.
03-26-2014, 10:17 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: ERJ, CA
Posts: 718
03-26-2014, 11:03 AM
#20
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 49
Holly is biased being that she is also a paid consultant and a former American employee working directly with Bob Crandall. AllisonRR also is a paid management or one our former mec chairman lackey working at tony's union busting consulting firm.
nothing but management supported full court press to scare and force pilots to vote the way management wants the vote to go, because management is not biased, sure.
VOTE NO
nothing but management supported full court press to scare and force pilots to vote the way management wants the vote to go, because management is not biased, sure.
VOTE NO
No I'm not management or have any desire to be I like to fly and this is why I bother to post. I don't believe the NO is the smart choice.
For the record that article is biased and I only posted it because it looks very similar to what we get from Dallas and New York LEC's.
I have always said that the TA has risks and rewards and it is only my opinion that the risks do not outweigh the rewards.
I respect the pilots that vote on principle. And I would like the same respect as I don't share their opinions.
VOTE SMART
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bernoulli1129
Flight Schools and Training
28
01-17-2017 03:48 PM
